Skip to main content

Gartner: 40% of Organizations Deploying AI Will Use AI Observability to Monitor Model Performance by 2028

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner, Inc.

"AI is everywhere, but most organizations are still figuring out how to monitor and trust these systems," said Padraig Byrne, VP Analyst at Gartner. "That visibility gap makes scaling risky and that's why observability matters. Unlike traditional software, AI's decision making is often hidden, making it hard to explain or trust, yet errors can cause substantial financial loss, reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny."

Gartner defines observability as the characteristic of software and systems that enables them to be understood based on their outputs and enables questions about their behavior to be answered. AI observability requires dedicated tools that manage and assess the behavior, decision-making and risks of an AI solution, such as model drift, bias and LLM logic.

"The shift to specialized AI observability tools is accelerating due to executive concern over risk management in complex AI models and agentic AI, not just for infrastructure or application health," said Byrne. "There's a growing need for predictive issue detection and real-time actionable insights in AI models. Failure to adopt these tools exposes organizations to significant governance risks."

According to Gartner research, AI observability also includes the ability to monitor the availability, performance and accuracy of the AI platforms beyond risk and trust, which becomes essential as enterprises increasingly rely on AI-driven outcomes for decision-making.

"Without clear, standardized model telemetry, infrastructure and operations (I&O) teams face prolonged incident resolution times for AI applications, which will require complex manual efforts to trace and debug the behaviors of opaque deep learning models," said Byrne. "Dedicated AI observability provides the necessary mechanisms to monitor and mitigate algorithmic risk, establishing the technical foundation for widespread enterprise AI trust and adoption."

Gartner recommends I&O leaders factor the following steps into their AI platform strategies:

1. Establish mandatory AI model monitoring policies for all production deployments, requiring continuous tracking of fairness, drift and data quality metrics.

2. Standardize monitoring frameworks across data science, MLOps and engineering teams to ensure consistency and control. This mitigates organizational silos and streamlines issue resolution.

3. Prioritize infrastructure capable of ingesting and analyzing high-volume model telemetry, focusing on specialized solutions that support distributed tracing of AI inference calls.

4. Ensure IT strategies include provisions for future monitoring of AI platform performance, detection of shadow IT activity and cost management to address these challenges as the technology matures.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

Gartner: 40% of Organizations Deploying AI Will Use AI Observability to Monitor Model Performance by 2028

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner, Inc.

"AI is everywhere, but most organizations are still figuring out how to monitor and trust these systems," said Padraig Byrne, VP Analyst at Gartner. "That visibility gap makes scaling risky and that's why observability matters. Unlike traditional software, AI's decision making is often hidden, making it hard to explain or trust, yet errors can cause substantial financial loss, reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny."

Gartner defines observability as the characteristic of software and systems that enables them to be understood based on their outputs and enables questions about their behavior to be answered. AI observability requires dedicated tools that manage and assess the behavior, decision-making and risks of an AI solution, such as model drift, bias and LLM logic.

"The shift to specialized AI observability tools is accelerating due to executive concern over risk management in complex AI models and agentic AI, not just for infrastructure or application health," said Byrne. "There's a growing need for predictive issue detection and real-time actionable insights in AI models. Failure to adopt these tools exposes organizations to significant governance risks."

According to Gartner research, AI observability also includes the ability to monitor the availability, performance and accuracy of the AI platforms beyond risk and trust, which becomes essential as enterprises increasingly rely on AI-driven outcomes for decision-making.

"Without clear, standardized model telemetry, infrastructure and operations (I&O) teams face prolonged incident resolution times for AI applications, which will require complex manual efforts to trace and debug the behaviors of opaque deep learning models," said Byrne. "Dedicated AI observability provides the necessary mechanisms to monitor and mitigate algorithmic risk, establishing the technical foundation for widespread enterprise AI trust and adoption."

Gartner recommends I&O leaders factor the following steps into their AI platform strategies:

1. Establish mandatory AI model monitoring policies for all production deployments, requiring continuous tracking of fairness, drift and data quality metrics.

2. Standardize monitoring frameworks across data science, MLOps and engineering teams to ensure consistency and control. This mitigates organizational silos and streamlines issue resolution.

3. Prioritize infrastructure capable of ingesting and analyzing high-volume model telemetry, focusing on specialized solutions that support distributed tracing of AI inference calls.

4. Ensure IT strategies include provisions for future monitoring of AI platform performance, detection of shadow IT activity and cost management to address these challenges as the technology matures.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...