Skip to main content

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

Krishna Sai
SolarWinds

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation.

However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving. Roughly 80% of IT pros now identify less as operators focused on discrete tasks and more as orchestrators managing the sophisticated AI systems that power the business. For organizations to thrive in this new reality, leadership must foster a culture that doesn't just deploy AI, but actively empowers the human experts governing it.

From Operator to Orchestrator

The transition from operator to orchestrator requires a fundamental realignment between technical teams and the C-suite. It is critical for executives to recognize that AI isn't just doing the work; it is reshaping the work. IT professionals now report that their roles are increasingly strategic, cross-functional, and — crucially — more complex.

The data shows a clear shift in daily priorities. Teams are spending significantly less time on reactive incident response and more on proactive issue prevention. This isn't a reduction in workload; it's a redirection. Today's IT pros are focused on high-value initiatives: interpreting AI-driven insights (59%), architecting intelligent workflows (56%), and validating AI outputs (47%) to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Bridging the Preparedness Gap

Despite this evolution, a significant disconnect exists between executive perception and the reality on the ground. While nearly half (47%) of C-suite leaders believe their teams are extremely prepared for these new requirements, only 13% of technical staff share that confidence.

This gap often manifests as a lack of trust. While a human-in-the-loop approach is a cornerstone of responsible AI, excessive skepticism can stall progress. Our research found that 71% of pros feel the need to double-check every AI output, and 62% struggle to trust AI-generated recommendations. Addressing these anxieties around data privacy and security is paramount to making AI an effective force multiplier.

Creating a Human-Centric AI Culture

To successfully orchestrate an autonomous enterprise, organizations must prioritize the human element. We can simplify this transition through three strategic pillars:

1. Non-Negotiable Training: While frontline managers see the value in formal AI upskilling, only 40% of the broader workforce feels they have the necessary resources. As AI agents gain more autonomy over mission-critical workflows, specialized training is the only way to maximize value and mitigate the cost of errors.

2. Governance by Design: Security and governance cannot be an afterthought. By adopting an AI by Design framework, organizations can establish clear guardrails for where and how AI operates, ensuring human oversight is baked into the process from day one.

3. Consolidation Before Automation: Complexity is the enemy of resilience. Most IT pros are already managing fragmented environments across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures. Before layering on AI, organizations should unify their observability and data management. Consolidating the infrastructure makes the orchestration of AI agents far more manageable.

Humans Are the Backbone of Automated Operational Resilience

The ultimate goal in this era of unpredictability is Automated Operational Resilience — the ability for a system to automatically anticipate and adapt to disruptions. While AI provides the engine for this resilience, human IT teams remain the backbone. To scale AI adoption effectively, we must provide our orchestrators with the training, governance frameworks, and trusted tools they need to eliminate complexity and lead with confidence.

Krishna Sai is CTO of SolarWinds

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

Krishna Sai
SolarWinds

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation.

However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving. Roughly 80% of IT pros now identify less as operators focused on discrete tasks and more as orchestrators managing the sophisticated AI systems that power the business. For organizations to thrive in this new reality, leadership must foster a culture that doesn't just deploy AI, but actively empowers the human experts governing it.

From Operator to Orchestrator

The transition from operator to orchestrator requires a fundamental realignment between technical teams and the C-suite. It is critical for executives to recognize that AI isn't just doing the work; it is reshaping the work. IT professionals now report that their roles are increasingly strategic, cross-functional, and — crucially — more complex.

The data shows a clear shift in daily priorities. Teams are spending significantly less time on reactive incident response and more on proactive issue prevention. This isn't a reduction in workload; it's a redirection. Today's IT pros are focused on high-value initiatives: interpreting AI-driven insights (59%), architecting intelligent workflows (56%), and validating AI outputs (47%) to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Bridging the Preparedness Gap

Despite this evolution, a significant disconnect exists between executive perception and the reality on the ground. While nearly half (47%) of C-suite leaders believe their teams are extremely prepared for these new requirements, only 13% of technical staff share that confidence.

This gap often manifests as a lack of trust. While a human-in-the-loop approach is a cornerstone of responsible AI, excessive skepticism can stall progress. Our research found that 71% of pros feel the need to double-check every AI output, and 62% struggle to trust AI-generated recommendations. Addressing these anxieties around data privacy and security is paramount to making AI an effective force multiplier.

Creating a Human-Centric AI Culture

To successfully orchestrate an autonomous enterprise, organizations must prioritize the human element. We can simplify this transition through three strategic pillars:

1. Non-Negotiable Training: While frontline managers see the value in formal AI upskilling, only 40% of the broader workforce feels they have the necessary resources. As AI agents gain more autonomy over mission-critical workflows, specialized training is the only way to maximize value and mitigate the cost of errors.

2. Governance by Design: Security and governance cannot be an afterthought. By adopting an AI by Design framework, organizations can establish clear guardrails for where and how AI operates, ensuring human oversight is baked into the process from day one.

3. Consolidation Before Automation: Complexity is the enemy of resilience. Most IT pros are already managing fragmented environments across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures. Before layering on AI, organizations should unify their observability and data management. Consolidating the infrastructure makes the orchestration of AI agents far more manageable.

Humans Are the Backbone of Automated Operational Resilience

The ultimate goal in this era of unpredictability is Automated Operational Resilience — the ability for a system to automatically anticipate and adapt to disruptions. While AI provides the engine for this resilience, human IT teams remain the backbone. To scale AI adoption effectively, we must provide our orchestrators with the training, governance frameworks, and trusted tools they need to eliminate complexity and lead with confidence.

Krishna Sai is CTO of SolarWinds

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...