Skip to main content

Manufacturing Leaders Agree: AI Automation Is Important to Improve IT Efficiency and Deliver Improved Digital Experience

While there is high enthusiasm for AI — with 92% of those surveyed in the manufacturing industry confirming AI is a top C-Suite priority and 92% agree it provides a competitive advantage — only 32% of manufacturers are fully prepared to implement AI projects now, 5% lower than the overall industry average, according to Manufacturing sector results of the Riverbed Global AI & Digital Experience Survey.

Image
riverbed

Source: Kaizen

They recognize there are a number of challenges ranging from data quality to scalability which are impacting their ability to realize the full potential of AI technology. As AI continues to advance, manufacturers can achieve significant benefits including increased efficiency and productivity, improvements in product quality, optimizing inventory levels and production processes, and applying proactive data-driven decision making, all to collectively enhance and deliver a superior customer experience.

The next three years are anticipated to be a period of rapid expansion as enterprises seek practical AI approaches and solutions. By 2027, 83% of manufacturing leaders expect their organization to be fully prepared to implement their AI strategy and projects. During the same time period, AI is expected to mature and become a growth driver. Whereas today, 58% of leaders across manufacturing say the primary reason for using AI is to drive operational efficiencies over growth (42%), those numbers flip in 2027, with 65% of organizations saying AI will primarily be a growth driver versus driving efficiencies (35%). This sizable shift is one of the largest across all the industry sectors participating in the study.

Manufacturing leaders surveyed also said they expect to see many benefits through the use of AIOps, as 89% of manufacturers agree that AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver a superior digital experience for end users. Manufacturing leaders were asked to rank how they expect to use AI in their IT operations to improve Digital Employee Experience (DEX) within the next three years and the results revealed:

  • Workflow automation (80%)
  • Automated remediation (69%)
  • 24/7 support availability such as chatbots (63%)
  • Data-driven insights (60%)
  • Anomaly detection (59%)

While there is widespread enthusiasm for AI, the research identified three major gaps that organizations must overcome to realize the desired benefits and achieve business success. As with other industries, manufacturers must overcome the reality gap, the readiness gap, and the data gap in order to maximize the value of their AI investments.

Reality Gap: Manufacturers are confident about their AI adoption for IT services and digital experience, with 77% claiming to be ahead of their peers, including 25% who say they are significantly ahead. Only 7% say they are behind. This gap between perception and reality indicates many leaders are overconfident about where their IT function is on their AI journey in relation to their industry peers.

Readiness Gap: As stated earlier, there's a readiness gap as only 32% of manufacturing leaders say their organization is fully prepared to implement AI projects today. This group is behind all other sectors (except the public sector) in terms of AI preparation. Additionally, 67% say with AI still maturing, it's challenging to implement AI that works and scales.

Data Gap: Nearly all leaders in the manufacturing sector (87%) acknowledge that great data is critical for great AI. However, 69% are concerned about the effectiveness of their organization's data for AI usage, and only 42% rated their data as excellent for completeness and accuracy. It's notable too that 42% say their data quality is a barrier to further AI investment.

There are also growing concerns in the sector about data confidentiality and security risks, with 92% concerned that AI will access their organization's proprietary data in the public domain due to use of AI. The manufacturing industry is especially vulnerable to data breaches due to its widespread reliance on legacy systems, so cybersecurity is a concern for this sector.

Manufacturing organizations are implementing strategies to overcome AI challenges and achieve tangible results. To address AI preparedness, 57% of manufacturers have formed dedicated AI teams, and 42% observability and/or user experience teams.

Manufacturers are exploring other initiatives to drive successful AI integration. When it comes to data, the vast majority of manufacturing leaders (84%) say using real data, rather than synthetic data, is crucial in AI efforts to improve the digital experience.

Additionally, 83% of respondents agree that observability across all elements of IT is important in an AIOps strategy, and at least 81% say observability to overcome network blind spots—including public cloud, remote work environments, Zero Trust architectures, and enterprise-owned mobile devices—is either extremely or moderately important.

Methodology: The Riverbed Global AI & Digital Experience Survey polled 1,200 IT, business, and public sector decision-makers across seven countries, all with over $250 million in annual revenue (over $500 million in the US, UK, and France). Industries included manufacturing, financial services, retail, government/public sector, healthcare providers, energy and utilities, and transport and airlines. A total of 200 decision makers were surveyed in the Manufacturing industry. The survey was conducted by Coleman Parkes Research in June 2024.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Manufacturing Leaders Agree: AI Automation Is Important to Improve IT Efficiency and Deliver Improved Digital Experience

While there is high enthusiasm for AI — with 92% of those surveyed in the manufacturing industry confirming AI is a top C-Suite priority and 92% agree it provides a competitive advantage — only 32% of manufacturers are fully prepared to implement AI projects now, 5% lower than the overall industry average, according to Manufacturing sector results of the Riverbed Global AI & Digital Experience Survey.

Image
riverbed

Source: Kaizen

They recognize there are a number of challenges ranging from data quality to scalability which are impacting their ability to realize the full potential of AI technology. As AI continues to advance, manufacturers can achieve significant benefits including increased efficiency and productivity, improvements in product quality, optimizing inventory levels and production processes, and applying proactive data-driven decision making, all to collectively enhance and deliver a superior customer experience.

The next three years are anticipated to be a period of rapid expansion as enterprises seek practical AI approaches and solutions. By 2027, 83% of manufacturing leaders expect their organization to be fully prepared to implement their AI strategy and projects. During the same time period, AI is expected to mature and become a growth driver. Whereas today, 58% of leaders across manufacturing say the primary reason for using AI is to drive operational efficiencies over growth (42%), those numbers flip in 2027, with 65% of organizations saying AI will primarily be a growth driver versus driving efficiencies (35%). This sizable shift is one of the largest across all the industry sectors participating in the study.

Manufacturing leaders surveyed also said they expect to see many benefits through the use of AIOps, as 89% of manufacturers agree that AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver a superior digital experience for end users. Manufacturing leaders were asked to rank how they expect to use AI in their IT operations to improve Digital Employee Experience (DEX) within the next three years and the results revealed:

  • Workflow automation (80%)
  • Automated remediation (69%)
  • 24/7 support availability such as chatbots (63%)
  • Data-driven insights (60%)
  • Anomaly detection (59%)

While there is widespread enthusiasm for AI, the research identified three major gaps that organizations must overcome to realize the desired benefits and achieve business success. As with other industries, manufacturers must overcome the reality gap, the readiness gap, and the data gap in order to maximize the value of their AI investments.

Reality Gap: Manufacturers are confident about their AI adoption for IT services and digital experience, with 77% claiming to be ahead of their peers, including 25% who say they are significantly ahead. Only 7% say they are behind. This gap between perception and reality indicates many leaders are overconfident about where their IT function is on their AI journey in relation to their industry peers.

Readiness Gap: As stated earlier, there's a readiness gap as only 32% of manufacturing leaders say their organization is fully prepared to implement AI projects today. This group is behind all other sectors (except the public sector) in terms of AI preparation. Additionally, 67% say with AI still maturing, it's challenging to implement AI that works and scales.

Data Gap: Nearly all leaders in the manufacturing sector (87%) acknowledge that great data is critical for great AI. However, 69% are concerned about the effectiveness of their organization's data for AI usage, and only 42% rated their data as excellent for completeness and accuracy. It's notable too that 42% say their data quality is a barrier to further AI investment.

There are also growing concerns in the sector about data confidentiality and security risks, with 92% concerned that AI will access their organization's proprietary data in the public domain due to use of AI. The manufacturing industry is especially vulnerable to data breaches due to its widespread reliance on legacy systems, so cybersecurity is a concern for this sector.

Manufacturing organizations are implementing strategies to overcome AI challenges and achieve tangible results. To address AI preparedness, 57% of manufacturers have formed dedicated AI teams, and 42% observability and/or user experience teams.

Manufacturers are exploring other initiatives to drive successful AI integration. When it comes to data, the vast majority of manufacturing leaders (84%) say using real data, rather than synthetic data, is crucial in AI efforts to improve the digital experience.

Additionally, 83% of respondents agree that observability across all elements of IT is important in an AIOps strategy, and at least 81% say observability to overcome network blind spots—including public cloud, remote work environments, Zero Trust architectures, and enterprise-owned mobile devices—is either extremely or moderately important.

Methodology: The Riverbed Global AI & Digital Experience Survey polled 1,200 IT, business, and public sector decision-makers across seven countries, all with over $250 million in annual revenue (over $500 million in the US, UK, and France). Industries included manufacturing, financial services, retail, government/public sector, healthcare providers, energy and utilities, and transport and airlines. A total of 200 decision makers were surveyed in the Manufacturing industry. The survey was conducted by Coleman Parkes Research in June 2024.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ...