Skip to main content

Backend to the Future: How AIOps Is Transforming Application Monitoring

Antonio Piraino

The modern enterprise's IT ecosystem is highly complex and ephemeral. When IT performance lags, and when incidents arrive, IT operations teams need complete visibility across their system infrastructure to address issues properly and efficiently.

Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience.

How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps.

Discovery: Separating the Good Data from the Bad

The foundation of effective application monitoring and management is quality data. But to identify "good data," it helps to have a good idea of what constitutes its opposite. "Bad data" is either inaccurate, incomplete, irrelevant, or inconsistent. What every enterprise needs for effective application monitoring is, above all, quality data that can yield actionable insights.

But what kind of data is most essential? Enterprises should approach monitoring with an eye towards both breadth and depth. That means first gathering data across the enterprise's network and infrastructure to take stock of its potential impact on applications, and then taking a "top-down" approach to gain insight into individual applications, their operational environments, and their business functions.

Context: So What Does It All Mean?

Once you have good operational training data — accurate, complete, relevant, and consistent data — it must be contextualized to deliver insights that drive recommendations and automated actions. An unclean "data swamp" that is full of unstructured garbage is of little help to an IT team that must expend significant resources in order to convert it into a "data lake," filled with clean, usable data. No matter how much analytics get thrown at a data swamp — poorly defined data will inevitably yield flawed results, liable to negatively impact the enterprise's bottom line.

The incredible amount of data produced by applications is both a blessing and a curse for the modern enterprise. A blessing, because the more available data there is, the more insight-fueled operational capabilities an enterprise has to work with; a curse, because data must be properly contextualized to be useful. In other words, IT teams don't just need the bare-bones information that data provides, they need metadata to illustrate the relationships among disparate data points to understand the impact of the underlying phenomena and pinpoint the root causes of those phenomena. The AIOps-driven process of applying "context to chaos" is central to providing an all-encompassing view of an application's health.

Transformation: Acting on Data-Driven Insights

Application monitoring solutions that reside in the operating system and provide code-level performance, tracing, application topology mapping, and tracking can provide both incident automation and data-driven recommendations that enable IT teams to prevent issues and preempt the occurrence of potential backend outages. Furthermore, by helping IT teams differentiate between normal occurrences and those that require attention and remediation according to degree of priority, AIOps gives IT teams the insight they need to act, rapidly and efficiently. This "noise reduction" functionality also routes alerts to appropriate teams, reducing inefficiencies and streamlining workflows.

Who Can Benefit?

Which enterprises most stand to gain from application monitoring? While workloads are gaining in complexity and ephemerality across the board, application monitoring is meant for enterprises that most require code-level visibility — those that have either developed many custom applications and/or those that prioritize understanding code function and its impact on applications central to the business' bottom line.

AIOps is facilitating a new era in application monitoring by giving IT teams the tools they need to gain visibility across the breadth and depth of their application stacks. As enterprise workflows become ever more complex and ephemeral, the costs of not adopting AI for operations will become ever more apparent as the benefits of AIOps continue to be felt — from the application end-user to the enterprise's bottom line.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Performance bottlenecks aren't uncommon when it comes to rolling out new technology, regardless of how capable or game-changing that technology might be. Every generation of new tech has encountered roadblocks that had to be overcome before it was truly able to shine. Virtualization forced organizations to rethink resource allocation, cloud transformation had us shift our focus toward scalability and elasticity, and microservices introduced entirely new challenges around observability and distributed systems. There's something different about AI, however ...

Consider a single order represented across order-management, execution, and settlement systems. Each database, message broker, and application may be online and processing its own records correctly. Yet the workflow has failed if related events arrive on different clocks, rely on inconsistent state, or cannot be reconciled before an operational decision must be made ...

AI now exists in almost every IT workflow. In a recent survey of more than 800 IT service professionals, all respondents indicated the use of AI in some form within their organization. But there's a growing paradox: if dashboards are clearing faster and alerts are resolved at unprecedented speed, why aren't IT service desks reporting lighter workloads? The research found that 71% of IT teams said their actual workload has remained flat or increased since adopting AI. This reality appears to contradict what we’ve been told about AI ...

Two years ago, almost every customer conversation about AI started with the same questions: Which model should we use? What can it do? Is it ready for the enterprise? Today, those discussions have moved on. CIOs are far more interested in how to govern AI, integrate it with existing systems, prepare their workforce and make it part of everyday operations. The challenge is no longer to prove that AI can deliver value. It's instead about how to embed AI into the business in a way that's secure, scalable and delivers measurable outcomes ...

Two things happened to production incidents between 2023 and now, and they did not happen at the same speed. The first is that a class of dependency that barely existed three years ago now accounts for one incident in ten. Incidents disclosed by AI model and AI application providers rose from 1.7% of all disclosed unplanned incidents in 2023 to 10.7% in 2026 year to date, roughly a sixfold rise; that counts only incidents at AI companies themselves, so the true share is higher. The second is that the time to close an incident has not come down ...

Backend to the Future: How AIOps Is Transforming Application Monitoring

Antonio Piraino

The modern enterprise's IT ecosystem is highly complex and ephemeral. When IT performance lags, and when incidents arrive, IT operations teams need complete visibility across their system infrastructure to address issues properly and efficiently.

Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience.

How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps.

Discovery: Separating the Good Data from the Bad

The foundation of effective application monitoring and management is quality data. But to identify "good data," it helps to have a good idea of what constitutes its opposite. "Bad data" is either inaccurate, incomplete, irrelevant, or inconsistent. What every enterprise needs for effective application monitoring is, above all, quality data that can yield actionable insights.

But what kind of data is most essential? Enterprises should approach monitoring with an eye towards both breadth and depth. That means first gathering data across the enterprise's network and infrastructure to take stock of its potential impact on applications, and then taking a "top-down" approach to gain insight into individual applications, their operational environments, and their business functions.

Context: So What Does It All Mean?

Once you have good operational training data — accurate, complete, relevant, and consistent data — it must be contextualized to deliver insights that drive recommendations and automated actions. An unclean "data swamp" that is full of unstructured garbage is of little help to an IT team that must expend significant resources in order to convert it into a "data lake," filled with clean, usable data. No matter how much analytics get thrown at a data swamp — poorly defined data will inevitably yield flawed results, liable to negatively impact the enterprise's bottom line.

The incredible amount of data produced by applications is both a blessing and a curse for the modern enterprise. A blessing, because the more available data there is, the more insight-fueled operational capabilities an enterprise has to work with; a curse, because data must be properly contextualized to be useful. In other words, IT teams don't just need the bare-bones information that data provides, they need metadata to illustrate the relationships among disparate data points to understand the impact of the underlying phenomena and pinpoint the root causes of those phenomena. The AIOps-driven process of applying "context to chaos" is central to providing an all-encompassing view of an application's health.

Transformation: Acting on Data-Driven Insights

Application monitoring solutions that reside in the operating system and provide code-level performance, tracing, application topology mapping, and tracking can provide both incident automation and data-driven recommendations that enable IT teams to prevent issues and preempt the occurrence of potential backend outages. Furthermore, by helping IT teams differentiate between normal occurrences and those that require attention and remediation according to degree of priority, AIOps gives IT teams the insight they need to act, rapidly and efficiently. This "noise reduction" functionality also routes alerts to appropriate teams, reducing inefficiencies and streamlining workflows.

Who Can Benefit?

Which enterprises most stand to gain from application monitoring? While workloads are gaining in complexity and ephemerality across the board, application monitoring is meant for enterprises that most require code-level visibility — those that have either developed many custom applications and/or those that prioritize understanding code function and its impact on applications central to the business' bottom line.

AIOps is facilitating a new era in application monitoring by giving IT teams the tools they need to gain visibility across the breadth and depth of their application stacks. As enterprise workflows become ever more complex and ephemeral, the costs of not adopting AI for operations will become ever more apparent as the benefits of AIOps continue to be felt — from the application end-user to the enterprise's bottom line.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Performance bottlenecks aren't uncommon when it comes to rolling out new technology, regardless of how capable or game-changing that technology might be. Every generation of new tech has encountered roadblocks that had to be overcome before it was truly able to shine. Virtualization forced organizations to rethink resource allocation, cloud transformation had us shift our focus toward scalability and elasticity, and microservices introduced entirely new challenges around observability and distributed systems. There's something different about AI, however ...

Consider a single order represented across order-management, execution, and settlement systems. Each database, message broker, and application may be online and processing its own records correctly. Yet the workflow has failed if related events arrive on different clocks, rely on inconsistent state, or cannot be reconciled before an operational decision must be made ...

AI now exists in almost every IT workflow. In a recent survey of more than 800 IT service professionals, all respondents indicated the use of AI in some form within their organization. But there's a growing paradox: if dashboards are clearing faster and alerts are resolved at unprecedented speed, why aren't IT service desks reporting lighter workloads? The research found that 71% of IT teams said their actual workload has remained flat or increased since adopting AI. This reality appears to contradict what we’ve been told about AI ...

Two years ago, almost every customer conversation about AI started with the same questions: Which model should we use? What can it do? Is it ready for the enterprise? Today, those discussions have moved on. CIOs are far more interested in how to govern AI, integrate it with existing systems, prepare their workforce and make it part of everyday operations. The challenge is no longer to prove that AI can deliver value. It's instead about how to embed AI into the business in a way that's secure, scalable and delivers measurable outcomes ...

Two things happened to production incidents between 2023 and now, and they did not happen at the same speed. The first is that a class of dependency that barely existed three years ago now accounts for one incident in ten. Incidents disclosed by AI model and AI application providers rose from 1.7% of all disclosed unplanned incidents in 2023 to 10.7% in 2026 year to date, roughly a sixfold rise; that counts only incidents at AI companies themselves, so the true share is higher. The second is that the time to close an incident has not come down ...