Skip to main content

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...

Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...

Enterprise networks rarely behave the same way for very long. A routing adjustment in one region may unexpectedly alter application performance in another. A cloud migration may introduce hidden dependencies that go unnoticed until an outage occurs. All the while, the network is managed by several different teams, each of whom use different tool sets — and as a result, have different views of the network ... There’s usually an engineer who remembers why traffic fails over a certain way between sites, or which transparent firewall was added where. The problem is that human memory cannot scale alongside enterprise-scale networks ...

Ask an infrastructure team how confident they are in their ability to govern AI, and most will tell you they've got it handled. A recent survey of 406 IT decision-makers and platform engineering leaders found 86% expressing exactly that confidence. Ask the same group whether they have a formal written AI governance policy, and the number drops to 30%, according to Spacelift's Infrastructure Automation Report ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 27, Shamus McGillicuddy, EMA VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, and Parker Hathcock, EMA Research Director covering IT Service/Operations (ServiceOps), discuss observability unification in modern IT operations ... 

Virtual Private Networks became a cornerstone of enterprise security at a time when corporate infrastructure looked very different from today ... For years, this model worked well. But the architecture behind VPNs assumed a centralized corporate environment—one where the network itself was the hub of activity. In a cloud — first world, that assumption no longer holds ...

Website outages get resolved just as fast in August as they do in November. I went looking for the opposite: the summer slowdown everyone assumes is there once the people who fix things are away. It isn't in the data we collected, covering 1.8 million confirmed outages across tens of thousands of websites ...

This year, many of the cloud infrastructure contracts signed in the early days of the AI boom will come up for renewal. As the year goes on, I anticipate we'll see a significant amount of cloud vendor swapouts and multi-cloud adoption, and the reason isn't just GPU depreciation. It's because they're tired of their current cloud providers ...

There's a moment the many observability teams have experienced days into bringing a new service into production: you realize that the vendor's claims of "intelligent" behavior included a large serving of hype. Their dashboards look nice until they don't, the failure modes are a black box, and no one on the team can confidently explain why the system did what it did at 2 am. Agentic AI is about to force every Ops team to relive that moment at web-scale until they start treating these systems as the dependencies they actually are ...