Skip to main content

Acceldata Releases AI Observability

Acceldata announced AI Observability, a solution that brings observability for LLM and agentic AI applications to Acceldata’s xLake Data & AI Platform.

Acceldata governs and traces AI across a hybrid estate, on-premises and across clouds, without first requiring the data to be consolidated in one place. That reach does two things at once. It makes agents safe to put into production, and it lets enterprises build agents against data they could never centralize.

AI Observability traces every prompt, model call, tool invocation and retrieval step, continuously evaluating outputs to ensure they are correct, reliable and aligned with user intent. This adds to the data quality, lineage and pipeline monitoring the platform already provides.

AI Observability gives teams one view spanning data health and AI behavior, wherever the data lives, rather than a separate tool for each layer. While tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard, governing them wherever the data lives is not.

“The top blocker to enterprise AI is fear of ungoverned agents and data. Acceldata removes it with the introduction of AI Observability to the xLake Data & AI Platform,” said Rohit Choudhary, Acceldata founder and CEO. “Now you can govern and trace AI wherever your data lives, on-premises or across clouds, which lets you build agents against data you could never centralize. Governance becomes the reason you can do more with your data, not less.”

Acceldata’s approach to AI Observability:

First, Acceldata governs and traces an agent wherever the data lives, across a hybrid estate of on-premises and cloud, so organizations can trust the agents they run and build new agents with confidence.

“Tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard; what matters is what a failure connects to,” said Ashwin Rajeeva, Acceldata co-founder and CTO. “We connect it to data quality, pipeline health, lineage, and compute across a hybrid estate, on-premises and cloud, on the platform teams already run for data observability.”

Second, an agent failure and the data behind it sit in one console. On the same platform that monitors data quality, lineage and pipelines, a team can follow a failing trace back to the data product or pipeline that produced it, instead of stopping at the model or the application layer. Existing solutions for observing agents each stop at a different boundary: the application and infrastructure layer, the cloud data warehouse or the model. Unlike tools anchored to a single cloud warehouse or the application layer, Acceldata reaches across the hybrid estate that spans public cloud and on-premises.

Acceldata's AI Observability brings the agent-behavior view to a platform already built on data observability and runtime governance.

The solution helps address issues customers face, including hallucinations, debugging without visibility, data quality issues, inflated token costs and other problems.

AI Observability includes several additional features that help mitigate the governance issues plaguing organizations, including:

  • Full execution tracing. Every conversation resolves into a thread, trace and span structure across prompts, model calls, tool calls, retrieval and agent steps, so teams can debug a single run step by step.
  • Traceback to the data source. AI Observability shares one console with the platform's data quality, lineage and pipeline views, so a failure seen in a trace can be followed to the data product or pipeline that produced it.
  • Continuous evaluation. Online evaluation scores production traffic, and offline evaluation runs regression and model comparison on curated datasets, using LLM-as-judge, heuristic and custom metrics such as hallucination, answer relevance and context precision. It alerts IT when quality, latency, cost or reliability crosses a threshold.
  • Feedback and dataset flywheel. With datasets treated as first-class objects, teams annotate traces with human feedback and promote production traces, including failures, into evaluation sets.
  • Cost and performance visibility. Token usage, cost, latency and error trends by project, model and application version.
  • Governance and runtime safety. Sensitive data and PII detection, configurable data masking, policy checks captured in the trace, audit of AI usage and multi-tenant isolation.
  • Broad framework coverage. Integrations across LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, AutoGen, ADK, OpenAI and Anthropic, plus SDK instrumentation for custom applications.

Acceldata AI Observability software is delivered as a native capability of the Acceldata platform rather than a standalone point product. Teams instrument applications through the SDK and framework integrations.

The Latest

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Acceldata Releases AI Observability

Acceldata announced AI Observability, a solution that brings observability for LLM and agentic AI applications to Acceldata’s xLake Data & AI Platform.

Acceldata governs and traces AI across a hybrid estate, on-premises and across clouds, without first requiring the data to be consolidated in one place. That reach does two things at once. It makes agents safe to put into production, and it lets enterprises build agents against data they could never centralize.

AI Observability traces every prompt, model call, tool invocation and retrieval step, continuously evaluating outputs to ensure they are correct, reliable and aligned with user intent. This adds to the data quality, lineage and pipeline monitoring the platform already provides.

AI Observability gives teams one view spanning data health and AI behavior, wherever the data lives, rather than a separate tool for each layer. While tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard, governing them wherever the data lives is not.

“The top blocker to enterprise AI is fear of ungoverned agents and data. Acceldata removes it with the introduction of AI Observability to the xLake Data & AI Platform,” said Rohit Choudhary, Acceldata founder and CEO. “Now you can govern and trace AI wherever your data lives, on-premises or across clouds, which lets you build agents against data you could never centralize. Governance becomes the reason you can do more with your data, not less.”

Acceldata’s approach to AI Observability:

First, Acceldata governs and traces an agent wherever the data lives, across a hybrid estate of on-premises and cloud, so organizations can trust the agents they run and build new agents with confidence.

“Tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard; what matters is what a failure connects to,” said Ashwin Rajeeva, Acceldata co-founder and CTO. “We connect it to data quality, pipeline health, lineage, and compute across a hybrid estate, on-premises and cloud, on the platform teams already run for data observability.”

Second, an agent failure and the data behind it sit in one console. On the same platform that monitors data quality, lineage and pipelines, a team can follow a failing trace back to the data product or pipeline that produced it, instead of stopping at the model or the application layer. Existing solutions for observing agents each stop at a different boundary: the application and infrastructure layer, the cloud data warehouse or the model. Unlike tools anchored to a single cloud warehouse or the application layer, Acceldata reaches across the hybrid estate that spans public cloud and on-premises.

Acceldata's AI Observability brings the agent-behavior view to a platform already built on data observability and runtime governance.

The solution helps address issues customers face, including hallucinations, debugging without visibility, data quality issues, inflated token costs and other problems.

AI Observability includes several additional features that help mitigate the governance issues plaguing organizations, including:

  • Full execution tracing. Every conversation resolves into a thread, trace and span structure across prompts, model calls, tool calls, retrieval and agent steps, so teams can debug a single run step by step.
  • Traceback to the data source. AI Observability shares one console with the platform's data quality, lineage and pipeline views, so a failure seen in a trace can be followed to the data product or pipeline that produced it.
  • Continuous evaluation. Online evaluation scores production traffic, and offline evaluation runs regression and model comparison on curated datasets, using LLM-as-judge, heuristic and custom metrics such as hallucination, answer relevance and context precision. It alerts IT when quality, latency, cost or reliability crosses a threshold.
  • Feedback and dataset flywheel. With datasets treated as first-class objects, teams annotate traces with human feedback and promote production traces, including failures, into evaluation sets.
  • Cost and performance visibility. Token usage, cost, latency and error trends by project, model and application version.
  • Governance and runtime safety. Sensitive data and PII detection, configurable data masking, policy checks captured in the trace, audit of AI usage and multi-tenant isolation.
  • Broad framework coverage. Integrations across LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, AutoGen, ADK, OpenAI and Anthropic, plus SDK instrumentation for custom applications.

Acceldata AI Observability software is delivered as a native capability of the Acceldata platform rather than a standalone point product. Teams instrument applications through the SDK and framework integrations.

The Latest

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...