Looking Back at 2017 APM Predictions - Did They Come True? Part 1
January 09, 2018

Jonah Kowall
AppDynamics

Share this

I enjoy the end of the year. Getting some downtime from the constant phone calls and meetings allows me to reflect and plan for a new year ... Planning for a new year often includes predicting what’s going to happen. However, we don't often enough look back at the prior year’s predictions to see if they actually came to fruition. That is the purpose of this analysis. I have picked out a few key areas in APMdigest's 2017 Application Performance Management Predictions, and analyzed which predictions actually came true.

Many of the 2017 predictions were not particularly predictive, but instead "observations" of what is happening and how it will accelerate or shift. Without better ground rules for what a prediction is, it's hard to say what the list is and is not. I have picked out a few key areas which encompass several of these predictions. I'm not calling out the individual predictions, which often do not align with Application Performance Management (APM) trends, but instead, serve a specific vendor (gotta love Marketing).

Review the 2017 APM Predictions on APMdigest

The first four key areas below are the predictions that didn’t come true. In addition to the the ones I have called out here, there were many predictions which have been failing for years that vendors wish would come true. Unfortunately for them, that didn't happen in 2017. Hopefully, they don't post the same prediction for 2018. :)

The following few 2017 predictions had several predictions which fell into a category:

The convergence of infrastructure metrics and APM metrics

Although many tools combine APM and infrastructure metrics, most enterprises still use separate tools due to organizational silos

Although many tools combine APM and infrastructure metrics, most enterprises still use separate tools due to organizational silos. The enterprises which run significant infrastructure continue to deploy monitoring tools for each team — meaning teams running data centers still buy tools for DCIM, network, servers, storage, and other infrastructure technologies. Those implementing cloud infrastructure often use cloud provider tools or other infrastructure monitoring tools which do a better job in those environments, and better handle time series. APM tools, have for a while had lightweight capabilities for infrastructure monitoring, and often may replace more capable infrastructure monitoring technologies, especially when migrating to managed data centers or public cloud.

Adoption of platforms to tie monitoring data together

While there are many products which attempt to tie together data coming from multiple monitoring tools, the integration posts challenges for most. Although some of these products are gaining adoption, it's not impactful to the market today. We haven't seen a shift in this market in 2017, and I doubt it will change in 2018.

AI replacing manual analysis

My perspective on AI is documented. AI is still not prominent in solutions today, even though people have been predicting it for years. The advances in making RCA faster have been helpful to users, but the manual analysis of data continues to be standard today, and likely will be for the foreseeable future. We didn't see a shift in 2017, but as I talk about below, predictive analysis and machine learning are becoming more prominent.

Data-centric to event-centric


BUT WILL BECOME TRUE AT SOME POINT

This one was ahead of its time and is a trend which has been occurring for several years. Instead of event-based systems replacing data based systems, I believe there will be an augmented platform to handle both request-response systems and data-based systems. There are many business reasons to have both capabilities within software architectures, and monitoring will naturally have to evolve to handle both types of software systems. Today most of the "event-based" monitoring systems are done with log analysis tools, as tracking events over time is often a challenge for most monitoring tools. There are some which have been able to show change over time, but not managing of event-based architectures. This will be a continuing trend driven by event-based programming and push models for notifications commonly found in technologies built on top of technology such as Node.js or other event-based frameworks.

Read Looking Back at 2017 APM Predictions - Did They Come True? Part 2, outlining the 2017 APM Predictions that came true.

Share this

The Latest

April 24, 2018

Managing emerging technologies such as Cloud, microservices and containers and SDx are driving organizations to redefine their IT monitoring strategies, according to a new study titled 17 Areas Shaping the Information Technology Operations Market in 2018 from Digital Enterprise Journal (DEJ) ...

April 23, 2018

Balancing digital innovation with security is critical to helping businesses deliver strong digital experiences, influencing factors such maintaining a competitive edge, customer satisfaction, customer trust, and risk mitigation. But some businesses struggle to meet that balance according to new data ...

April 19, 2018

In the course of researching, documenting and advising on user experience management needs and directions for more than a decade, I've found myself waging a quiet (and sometimes not so quiet) war with several industry assumptions. Chief among these is the notion that user experience management (UEM) is purely a subset of application performance management (APM). This APM-centricity misses some of UEM's most critical value points, and in a basic sense fails to recognize what UEM is truly about ...

April 18, 2018

We now live in the kind of connected world where established businesses that are not evolving digitally are in jeopardy of becoming extinct. New research shows companies are preparing to make digital transformation a priority in the near future. However most of them have a long way to go before achieving any kind of mastery over the multiple disciples required to effectively innovate ...

April 17, 2018

IT Transformation can result in bottom-line benefits that drive business differentiation, innovation and growth, according to new research conducted by Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) ...

April 16, 2018

While regulatory compliance is an important activity for medium to large businesses, easy and cost-effective solutions can be difficult to find. Network visibility is an often overlooked, but critically important, activity that can help lower costs and make life easier for IT personnel that are responsible for these regulatory compliance solutions ...

April 12, 2018

This is the third in a series of three blogs directed at recent EMA research on the digital war room. In this blog, we'll look at three areas that have emerged in a spotlight in and of themselves — as signs of changing times — let alone as they may impact digital war room decision making. They are the growing focus on development and agile/DevOps; the impacts of cloud; and the growing need for security and operations (SecOps) to team more effectively ...

April 11, 2018

As we've seen, hardware is at the root of a large proportion of data center outages, and the costs and consequences are often exacerbated when VMs are affected. The best answer, therefore, is for IT pros to get back to basics ...

April 10, 2018

Risk is relative. The Peltzman Effect describes how humans change behavior when risk factors are reduced. They often act more recklessly and drive risk right back up. The phenomenon is recognized by many economists, its effects have been studied in the field of medicine, and I'd argue it is at the root of an interesting trend in IT — namely the increasing cost of downtime despite our more reliable virtualized environments ...

April 09, 2018

How do enterprises prepare for the future that our Cloud Vision 2020 survey forecasts? I see three immediate takeaways to focus on ...