Skip to main content

How Big Data And Predictive Analytics Fit Perfectly with APM

Navin Israni
Arkenea

Do you want to be absolutely certain about what experience your application is delivering to your users? Do you want to quantify your app’s performance?

Application Performance Management (APM) is a set of tools that helps businesses monitor the application’s performance in terms of its capacity and levels of service. APM tools measure the application’s performance by monitoring all of its subsystems — the servers, the virtualization layers, the dependencies, and its components. 

As the data generated by organizations grows, APM tools are now required to do a lot more than basic monitoring of metrics. Modern data is often raw and unstructured and requires more advanced methods of analysis. The tools must help dig deep into this data for both forensic analysis and predictive analysis.

To extract more accurate and cheaper insights, modern APM tools use Big Data techniques to store, access, and analyze the multi-dimensional data.

The first advantage of using Big Data is that agents can simply "look at" insights without having to derive them with experiments or data sampling. Because data from multiple "infrastructure universes" is available on the dashboard, it also saves their time usually spent in running queries and testing assumptions.

Big Data can be useful in many more ways.

1. The analysis it presents is definite, not circumstantial

If the team spends time on testing based on prior experience and the analysis fails to confirm that assumption, it is simply a waste of time. When conducting a root-cause analysis of any issue, it’s important to eliminate scenarios to avoid going in the wrong direction. 

However, because Big Data analyzes all possible data sources, agents don’t miss any data. They definitively discard faulty assumptions without having to test them.

With the help of Big Data supporting tools, admins can identify unique signatures of attacks by analyzing data from several tools across all architectural layers.

2. Diagnosis of intermittent and user-triggered errors gets easier

The back-end environment of the application may not be fully apparent when major errors must be resolved intermittently. It’s also hard to predict when these errors will recur. Moreover, observing the progression of these errors becomes difficult as these environments undergo evolution over time.

Big Data helps extract valuable insights to help improve the user experience. This makes user experience analytics one of the most attractive benefits of Big Data-powered apps.

With a Big Data approach, ops teams can diagnose quickly as these tools capture data continuously. This makes the life of diagnosis teams much simpler as all the forensic data is available regardless of the state of the environment or the timing of the problem.

When the source of the error is a user action, an APM tool that integrates Big Data will swoop in and capture a snapshot of all the components in all layers of the environment. This allows agents to trace the action directly and definitively to the exact problem.

3. Error prediction improves the quality of the app

Quality assurance is one of the most important aspects of creating web apps. Whether you are using an app builder or hiring a custom agency, errors can still occur long after you have developed and deployed the app.

Therefore, you have to plan for QA tasks during the maintenance phase of the application too. 

In this phase, often the agents would simply focus on solving problems that do occur. That means they may ignore any signs of future problems; they let the wounds fester without doing anything about it. 

But can agents proactively find out problems?

APM Big Data helps do just that. With the highly detailed environment data, agents can spot anomalies and take actions to fix them before they result in massive errors. 

Unforeseen use cases can be studied with the certainty of rich, actionable insights as they happen. Robust apps that catch all possible errors are hard to create in the first release. But with APM and Big Data Analytics, patterns can be found to predict future errors and take proactive steps to prevent them.

Final Words

There is no fixed amount that qualifies a dataset for Big Data applications. However, complex unstructured data being used for innovative and unconventional applications definitely makes the APM technology a candidate for Big Data. 

Big Data technologies can analyze data from not just the app’s infrastructure, but also provide a complete and instantaneous snapshot of its ecosystem as well.

Navin Israni is a Senior Content Writer at Arkenea

Hot Topics

The Latest

Performance bottlenecks aren't uncommon when it comes to rolling out new technology, regardless of how capable or game-changing that technology might be. Every generation of new tech has encountered roadblocks that had to be overcome before it was truly able to shine. Virtualization forced organizations to rethink resource allocation, cloud transformation had us shift our focus toward scalability and elasticity, and microservices introduced entirely new challenges around observability and distributed systems. There's something different about AI, however ...

