Skip to main content

IT Leaders Struggle to Demonstrate Cloud ROI

While the FinOps discipline is robust and proven, executives appear to be overconfident, according to Performance vs. Perception: The FinOps Execution Gap, a new report from CloudBolt Software

Many label their FinOps practices as mature and automated, which stands in stark contrast with the reality:

  • 78% of respondents admit difficulty in consistently demonstrating cloud ROI, which they defined primarily as revenue growth (43%), followed by operational efficiency/productivity (36%), and then cost savings (35%).
  • 98% agree that Kubernetes is becoming a major driver of cloud spend, but 91% remain unable to effectively optimize their Kubernetes clusters, signaling a critical blind spot as container adoption grows.
  • 66% report mostly to fully automated environments for cloud waste management and cloud spend optimization. Yet 58% of respondents say it takes weeks or months to detect and fully remediate cloud-cost waste opportunities. This calls into question the assertion of a truly automated approach for the majority of respondents.

"FinOps as a discipline is more sound than ever and continues to evolve effectively," says Kyle Campos, CTPO at CloudBolt. "But a good percentage of organizations may be taking a victory lap before even navigating the first turn. Through this research, it's evident that while a majority indicate they believe they've achieved FinOps maturity, the data shows they are still in the early stages of operationalizing and optimizing FinOps practices. Confidence in lieu of measurable progress obscures reality and hinders the improvement necessary for significant business impact."

The report details key barriers to stronger ROI on cloud investments, with:

  • 55% of respondents citing difficulty linking cloud spend directly to business outcomes.
  • 48% blaming organizational misalignment and operational silos.
  • 44% noting inefficient resource management, including poor tagging and inconsistent accountability.

Further, the report identifies private cloud/data centers as playing a key role in the ROI equation:

  • Hybrid multi-cloud management was identified as the top priority by 42% of respondents.
  • 39% say hybrid cloud management will be a "funded priority" for their organization over the next 6-12 months, only topped by AI/ML cloud-cost optimization (FinOps for AI) at 40%.

"Leaders believe they have visibility into their cloud spend. Yet without necessary governance, enforcement, and effective remediation, they are doing little to reduce the insight-to-action gap — the time it takes to go from 'we have a problem' to 'problem fixed and cost optimized.' This leads to persistent inefficiencies and inflated costs," Campos adds. "Kubernetes and AI-driven workloads especially highlight this disconnect — rapid adoption without proper operational control and automated actions (both retrospective and proactive) is dramatically affecting return on investment. If FinOps practices are not focusing on continuous optimization and employing the capabilities to execute on that, organizations will continue to struggle to effectively show cloud ROI."

Methodology: Conducted in collaboration with Wakefield Research, the study surveyed 350 senior IT leaders in the US across a wide range of industries to assess the current state of FinOps practices.

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

IT Leaders Struggle to Demonstrate Cloud ROI

While the FinOps discipline is robust and proven, executives appear to be overconfident, according to Performance vs. Perception: The FinOps Execution Gap, a new report from CloudBolt Software

Many label their FinOps practices as mature and automated, which stands in stark contrast with the reality:

  • 78% of respondents admit difficulty in consistently demonstrating cloud ROI, which they defined primarily as revenue growth (43%), followed by operational efficiency/productivity (36%), and then cost savings (35%).
  • 98% agree that Kubernetes is becoming a major driver of cloud spend, but 91% remain unable to effectively optimize their Kubernetes clusters, signaling a critical blind spot as container adoption grows.
  • 66% report mostly to fully automated environments for cloud waste management and cloud spend optimization. Yet 58% of respondents say it takes weeks or months to detect and fully remediate cloud-cost waste opportunities. This calls into question the assertion of a truly automated approach for the majority of respondents.

"FinOps as a discipline is more sound than ever and continues to evolve effectively," says Kyle Campos, CTPO at CloudBolt. "But a good percentage of organizations may be taking a victory lap before even navigating the first turn. Through this research, it's evident that while a majority indicate they believe they've achieved FinOps maturity, the data shows they are still in the early stages of operationalizing and optimizing FinOps practices. Confidence in lieu of measurable progress obscures reality and hinders the improvement necessary for significant business impact."

The report details key barriers to stronger ROI on cloud investments, with:

  • 55% of respondents citing difficulty linking cloud spend directly to business outcomes.
  • 48% blaming organizational misalignment and operational silos.
  • 44% noting inefficient resource management, including poor tagging and inconsistent accountability.

Further, the report identifies private cloud/data centers as playing a key role in the ROI equation:

  • Hybrid multi-cloud management was identified as the top priority by 42% of respondents.
  • 39% say hybrid cloud management will be a "funded priority" for their organization over the next 6-12 months, only topped by AI/ML cloud-cost optimization (FinOps for AI) at 40%.

"Leaders believe they have visibility into their cloud spend. Yet without necessary governance, enforcement, and effective remediation, they are doing little to reduce the insight-to-action gap — the time it takes to go from 'we have a problem' to 'problem fixed and cost optimized.' This leads to persistent inefficiencies and inflated costs," Campos adds. "Kubernetes and AI-driven workloads especially highlight this disconnect — rapid adoption without proper operational control and automated actions (both retrospective and proactive) is dramatically affecting return on investment. If FinOps practices are not focusing on continuous optimization and employing the capabilities to execute on that, organizations will continue to struggle to effectively show cloud ROI."

Methodology: Conducted in collaboration with Wakefield Research, the study surveyed 350 senior IT leaders in the US across a wide range of industries to assess the current state of FinOps practices.

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...