Skip to main content

Mitigating Complexity for Today's Database Administrator

Sean Sebring
SolarWinds

The data flowing through an IT system has never been more valuable to today's modern business or organization. The characteristics of that data — how clean it is, its accessibility, and its security — now have direct ties to major business initiatives, such as artificial intelligence (AI) implementation. As a result, the steward of each organization's databases, namely the database administrator (DBA), now plays a more important role than ever.

Despite their growing importance, SolarWinds data shows that one in three DBAs are contemplating leaving their positions — a striking indicator of workforce pressure in this role. This is likely due to the technical and interpersonal frustrations plaguing today's DBAs. Hybrid IT environments provide widespread organizational benefits but also present growing complexity. Simultaneously, AI presents a paradox of benefits and pain points. As organizations lean more on these database managers, it's imperative to mitigate some of the issues DBAs are facing.

The Expanding Universe of the Modern DBA

Before diving into solutions for today's DBAs, it's crucial to understand how much their role has evolved and how complex it has become. While the majority still manage Oracle and SQL servers (81% according to the study), DBAs are increasingly tasked with a sprawling mix of systems and functions, from in-memory and time-series databases to NoSQL, vector databases, orchestration platforms, data lakes, and analytics tools. On top of this, these responsibilities often stretch across multiple deployment environments — on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud — creating a tangled web of integration, visibility, and maintenance challenges.

Beyond this complexity, DBAs are trapped in a relentless cycle of firefighting that consumes most of their workweek. Reactive maintenance, constant alerts, and urgent issues dominate their time, with database managers spending an average of 27 out of 40 hours handling these crises. When over half their week is spent reacting, DBAs are left with little bandwidth for the forward-looking, strategic initiatives — such as capacity planning, database optimization, or experimenting with new tools and technologies — that could unlock real business growth.

DBAs and the AI Paradox

When it comes to AI, DBAs present something of a paradox. The technology is delivering real benefits: 62% of respondents report that AI helps them diagnose performance issues faster, and 60% say it ensures more reliable and consistent execution of routine tasks. However, AI is introducing new challenges into their workflows. DBAs face oversight gaps, misaligned AI processes, and difficulties stemming from poor-quality data.

The misalignment doesn't stop there. Executives often see AI's impact differently than DBAs. For instance, 43% of DBAs flagged AI-related security and compliance challenges, compared with only 31% of IT executives. Similarly, while 50% of DBAs say oversight and manual review are critical for AI success, only 43% of IT leaders agree. When executives and DBAs aren't aligned on how and where AI is implemented, frustration grows — and the promised return on investment (ROI) of AI tools can fall short.

Creating the Right Support System for DBAs

IT execs can begin to limit DBA frustration with three steps. First, they should tap into unified observability tooling that can remove some of the monitoring complexities DBAs face. An advanced observability platform will allow DBAs to view their servers and workflows through a single pane of glass, regardless of where they are deployed, creating a unified monitoring experience. This unified visibility will help reduce alert fatigue, streamline incident diagnosis, and mitigate some of the persistent firefighting that plagues DBAs daily.

Once firefighting is limited, IT execs and DBAs should partner on what strategic work could look like for the DBA. Think outside the box about cross-functional collaboration, architectural planning, and the testing of new technologies. This will allow the DBA to participate in rewarding work that breaks through the confines of daily tasks and contributes to business growth. Finally, it's important for DBAs and IT execs to align on a plan for AI. Allocate time and budget for hands-on training and tie each AI tool deployment to a specific task with the proper oversight. This will optimize AI's role in database management while maximizing ROI from AI spend.

When organizations empower today's DBAs with the right support system — in both tooling and teamwork — they set the stage for database management that leads directly to more business success.

Sean Sebring is Solutions Engineering Manager at SolarWinds

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

Mitigating Complexity for Today's Database Administrator

Sean Sebring
SolarWinds

The data flowing through an IT system has never been more valuable to today's modern business or organization. The characteristics of that data — how clean it is, its accessibility, and its security — now have direct ties to major business initiatives, such as artificial intelligence (AI) implementation. As a result, the steward of each organization's databases, namely the database administrator (DBA), now plays a more important role than ever.

Despite their growing importance, SolarWinds data shows that one in three DBAs are contemplating leaving their positions — a striking indicator of workforce pressure in this role. This is likely due to the technical and interpersonal frustrations plaguing today's DBAs. Hybrid IT environments provide widespread organizational benefits but also present growing complexity. Simultaneously, AI presents a paradox of benefits and pain points. As organizations lean more on these database managers, it's imperative to mitigate some of the issues DBAs are facing.

The Expanding Universe of the Modern DBA

Before diving into solutions for today's DBAs, it's crucial to understand how much their role has evolved and how complex it has become. While the majority still manage Oracle and SQL servers (81% according to the study), DBAs are increasingly tasked with a sprawling mix of systems and functions, from in-memory and time-series databases to NoSQL, vector databases, orchestration platforms, data lakes, and analytics tools. On top of this, these responsibilities often stretch across multiple deployment environments — on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud — creating a tangled web of integration, visibility, and maintenance challenges.

Beyond this complexity, DBAs are trapped in a relentless cycle of firefighting that consumes most of their workweek. Reactive maintenance, constant alerts, and urgent issues dominate their time, with database managers spending an average of 27 out of 40 hours handling these crises. When over half their week is spent reacting, DBAs are left with little bandwidth for the forward-looking, strategic initiatives — such as capacity planning, database optimization, or experimenting with new tools and technologies — that could unlock real business growth.

DBAs and the AI Paradox

When it comes to AI, DBAs present something of a paradox. The technology is delivering real benefits: 62% of respondents report that AI helps them diagnose performance issues faster, and 60% say it ensures more reliable and consistent execution of routine tasks. However, AI is introducing new challenges into their workflows. DBAs face oversight gaps, misaligned AI processes, and difficulties stemming from poor-quality data.

The misalignment doesn't stop there. Executives often see AI's impact differently than DBAs. For instance, 43% of DBAs flagged AI-related security and compliance challenges, compared with only 31% of IT executives. Similarly, while 50% of DBAs say oversight and manual review are critical for AI success, only 43% of IT leaders agree. When executives and DBAs aren't aligned on how and where AI is implemented, frustration grows — and the promised return on investment (ROI) of AI tools can fall short.

Creating the Right Support System for DBAs

IT execs can begin to limit DBA frustration with three steps. First, they should tap into unified observability tooling that can remove some of the monitoring complexities DBAs face. An advanced observability platform will allow DBAs to view their servers and workflows through a single pane of glass, regardless of where they are deployed, creating a unified monitoring experience. This unified visibility will help reduce alert fatigue, streamline incident diagnosis, and mitigate some of the persistent firefighting that plagues DBAs daily.

Once firefighting is limited, IT execs and DBAs should partner on what strategic work could look like for the DBA. Think outside the box about cross-functional collaboration, architectural planning, and the testing of new technologies. This will allow the DBA to participate in rewarding work that breaks through the confines of daily tasks and contributes to business growth. Finally, it's important for DBAs and IT execs to align on a plan for AI. Allocate time and budget for hands-on training and tie each AI tool deployment to a specific task with the proper oversight. This will optimize AI's role in database management while maximizing ROI from AI spend.

When organizations empower today's DBAs with the right support system — in both tooling and teamwork — they set the stage for database management that leads directly to more business success.

Sean Sebring is Solutions Engineering Manager at SolarWinds

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...