APM Predictions 2016: Choosing an APM for Maximum Advantage
December 28, 2015

Larry Haig
Intechnica

Share this

As foreseen in previous years, the Application Performance Management (APM) market continues to develop, both in terms of numbers of providers and inherent functionality, particularly with regard to end user visibility. However, a lack of fundamental differentiation between many of the providers means that consolidation is to be expected, either due to the collapse of (over geared) Vendors, or via acquisition.

New adopters of APM would be well advised to consider whether their favored vendor is likely to be a purchaser (and therefore provide continuity), or a purchase (and run the risk of absorption into a larger system, or disappearance). This advice would tend to favor the larger / more established Vendors. Partly, however, this will depend on the investment and time horizons for the chosen product. "An APM is for life, not just for Christmas" does not necessarily have to be a given, particularly for smaller companies with straightforward delivery infrastructure and little legacy baggage.

It is increasingly necessary to trade off the ongoing, expensive, skills requirements necessary to gain the most from some APMs versus the immediate (but perhaps ultimately more limited) value of competing products.

Such decisions are largely dependent upon the inherent complexity of a delivery infrastructure. Dimensions include:

■ Number and type of underlying technology (legacy to bleeding edge)

■ Inherent application complexity

■ Extensibility – physical or virtual

■ 3rd party inclusions (client side affiliates to server-side web services links)

■ Nature and distribution of end usage – devices, native applications, geography, etc.

It is worth considering the overall benefits of (for example) gaining say 75% of the theoretical maximal visibility and value from an easily configurable and accessible "light touch" APM; against driving for maximum value and precision. The latter approach necessarily requires higher overheads in a range of areas, from more intricate definition of output dashboards/reports to greater ongoing management and interpretative skills. Whatever the salesman says, none of the higher end APM tools are truly "plug and play" – all require tuning, both to provide good understanding and to minimize performance overhead.

As always, the ability of your chosen APM to work with your current (and anticipated) technology stack – application framework, legacy components (mainframe, VAX?), modern extensions (microservices containers), in addition to the ability to cope with your anticipated throughput volumes and demand patterns) are primary requirements.

Larry Haig is Senior Consultant at Intechnica.

Share this

The Latest

April 24, 2024

Over the last 20 years Digital Employee Experience has become a necessity for companies committed to digital transformation and improving IT experiences. In fact, by 2025, more than 50% of IT organizations will use digital employee experience to prioritize and measure digital initiative success ...

April 23, 2024

While most companies are now deploying cloud-based technologies, the 2024 Secure Cloud Networking Field Report from Aviatrix found that there is a silent struggle to maximize value from those investments. Many of the challenges organizations have faced over the past several years have evolved, but continue today ...

April 22, 2024

In our latest research, Cisco's The App Attention Index 2023: Beware the Application Generation, 62% of consumers report their expectations for digital experiences are far higher than they were two years ago, and 64% state they are less forgiving of poor digital services than they were just 12 months ago ...

April 19, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 5, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the network source of truth ...

April 18, 2024

A vast majority (89%) of organizations have rapidly expanded their technology in the past few years and three quarters (76%) say it's brought with it increased "chaos" that they have to manage, according to Situation Report 2024: Managing Technology Chaos from Software AG ...

April 17, 2024

In 2024 the number one challenge facing IT teams is a lack of skilled workers, and many are turning to automation as an answer, according to IT Trends: 2024 Industry Report ...

April 16, 2024

Organizations are continuing to embrace multicloud environments and cloud-native architectures to enable rapid transformation and deliver secure innovation. However, despite the speed, scale, and agility enabled by these modern cloud ecosystems, organizations are struggling to manage the explosion of data they create, according to The state of observability 2024: Overcoming complexity through AI-driven analytics and automation strategies, a report from Dynatrace ...

April 15, 2024

Organizations recognize the value of observability, but only 10% of them are actually practicing full observability of their applications and infrastructure. This is among the key findings from the recently completed Logz.io 2024 Observability Pulse Survey and Report ...

April 11, 2024

Businesses must adopt a comprehensive Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) strategy, says Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), a leading IT analyst research firm. This strategy is crucial to bridge the significant observability gap within today's complex IT infrastructures. The recommendation is particularly timely, given that 99% of enterprises are expanding their use of the Internet as a primary connectivity conduit while facing challenges due to the inefficiency of multiple, disjointed monitoring tools, according to Modern Enterprises Must Boost Observability with Internet Performance Monitoring, a new report from EMA and Catchpoint ...

April 10, 2024

Choosing the right approach is critical with cloud monitoring in hybrid environments. Otherwise, you may drive up costs with features you don’t need and risk diminishing the visibility of your on-premises IT ...