In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Doug Roberts, Director of Enterprise Products at Fluke Networks, discusses Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM) and its relation to — and difference from — Application Performance Management (APM) and traditional Network Performance Management (NPM).
APM: What is AANPM? How is it different from traditional NPM?
DR: Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM) is an approach to monitoring, troubleshooting and analyzing both networks and application systems. Whereas traditional Network Performance Management (NPM) focuses on monitoring the health of devices, AANPM takes a more holistic view to address the complex issues facing business application systems today.
There is a real need for management platforms to broaden their visibility to include both network and application analytics. Data must be correlated to enable network engineers to quickly locate problems, regardless of their source — network or server, wired or wireless, physical or virtual, local or remote, real-time or back-in-time, client or cloud.
APM: Are AANPM and Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics (NPMD) referring to the same tool?
DR: While different analyst firms use different terms, they all essentially boil down to the same thing. The traditional NPM approach of monitoring the health of a network endpoint and its traffic/utilization is no longer enough. When you see ANPM, AANPM or NPMD they are all referring to the same technological leap forward: network monitoring tools that understand the applications being delivered on the network and the quality of that delivery.
APM: Explain the difference between APM and AANPM.
DR: While both APM and AANPM seek to answer the question of why performance is slow, they are typically targeted at different users.
An application owner or DevOps team needs deep visibility into where performance bottlenecks are occurring within an application, perhaps even down to the module or line of code. This is typically accomplished by instrumenting the application server with an agent to monitor application behavior. These APM tools may have some understanding of the network, but not where or why there is a network problem. The agent-based nature of these approaches often limits what applications can be monitored by an APM solution (such as Java, .Net, Ruby, PHP etc.).
On the other hand, network teams want to quickly identify whether a performance problem is actually due to either a network, server or application slowdown since they’re typically burdened with proving the network isn’t the cause. When a network issue does occur, they need to quickly identify where the problem is located and what’s contributing to it. Using AANPM tools, they can quickly see where the issue is located within the network, what the user is doing and what’s causing that network performance slowdown. This provides a complete picture of the application, the network and the actual end-user experience.
APM: Is AANPM designed to augment or replace APM?
DR: It’s a little bit of both. APM and AANPM are typically used by different IT functions to monitor different things, which means they can live side by side in the same environment, monitoring performance from different perspectives. Since APM requires agents, it is typically limited to supporting specific platforms like Java, .NET, Ruby, PHP, etc. But what about the rest of the applications in the IT environment? Because AANPM solutions inspect data as it traverses the wire, they can offer broader application performance monitoring without being tied to the specific platform on which the application is running.
Given that AANPM can provide both broad and deep visibility into application transactions, many customers find they have enough visibility into applications and networks by leveraging AANPM’s ability to identify poorly performing application behavior and transactions across the network.
Many vendors, including Fluke Networks, offer integration between APM and AANPM. While both technologies will typically monitor the same critical applications, the workflows will typically branch early to cover the distinct use cases of an APM user versus a network-focused user.
The Latest
Organizations are continuing to embrace multicloud environments and cloud-native architectures to enable rapid transformation and deliver secure innovation. However, despite the speed, scale, and agility enabled by these modern cloud ecosystems, organizations are struggling to manage the explosion of data they create, according to The state of observability 2024: Overcoming complexity through AI-driven analytics and automation strategies, a report from Dynatrace ...
Organizations recognize the value of observability, but only 10% of them are actually practicing full observability of their applications and infrastructure. This is among the key findings from the recently completed Logz.io 2024 Observability Pulse Survey and Report ...
Businesses must adopt a comprehensive Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) strategy, says Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), a leading IT analyst research firm. This strategy is crucial to bridge the significant observability gap within today's complex IT infrastructures. The recommendation is particularly timely, given that 99% of enterprises are expanding their use of the Internet as a primary connectivity conduit while facing challenges due to the inefficiency of multiple, disjointed monitoring tools, according to Modern Enterprises Must Boost Observability with Internet Performance Monitoring, a new report from EMA and Catchpoint ...
Choosing the right approach is critical with cloud monitoring in hybrid environments. Otherwise, you may drive up costs with features you don’t need and risk diminishing the visibility of your on-premises IT ...
Consumers ranked the marketing strategies and missteps that most significantly impact brand trust, which 73% say is their biggest motivator to share first-party data, according to The Rules of the Marketing Game, a 2023 report from Pantheon ...
Digital experience monitoring is the practice of monitoring and analyzing the complete digital user journey of your applications, websites, APIs, and other digital services. It involves tracking the performance of your web application from the perspective of the end user, providing detailed insights on user experience, app performance, and customer satisfaction ...
Enterprises are experiencing a 13% year-over-year increase in customer-facing incidents, reflecting rising levels of complexity and risk as businesses drive operational transformation at scale, according to the 2024 State of Digital Operations study from PagerDuty ...
According to Grafana Labs' 2024 Observability Survey, it doesn't matter what industry a company is in or the number of employees they have, the truth is: the more mature their observability practices are, the more time and money they save. From AI to OpenTelemetry — here are four key takeaways from this year's report ...
In an age where technology evolves at a breakneck pace, it's crucial to explore how AI assistants can revolutionize our work processes and daily lives, ultimately enhancing overall performance ...
