Skip to main content

Payment System Failures Put Canadian Businesses at Financial and Reputational Risk

Payment disruption is placing growing pressure on Canadian businesses. An estimated $7.6 billion in retail and hospitality sales is at risk each year due to payment system failures. 

A new collaborative report by FreedomPay, Dynatrace and Retail Economics reveals Canadians will wait just six minutes during a service outage before abandoning a purchase. However, the average outage lasts 67 minutes, leaving businesses susceptible to significant financial losses and potential damage to consumer trust and loyalty.

Canada is particularly vulnerable to payment disruptions, with businesses reporting almost seven (6.8) outages per year, a higher frequency than peers in the US (5.7), UK (5.1), France (5.0) and Germany (4.0). Large Canadian businesses with more than $700M in annual turnover report more frequent payment disruptions than smaller operators, increasing their exposure to the financial impact of outages.

The research draws on two nationally representative surveys, covering 2,000 Canadian consumers and 200 retail and hospitality managers, and examine the frequency, duration and commercial impact of payment disruptions.

"Payment disruption is a direct hit to the consumer and to businesses, and the longer it lasts, the more impact snowballs with missed sales and compounding recovery costs," said Christopher Kronenthal, President at FreedomPay. "Canadian businesses must adopt strategies to avoid and withstand disruption, including layered backup solutions and holistic payment ecosystems."

With customer trust and authenticity more important than ever, payment system outages also expose businesses to cascading vulnerabilities, potentially impacting long-term performance.

The report also examines how consumers behave when payment systems fail. It finds that almost two-thirds (63%) of "High-Risk Critics" (affluent, frequent shoppers) and more than one-third (38%) of "Silent Walkouts" (those who abandon without complaint) say a single payment failure reduces their trust in a business. This directly impacts long-term customer loyalty and return visits. The reputational risk can extend further online, with more than half (60%) of Gen Z saying they would likely share a negative experience on social media.

"When payments fail, customers don't just lose time, they lose confidence. A truly integrated payment resilience strategy, capable of anticipating, absorbing and recovering from outages, is no longer an option. It's the critical investment businesses need to make now to protect their transactions and reputation," said David Jones, VP of NORAM Solution Engineering at Dynatrace.

The urgency for Canadian businesses to invest in robust payment resilience is underscored by data showing that restoring payment systems within the first five minutes can prevent over 90% of potential losses. This highlights the critical need for rapid recovery capabilities.

Despite these alarming risks, many Canadian businesses are far from ready. The report states that one in three retail and hospitality businesses (32%) operates without any secure digital payment backup. Among those with some safeguards, investments are fragmented with only 44% using secondary internet connections, 40% offering offline card processing, and 29% that provide mobile payment alternatives. This disjointed approach leaves companies highly vulnerable to financial and reputational fallout.

"To effectively combat these vulnerabilities, businesses need to adopt solutions such as secondary internet for network resilience, offline card processing, and mobile payment alternatives. An integrated approach including robust POS reliability and guaranteed power continuity will enable businesses to secure financial stability and customer trust," said Richard Lim, CEO at Retail Economics.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Payment System Failures Put Canadian Businesses at Financial and Reputational Risk

Payment disruption is placing growing pressure on Canadian businesses. An estimated $7.6 billion in retail and hospitality sales is at risk each year due to payment system failures. 

A new collaborative report by FreedomPay, Dynatrace and Retail Economics reveals Canadians will wait just six minutes during a service outage before abandoning a purchase. However, the average outage lasts 67 minutes, leaving businesses susceptible to significant financial losses and potential damage to consumer trust and loyalty.

Canada is particularly vulnerable to payment disruptions, with businesses reporting almost seven (6.8) outages per year, a higher frequency than peers in the US (5.7), UK (5.1), France (5.0) and Germany (4.0). Large Canadian businesses with more than $700M in annual turnover report more frequent payment disruptions than smaller operators, increasing their exposure to the financial impact of outages.

The research draws on two nationally representative surveys, covering 2,000 Canadian consumers and 200 retail and hospitality managers, and examine the frequency, duration and commercial impact of payment disruptions.

"Payment disruption is a direct hit to the consumer and to businesses, and the longer it lasts, the more impact snowballs with missed sales and compounding recovery costs," said Christopher Kronenthal, President at FreedomPay. "Canadian businesses must adopt strategies to avoid and withstand disruption, including layered backup solutions and holistic payment ecosystems."

With customer trust and authenticity more important than ever, payment system outages also expose businesses to cascading vulnerabilities, potentially impacting long-term performance.

The report also examines how consumers behave when payment systems fail. It finds that almost two-thirds (63%) of "High-Risk Critics" (affluent, frequent shoppers) and more than one-third (38%) of "Silent Walkouts" (those who abandon without complaint) say a single payment failure reduces their trust in a business. This directly impacts long-term customer loyalty and return visits. The reputational risk can extend further online, with more than half (60%) of Gen Z saying they would likely share a negative experience on social media.

"When payments fail, customers don't just lose time, they lose confidence. A truly integrated payment resilience strategy, capable of anticipating, absorbing and recovering from outages, is no longer an option. It's the critical investment businesses need to make now to protect their transactions and reputation," said David Jones, VP of NORAM Solution Engineering at Dynatrace.

The urgency for Canadian businesses to invest in robust payment resilience is underscored by data showing that restoring payment systems within the first five minutes can prevent over 90% of potential losses. This highlights the critical need for rapid recovery capabilities.

Despite these alarming risks, many Canadian businesses are far from ready. The report states that one in three retail and hospitality businesses (32%) operates without any secure digital payment backup. Among those with some safeguards, investments are fragmented with only 44% using secondary internet connections, 40% offering offline card processing, and 29% that provide mobile payment alternatives. This disjointed approach leaves companies highly vulnerable to financial and reputational fallout.

"To effectively combat these vulnerabilities, businesses need to adopt solutions such as secondary internet for network resilience, offline card processing, and mobile payment alternatives. An integrated approach including robust POS reliability and guaranteed power continuity will enable businesses to secure financial stability and customer trust," said Richard Lim, CEO at Retail Economics.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ...