Synthetic vs Real Application Monitoring: Why You Need Both
September 04, 2014

Denis Goodwin
SmartBear

Share this

In order to properly manage your applications and user experience you need to start with monitoring them. Application monitoring is evolving — from its beginnings of simply pinging a server to see if it is up, to new, more sophisticated techniques which monitor every detail of a user interaction. How do you decide what techniques to use, should you abandon old methods for new? What’s the difference between Synthetic monitoring and real application monitoring?

There are advantages and disadvantages to both and no need to pick just one. Let’s take a brief look at each technique and see why together they’re better.

There are two main techniques used to monitor applications.

Synthetic monitoring, also called directed monitoring, and Real monitoring, also called passive monitoring; with each method there can be variations in the specifics of performing the task.


What is Synthetic Monitoring?

Synthetic or directed monitoring is a method to monitor your applications by simulating users – directing the path taken through the application. This directed monitoring provides information as to the uptime and performance of your critical business transactions, and most common paths in the application.

The questions that synthetic monitoring answers include:

■ Is my site up?

■ How fast is my site?

■ Are transactions working?

■ If there is a slow down or failure where is it in the infrastructure?

■ Are my third party components operating correctly?

■ How is my overall performance?

■ Am I striking the correct balance of performance versus cost?

Synthetic monitoring does not definitively tell you what your actual users are actually experiencing. In practice that means that you can have all green lights in the data center but a user experience that is broken, slow, and impacting business. Some examples of problems that synthetic monitoring does not find include:

■ Problems with specific browsers or devices that are not included in the synthetic tests

■ Problems with a path other than the ones being tested

■ Geographical problems not specifically measured- the network between a particular location and your application server.

■ Specific individual actions taken by users such as choosing items to add to a cart, can cause problems and synthetic testing cannot cover every iteration.

■ Intermittent problems can be highly troublesome since synthetic tests may not experience the problem when they are run.

What is Real Monitoring?

Real or passive monitoring is a method to monitor your end user activity on your application. Also known as real-user measurement, real-user metrics, or end-user experience monitoring (EUM), this passive monitoring, relies on Web-monitoring services that continuously observe your system in action, tracking availability, functionality, and responsiveness.

So in contrast to synthetic monitoring, real monitoring is unscripted. Information is gathered as users use the application live so the information is only about what users are doing. When an alert is issued, then it is something that actual users experience.

Real monitoring answers these questions:

■ What are users actually doing on the site-traffic flow?

■ What is the performance of the pages, and which components are slowest?

■ Am I fulfilling SLAs?

■ Did my latest release affect the user experience?

■ How does the user experience tie back to other areas of the company such as support?

Real monitoring doesn’t tell you anything about system availability if there are no users on the system. It can’t tell you if there are any problems in the infrastructure along paths that users aren’t on.

The Power of Using Synthetic and Real Together

Where real monitoring techniques provide insight into how your user actually interacts with your website or application, synthetic monitoring provides a similar assessment of expected user experience along with the benefits of true availability monitoring, third-party impact, and consistent base lining capabilities.

Combining synthetic and real monitoring gives a complete view of the user experience along with high level root cause clues. Real monitoring can miss outages, page errors, and third-party problems; while synthetic is really only a proxy for real-user experience and can miss problems experienced by various user populations. In this case, the whole really is greater than the sum of the parts. Using synthetic and real monitoring together provides a complete view of the system, infrastructure and user experience. Using both techniques in tandem eliminates those inherent blind spots and can provide an organization with the best view of their users’ experience – both actual and potential.

As important as these technical advances are, they also support organizational change creating a climate where everyone is responsible for the user experience.

■ Visibility provides efficiencies

■ Eliminates finger pointing

■ Reduces MTTR

■ Understanding impact on actual users allows for better business decisions

■ Brings business owners into the discussion

A unified system combining both synthetic and real monitoring not only facilitates these organizational changes but if it is implemented well, it provides much greater ease of use, with only one system to learn and data combined and displayed in a common manner.

This blog is an excerpt from a new interactive eBook from SmartBear, The Definitive Guide to Synthetic Vs Real Application Monitoring.

Denis Goodwin is Director of Product Management, APM, AlertSite UXM, SmartBear Software.

Share this

The Latest

January 16, 2018

Looking back on this year, we can see threads of what the future holds in enterprise networking. Specifically, taking a closer look at the biggest news and trends of this year, IT areas where businesses are investing and perspectives from the analyst community, as well as our own experiences, here are five network predictions for the coming year ...

January 12, 2018

As we enter 2018, businesses are busy anticipating what the new year will bring in terms of industry developments, growing trends, and hidden surprises. In 2017, the increased use of automation within testing teams (where Agile development boosted speed of release), led to QA becoming much more embedded within development teams than would have been the case a few years ago. As a result, proper software testing and monitoring assumes ever greater importance. The natural question is – what next? Here are some of the changes we believe will happen within our industry in 2018 ...

January 11, 2018

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) has become a must-have technology for IT organizations. In today’s era of digital transformation, distributed computing and cloud-native services, APM tools enable IT organizations to measure the real experience of users, trace business transactions to identify slowdowns and deliver the code-level visibility needed for optimizing the performance of applications. 2018 will see the requirements and expectations from APM solutions increase in the following ways ...

January 10, 2018

We don't often enough look back at the prior year’s predictions to see if they actually came to fruition. That is the purpose of this analysis. I have picked out a few key areas in APMdigest's 2017 Application Performance Management Predictions, and analyzed which predictions actually came true ...

January 09, 2018

Planning for a new year often includes predicting what’s going to happen. However, we don't often enough look back at the prior year’s predictions to see if they actually came to fruition. That is the purpose of this analysis. I have picked out a few key areas in APMdigest's 2017 Application Performance Management Predictions, and analyzed which predictions actually came true ...

January 08, 2018

The annual list of DevOps Predictions is now a DEVOPSdigest tradition. DevOps experts — analysts and consultants, users and the top vendors — offer predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2018 ...

January 05, 2018

Industry experts offer predictions on how Network Performance Management (NPM) and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2018 ...

January 04, 2018

Industry experts offer predictions on how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2018. Part 6 covers ITOA and data ...

January 03, 2018

Industry experts offer predictions on how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2018. Part 5 covers NoOps, Analytics, Machine Learning and AI ...

December 21, 2017

Industry experts offer predictions on how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2018. Part 4 covers the end user experience ...