EMA published the AIA buyer's guide — directed at helping IT invest in Advanced IT Analytics(AIA), what the industry more commonly calls "Operational Analytics." We created what we called "Shopping Cart Criteria" based on our prior research on AIA adoptions over the past three years. We divided the sixteen shopping cart criteria into three parts: Cost advantage, Environments and Scenarios.
Start with Part 1: Cost Advantage
In this blog, I will address environments. Environments, as indicated by the list below, indicate "where" the AIA solutions we investigated can be applied. All 13 solutions supported cloud for performance, core infrastructure, and application performance and availability. Mainframe had the support of six of our respondents, and IoT and cloud for change and capacity were not yet prime areas of focus for most of the vendors in our guide.
■ Cloud for Performance Management
■ Cloud for Change/Capacity/Cost Optimization
■ Core Infrastructure (Network/Data Center)
■ Application Performance and Availability Management
■ Internet of Things (IoT)
Cloud for Performance Management
Here we addressed cloud in all its forms, including public cloud, virtualization, microservices and containers, and hybrid cloud environments — with a focus on performance management of IT services and their associated infrastructure. We saw fairly pervasive support for AWS, Azure, Docker and containers, and microservices. Present but less prevalent was support for Google Cloud, IBM Bluemix, Rackspace and Fujitsu Cloud. We also saw integrations with Pivotal Cloud Foundry in support of DevOps initiatives.
Cloud for Change/Capacity/Cost Optimization
Capacity and cost decisions are often joined at the hip in dealing with planning deployment choices across public and private cloud. These decisions can also significantly impact performance. And in fact, in last year's AIA research, optimizing cloud resources generally ranked higher than pure-play performance management in AIA requirements. This unique but critical area was addressed proactively by several of the vendors in this report, especially those with integrations for capacity analytics, and in two cases even cloud-related pricing models.
Core Infrastructure (Network/Data Center)
All of the solutions represented in this report were directed to some degree at cross-domain operational needs. But the approach they took varied dramatically. In evaluating ratings associated with this criterion, we looked for breadth of coverage, relevant stakeholder support, and breadth of capabilities for assessing issues with infrastructure performance both in itself, and in the context of service delivery.
Mainframes in various form factors have hardly disappeared, and many of the world's most critical IT business services are still dependent on mainframe availability and performance. In evaluating this criterion, we looked at the established architectural support for mainframes, as well as the history of the vendor in mainframe support, and its currency in keeping up with new mainframe design and features.
Application Performance and Availability Management
If IT is a business, then theoretically it has "products." And unquestionably the single most prominent products of IT are its application business services. In evaluating this criterion, we looked at breadth and depth of support for a wide range of application types, insight into application-to-application and application-to-infrastructure interdependencies, advanced levels of transaction awareness, and handshakes to support DevOps and business impact.
Internet of Things (IoT)
IoT is an emerging area, and one that many solutions in this report are architecturally designed to support — even if, in most cases, IoT has not yet been a priority in deployments. In evaluating this criterion, we looked at three things: architectural feasibility to support IoT data inputs, proof points of IoT use cases from actual deployments, and proactive support for IoT with unique out-of-the box functionality.
In my next blog I address our seven "scenarios" ranging from DevOps and SecOps to business impact and business alignment.
Read Part 3: Scenarios
Gartner highlighted the top strategic technology trends that will impact most organizations in 2018. The next trends focus on blending the digital and physical worlds to create an immersive, digitally enhanced environment. The last three refer to exploiting connections between an expanding set of people and businesses, as well as devices, content and services to deliver digital business outcomes ...
Gartner highlighted the top strategic technology trends that will impact most organizations in 2018. The first three strategic technology trends explore how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are seeping into virtually everything and represent a major battleground for technology providers over the next five years ...
In the Riverbed Future of Networking Global Survey, more than half of the respondents acknowledged that achieving operational agility is critical to the success of a modern enterprise, and next-generation networks as well as the technology to support them are key to reaching this goal ...
Legacy infrastructures are holding back their cloud and digital strategies, according to the Riverbed Future of Networking Global Survey 2017. Nearly all survey respondents agree that legacy network infrastructure will have difficulty keeping pace with the changing demands of the cloud and hybrid networks ...
Digital disruptors are emerging in all industries, and the need for CIOs to embrace digital transformation is urgent, according to Gartner ...
Environments indicate "where" the AIA solutions we investigated can be applied. All 13 of the solutions we investigated support cloud for performance, core infrastructure, and application performance and availability. Mainframe had the support of six of our respondents, and IoT and cloud for change and capacity were not yet prime areas of focus for most of the vendors in our AIA buyer's guide ...
Cost, overhead, and time to value are often key challenges in adopting AIA solutions. In the past, these factors have often been especially onerous. But we saw strong levels of improvement among many vendors, and surprising areas of innovation among others ...