Consider a single order represented across order-management, execution, and settlement systems. Each database, message broker, and application may be online and processing its own records correctly. Yet the workflow has failed if related events arrive on different clocks, rely on inconsistent state, or cannot be reconciled before an operational decision must be made ...

AI now exists in almost every IT workflow. In a recent survey of more than 800 IT service professionals, all respondents indicated the use of AI in some form within their organization. But there's a growing paradox: if dashboards are clearing faster and alerts are resolved at unprecedented speed, why aren't IT service desks reporting lighter workloads? The research found that 71% of IT teams said their actual workload has remained flat or increased since adopting AI. This reality appears to contradict what we’ve been told about AI ...

Two years ago, almost every customer conversation about AI started with the same questions: Which model should we use? What can it do? Is it ready for the enterprise? Today, those discussions have moved on. CIOs are far more interested in how to govern AI, integrate it with existing systems, prepare their workforce and make it part of everyday operations. The challenge is no longer to prove that AI can deliver value. It's instead about how to embed AI into the business in a way that's secure, scalable and delivers measurable outcomes ...

Two things happened to production incidents between 2023 and now, and they did not happen at the same speed. The first is that a class of dependency that barely existed three years ago now accounts for one incident in ten. Incidents disclosed by AI model and AI application providers rose from 1.7% of all disclosed unplanned incidents in 2023 to 10.7% in 2026 year to date, roughly a sixfold rise; that counts only incidents at AI companies themselves, so the true share is higher. The second is that the time to close an incident has not come down ...

When an AI assistant gives an incomplete or incorrect answer, teams often blame the model. They adjust prompts, switch models, increase context windows or test a new retrieval strategy. However the model may not be a problem. In many enterprise AI workflows, the problem begins inside the document-ingestion pipeline ...

If you talk to any security or observability teams right now, they're all fighting the same fire: their tooling was built to ingest X, but their sources are pumping Y and soon to be doing Z. The knee-jerk reaction is always the same: we need more platform. However, this reaction is wrong. Let me explain why, because the solution to this problem is foundational, not financial. Instead of hurling yet more money at the problem, make sure you've done what's needed upstream ...

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

How Big Data And Predictive Analytics Fit Perfectly with APM

Navin Israni
Arkenea

Do you want to be absolutely certain about what experience your application is delivering to your users? Do you want to quantify your app’s performance?

Application Performance Management (APM) is a set of tools that helps businesses monitor the application’s performance in terms of its capacity and levels of service. APM tools measure the application’s performance by monitoring all of its subsystems — the servers, the virtualization layers, the dependencies, and its components. 

As the data generated by organizations grows, APM tools are now required to do a lot more than basic monitoring of metrics. Modern data is often raw and unstructured and requires more advanced methods of analysis. The tools must help dig deep into this data for both forensic analysis and predictive analysis.

To extract more accurate and cheaper insights, modern APM tools use Big Data techniques to store, access, and analyze the multi-dimensional data.

The first advantage of using Big Data is that agents can simply "look at" insights without having to derive them with experiments or data sampling. Because data from multiple "infrastructure universes" is available on the dashboard, it also saves their time usually spent in running queries and testing assumptions.

Big Data can be useful in many more ways.

1. The analysis it presents is definite, not circumstantial

If the team spends time on testing based on prior experience and the analysis fails to confirm that assumption, it is simply a waste of time. When conducting a root-cause analysis of any issue, it’s important to eliminate scenarios to avoid going in the wrong direction. 

However, because Big Data analyzes all possible data sources, agents don’t miss any data. They definitively discard faulty assumptions without having to test them.

With the help of Big Data supporting tools, admins can identify unique signatures of attacks by analyzing data from several tools across all architectural layers.

2. Diagnosis of intermittent and user-triggered errors gets easier

The back-end environment of the application may not be fully apparent when major errors must be resolved intermittently. It’s also hard to predict when these errors will recur. Moreover, observing the progression of these errors becomes difficult as these environments undergo evolution over time.

Big Data helps extract valuable insights to help improve the user experience. This makes user experience analytics one of the most attractive benefits of Big Data-powered apps.

With a Big Data approach, ops teams can diagnose quickly as these tools capture data continuously. This makes the life of diagnosis teams much simpler as all the forensic data is available regardless of the state of the environment or the timing of the problem.

When the source of the error is a user action, an APM tool that integrates Big Data will swoop in and capture a snapshot of all the components in all layers of the environment. This allows agents to trace the action directly and definitively to the exact problem.

3. Error prediction improves the quality of the app

Quality assurance is one of the most important aspects of creating web apps. Whether you are using an app builder or hiring a custom agency, errors can still occur long after you have developed and deployed the app.

Therefore, you have to plan for QA tasks during the maintenance phase of the application too. 

In this phase, often the agents would simply focus on solving problems that do occur. That means they may ignore any signs of future problems; they let the wounds fester without doing anything about it. 

But can agents proactively find out problems?

APM Big Data helps do just that. With the highly detailed environment data, agents can spot anomalies and take actions to fix them before they result in massive errors. 

Unforeseen use cases can be studied with the certainty of rich, actionable insights as they happen. Robust apps that catch all possible errors are hard to create in the first release. But with APM and Big Data Analytics, patterns can be found to predict future errors and take proactive steps to prevent them.

Final Words

There is no fixed amount that qualifies a dataset for Big Data applications. However, complex unstructured data being used for innovative and unconventional applications definitely makes the APM technology a candidate for Big Data. 

Big Data technologies can analyze data from not just the app’s infrastructure, but also provide a complete and instantaneous snapshot of its ecosystem as well.

Navin Israni is a Senior Content Writer at Arkenea

Hot Topics

The Latest

Performance bottlenecks aren't uncommon when it comes to rolling out new technology, regardless of how capable or game-changing that technology might be. Every generation of new tech has encountered roadblocks that had to be overcome before it was truly able to shine. Virtualization forced organizations to rethink resource allocation, cloud transformation had us shift our focus toward scalability and elasticity, and microservices introduced entirely new challenges around observability and distributed systems. There's something different about AI, however ...

Consider a single order represented across order-management, execution, and settlement systems. Each database, message broker, and application may be online and processing its own records correctly. Yet the workflow has failed if related events arrive on different clocks, rely on inconsistent state, or cannot be reconciled before an operational decision must be made ...

AI now exists in almost every IT workflow. In a recent survey of more than 800 IT service professionals, all respondents indicated the use of AI in some form within their organization. But there's a growing paradox: if dashboards are clearing faster and alerts are resolved at unprecedented speed, why aren't IT service desks reporting lighter workloads? The research found that 71% of IT teams said their actual workload has remained flat or increased since adopting AI. This reality appears to contradict what we’ve been told about AI ...

Two years ago, almost every customer conversation about AI started with the same questions: Which model should we use? What can it do? Is it ready for the enterprise? Today, those discussions have moved on. CIOs are far more interested in how to govern AI, integrate it with existing systems, prepare their workforce and make it part of everyday operations. The challenge is no longer to prove that AI can deliver value. It's instead about how to embed AI into the business in a way that's secure, scalable and delivers measurable outcomes ...

Two things happened to production incidents between 2023 and now, and they did not happen at the same speed. The first is that a class of dependency that barely existed three years ago now accounts for one incident in ten. Incidents disclosed by AI model and AI application providers rose from 1.7% of all disclosed unplanned incidents in 2023 to 10.7% in 2026 year to date, roughly a sixfold rise; that counts only incidents at AI companies themselves, so the true share is higher. The second is that the time to close an incident has not come down ...

When an AI assistant gives an incomplete or incorrect answer, teams often blame the model. They adjust prompts, switch models, increase context windows or test a new retrieval strategy. However the model may not be a problem. In many enterprise AI workflows, the problem begins inside the document-ingestion pipeline ...

If you talk to any security or observability teams right now, they're all fighting the same fire: their tooling was built to ingest X, but their sources are pumping Y and soon to be doing Z. The knee-jerk reaction is always the same: we need more platform. However, this reaction is wrong. Let me explain why, because the solution to this problem is foundational, not financial. Instead of hurling yet more money at the problem, make sure you've done what's needed upstream ...

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...