Skip to main content

How IT Teams Can Unleash the True Potential of AIOps Through 5 Levels of Maturity

Sean McDermott
Windward Consulting Group

Over the last few years, the need and market for artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) has grown significantly as enterprises look for solutions to scale operations while improving customer experience and overall satisfaction. As the need grows, it's predicted that 40% of organizations will implement an AIOps solution by 2022, and 55% of organizations leverage modern IT operations tools like AIOps to improve overall customer satisfaction.

While many of today's enterprises view AIOps as just another tool in the stack hoping to solve age-old problems, AIOps should be viewed as a holistic, long-term strategy. But before IT teams can envision long-term success, they must develop a foundation that both deploys modern machine learning and automation and allows them to track progress. In turn, this creates transparency throughout the organization and gives IT teams an opportunity to show their value.

I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success.

Here's what enterprises should know about the five levels of AIOps maturity:

Level 1: Reactive

When teams are in the first stage of AIOps maturity, siloed operations hinder communication with the rest of the business, leaving IT teams in constant reactive mode as they collect events and logs. IT teams become firefighters attempting to balance putting out internal fires while ensuring customers are satisfied. Additionally, because their time is spent solving major issues in reactive mode, they miss the opportunity to showcase their value to the rest of the business and help produce proactive strategies.

Level 2: Integrated

In the second level of AIOps maturity, operational silos become less of a barrier, and communication between IT teams and other departments becomes easier and more frequent. Additionally, data sources start to weave into a unified architecture and IT service management (ITSM) processes are improved significantly. Teams also begin to layer artificial intelligence and machine learning into the process.

Level 3: Analytical

Teams begin to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the analytical level of AIOps maturity. They can define more baseline metrics to share with the rest of the organization. In turn, this gives them the opportunity to leverage data to show the overall value of IT and AIOps as it relates to overarching business goals and objectives.

Level 4: Prescriptive

By the fourth level, IT teams have nearly mastered the use of ML and automation to continue improving processes and showing value to stakeholders. In addition, the prescriptive stage optimizes the approach to ITSM processes.

Level 5: Automated

In the fifth level of AIOps maturity, full automation is implemented with little to no human interaction. Teams see complete transparency throughout the organization as they leverage ML through prescriptive models. Finally, teams are able to sit at the executive table and play a more strategic role in improving the business operations, while automation works in the background to keep the lights on.

As teams look to implement AIOps and navigate through each level of maturity, they achieve the true potential AIOps provides them, ultimately preparing them for long-term success.

Sean McDermott is the Founder of Windward Consulting Group and RedMonocle

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...

How IT Teams Can Unleash the True Potential of AIOps Through 5 Levels of Maturity

Sean McDermott
Windward Consulting Group

Over the last few years, the need and market for artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) has grown significantly as enterprises look for solutions to scale operations while improving customer experience and overall satisfaction. As the need grows, it's predicted that 40% of organizations will implement an AIOps solution by 2022, and 55% of organizations leverage modern IT operations tools like AIOps to improve overall customer satisfaction.

While many of today's enterprises view AIOps as just another tool in the stack hoping to solve age-old problems, AIOps should be viewed as a holistic, long-term strategy. But before IT teams can envision long-term success, they must develop a foundation that both deploys modern machine learning and automation and allows them to track progress. In turn, this creates transparency throughout the organization and gives IT teams an opportunity to show their value.

I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success.

Here's what enterprises should know about the five levels of AIOps maturity:

Level 1: Reactive

When teams are in the first stage of AIOps maturity, siloed operations hinder communication with the rest of the business, leaving IT teams in constant reactive mode as they collect events and logs. IT teams become firefighters attempting to balance putting out internal fires while ensuring customers are satisfied. Additionally, because their time is spent solving major issues in reactive mode, they miss the opportunity to showcase their value to the rest of the business and help produce proactive strategies.

Level 2: Integrated

In the second level of AIOps maturity, operational silos become less of a barrier, and communication between IT teams and other departments becomes easier and more frequent. Additionally, data sources start to weave into a unified architecture and IT service management (ITSM) processes are improved significantly. Teams also begin to layer artificial intelligence and machine learning into the process.

Level 3: Analytical

Teams begin to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the analytical level of AIOps maturity. They can define more baseline metrics to share with the rest of the organization. In turn, this gives them the opportunity to leverage data to show the overall value of IT and AIOps as it relates to overarching business goals and objectives.

Level 4: Prescriptive

By the fourth level, IT teams have nearly mastered the use of ML and automation to continue improving processes and showing value to stakeholders. In addition, the prescriptive stage optimizes the approach to ITSM processes.

Level 5: Automated

In the fifth level of AIOps maturity, full automation is implemented with little to no human interaction. Teams see complete transparency throughout the organization as they leverage ML through prescriptive models. Finally, teams are able to sit at the executive table and play a more strategic role in improving the business operations, while automation works in the background to keep the lights on.

As teams look to implement AIOps and navigate through each level of maturity, they achieve the true potential AIOps provides them, ultimately preparing them for long-term success.

Sean McDermott is the Founder of Windward Consulting Group and RedMonocle

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...