Skip to main content

Integrating Security and Compliance Teams to Curb Modern Risks

Colin Fallwell
Sumo Logic

As the world's technology rapidly evolved and threats skyrocketed in the cloud, the need for security and compliance teams to come together to protect organizations and their customers has never been more important. Unfortunately, this hasn't happened yet.


In partnership with Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), we polled 204 technology and business leaders in North America from more than ten industry verticals to investigate this theme. The research found that most organizations recognize the importance of managing both compliance and security functions in-house. Nearly 83% of respondents said that a corporate employee was responsible for information security and 88% said that IT audit and compliance functions are also handled internally.

Yet, while most organizations run internal compliance and security teams, their status is not weighted equally. Compliance imperatives typically drive security priorities. However, organizations' combined security and compliance postures will be better served when both teams work together, and budgets and investments should reflect that equal importance.

Key takeaways from the research include:

Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered

Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered. They often operate with different teams, budgets and investment levels, but they need to work together to better protect the organization's posture instead.

■ 47% said that IT owns the security budget, while 11% noted that compliance is the security budget owner.

■ In the future, 86% of those surveyed plan to make a significant investment in compliance solutions and data privacy, while just over half (52%) will make a significant investment in a security management suite.

Compliance challenges amplified by rapidly growing IT environments

Compliance challenges are amplified by rapidly growing and global IT environments with different regulatory climates.

■ 39% of respondents said having multiple IT environments with different requirements is their primary compliance challenge.

■ 40% of organizations have postponed security projects to address regulatory compliance concerns.

■ 68% believe their regulatory compliance programs are a competitive differentiator.

■ 75% said that they are using existing tools or evaluating new tools to address data privacy.

compliance needs driving cybersecurity priorities

Organizations' compliance needs are driving cybersecurity priorities, causing teams to alter security strategies to align with requirements.

■ 67% said that data privacy regulations like GDPR, CCPA or changing data controls were their biggest compliance challenges.

■ 38% said that data security and privacy was the greatest security challenge in their organization

■ 25% stated that information security projects are dependent on compliance projects

■ 76% said that compliance has completely or significantly shifted their security strategy

Compliance and security teams must work together

Compliance and security teams must work together to best manage a mature and robust program, while maintaining numerous attestations and controls globally.

■ 89% indicated that the priorities of the security and compliance teams were aligned.

■ 85% stated that the security tools used adequately address compliance considerations.

■ 59% indicated that data privacy regulations have impacted their approach to security.

Integrated Security and Compliance Solutions

This survey also signaled the growing demand for integrated security and compliance solutions that increase visibility while mitigating emerging threats and privacy regulations. When organizations prioritize DevSecOps, they can better maintain compliance, especially as they are expected to comply with multiple standards, including PCI, HIPAA, PII, SOC and GDPR, in highly regulated industries.

It is undeniable that all organizations will benefit from incorporating a security-centric culture and fostering better collaboration between security and compliance teams. Organizations must adopt solutions that provide real-time monitoring for continuous compliance and help maintain system security.

Colin Fallwell is Field CTO of Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, traditional observability tools have forced IT professionals to sift through endless dashboards, turning a flood of alerts into actionable insight and driving widespread burnout. While enterprises adopted AI to eliminate this friction, most still deploy it reactively rather than proactively ... As systems become more complex and IT moves to the center of business strategy, a reactive posture is unsustainable ...

Ask an operations team what they monitor and you will hear a familiar list: latency, errors, throughput, uptime. Those signals still matter for AI, but they no longer answer the most important question. As Krishna Sai, CTO of SolarWinds, puts it: "Traditional observability tells you a system is running. AI observability tells you whether it's still reasoning soundly. Those are completely different questions" ...

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

Integrating Security and Compliance Teams to Curb Modern Risks

Colin Fallwell
Sumo Logic

As the world's technology rapidly evolved and threats skyrocketed in the cloud, the need for security and compliance teams to come together to protect organizations and their customers has never been more important. Unfortunately, this hasn't happened yet.


In partnership with Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), we polled 204 technology and business leaders in North America from more than ten industry verticals to investigate this theme. The research found that most organizations recognize the importance of managing both compliance and security functions in-house. Nearly 83% of respondents said that a corporate employee was responsible for information security and 88% said that IT audit and compliance functions are also handled internally.

Yet, while most organizations run internal compliance and security teams, their status is not weighted equally. Compliance imperatives typically drive security priorities. However, organizations' combined security and compliance postures will be better served when both teams work together, and budgets and investments should reflect that equal importance.

Key takeaways from the research include:

Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered

Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered. They often operate with different teams, budgets and investment levels, but they need to work together to better protect the organization's posture instead.

■ 47% said that IT owns the security budget, while 11% noted that compliance is the security budget owner.

■ In the future, 86% of those surveyed plan to make a significant investment in compliance solutions and data privacy, while just over half (52%) will make a significant investment in a security management suite.

Compliance challenges amplified by rapidly growing IT environments

Compliance challenges are amplified by rapidly growing and global IT environments with different regulatory climates.

■ 39% of respondents said having multiple IT environments with different requirements is their primary compliance challenge.

■ 40% of organizations have postponed security projects to address regulatory compliance concerns.

■ 68% believe their regulatory compliance programs are a competitive differentiator.

■ 75% said that they are using existing tools or evaluating new tools to address data privacy.

compliance needs driving cybersecurity priorities

Organizations' compliance needs are driving cybersecurity priorities, causing teams to alter security strategies to align with requirements.

■ 67% said that data privacy regulations like GDPR, CCPA or changing data controls were their biggest compliance challenges.

■ 38% said that data security and privacy was the greatest security challenge in their organization

■ 25% stated that information security projects are dependent on compliance projects

■ 76% said that compliance has completely or significantly shifted their security strategy

Compliance and security teams must work together

Compliance and security teams must work together to best manage a mature and robust program, while maintaining numerous attestations and controls globally.

■ 89% indicated that the priorities of the security and compliance teams were aligned.

■ 85% stated that the security tools used adequately address compliance considerations.

■ 59% indicated that data privacy regulations have impacted their approach to security.

Integrated Security and Compliance Solutions

This survey also signaled the growing demand for integrated security and compliance solutions that increase visibility while mitigating emerging threats and privacy regulations. When organizations prioritize DevSecOps, they can better maintain compliance, especially as they are expected to comply with multiple standards, including PCI, HIPAA, PII, SOC and GDPR, in highly regulated industries.

It is undeniable that all organizations will benefit from incorporating a security-centric culture and fostering better collaboration between security and compliance teams. Organizations must adopt solutions that provide real-time monitoring for continuous compliance and help maintain system security.

Colin Fallwell is Field CTO of Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, traditional observability tools have forced IT professionals to sift through endless dashboards, turning a flood of alerts into actionable insight and driving widespread burnout. While enterprises adopted AI to eliminate this friction, most still deploy it reactively rather than proactively ... As systems become more complex and IT moves to the center of business strategy, a reactive posture is unsustainable ...

Ask an operations team what they monitor and you will hear a familiar list: latency, errors, throughput, uptime. Those signals still matter for AI, but they no longer answer the most important question. As Krishna Sai, CTO of SolarWinds, puts it: "Traditional observability tells you a system is running. AI observability tells you whether it's still reasoning soundly. Those are completely different questions" ...

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...