In order to properly manage your applications and user experience you need to start with monitoring them. Application monitoring is evolving — from its beginnings of simply pinging a server to see if it is up, to new, more sophisticated techniques which monitor every detail of a user interaction. How do you decide what techniques to use, should you abandon old methods for new? What’s the difference between Synthetic monitoring and real application monitoring?
There are advantages and disadvantages to both and no need to pick just one. Let’s take a brief look at each technique and see why together they’re better.
There are two main techniques used to monitor applications.
Synthetic monitoring, also called directed monitoring, and Real monitoring, also called passive monitoring; with each method there can be variations in the specifics of performing the task.
What is Synthetic Monitoring?
Synthetic or directed monitoring is a method to monitor your applications by simulating users – directing the path taken through the application. This directed monitoring provides information as to the uptime and performance of your critical business transactions, and most common paths in the application.
The questions that synthetic monitoring answers include:
■ Is my site up?
■ How fast is my site?
■ Are transactions working?
■ If there is a slow down or failure where is it in the infrastructure?
■ Are my third party components operating correctly?
■ How is my overall performance?
■ Am I striking the correct balance of performance versus cost?
Synthetic monitoring does not definitively tell you what your actual users are actually experiencing. In practice that means that you can have all green lights in the data center but a user experience that is broken, slow, and impacting business. Some examples of problems that synthetic monitoring does not find include:
■ Problems with specific browsers or devices that are not included in the synthetic tests
■ Problems with a path other than the ones being tested
■ Geographical problems not specifically measured- the network between a particular location and your application server.
■ Specific individual actions taken by users such as choosing items to add to a cart, can cause problems and synthetic testing cannot cover every iteration.
■ Intermittent problems can be highly troublesome since synthetic tests may not experience the problem when they are run.
What is Real Monitoring?
Real or passive monitoring is a method to monitor your end user activity on your application. Also known as real-user measurement, real-user metrics, or end-user experience monitoring (EUM), this passive monitoring, relies on Web-monitoring services that continuously observe your system in action, tracking availability, functionality, and responsiveness.
So in contrast to synthetic monitoring, real monitoring is unscripted. Information is gathered as users use the application live so the information is only about what users are doing. When an alert is issued, then it is something that actual users experience.
Real monitoring answers these questions:
■ What are users actually doing on the site-traffic flow?
■ What is the performance of the pages, and which components are slowest?
■ Am I fulfilling SLAs?
■ Did my latest release affect the user experience?
■ How does the user experience tie back to other areas of the company such as support?
Real monitoring doesn’t tell you anything about system availability if there are no users on the system. It can’t tell you if there are any problems in the infrastructure along paths that users aren’t on.
The Power of Using Synthetic and Real Together
Where real monitoring techniques provide insight into how your user actually interacts with your website or application, synthetic monitoring provides a similar assessment of expected user experience along with the benefits of true availability monitoring, third-party impact, and consistent base lining capabilities.
Combining synthetic and real monitoring gives a complete view of the user experience along with high level root cause clues. Real monitoring can miss outages, page errors, and third-party problems; while synthetic is really only a proxy for real-user experience and can miss problems experienced by various user populations. In this case, the whole really is greater than the sum of the parts. Using synthetic and real monitoring together provides a complete view of the system, infrastructure and user experience. Using both techniques in tandem eliminates those inherent blind spots and can provide an organization with the best view of their users’ experience – both actual and potential.
As important as these technical advances are, they also support organizational change creating a climate where everyone is responsible for the user experience.
■ Visibility provides efficiencies
■ Eliminates finger pointing
■ Reduces MTTR
■ Understanding impact on actual users allows for better business decisions
■ Brings business owners into the discussion
A unified system combining both synthetic and real monitoring not only facilitates these organizational changes but if it is implemented well, it provides much greater ease of use, with only one system to learn and data combined and displayed in a common manner.
This blog is an excerpt from a new interactive eBook from SmartBear, The Definitive Guide to Synthetic Vs Real Application Monitoring.
Denis Goodwin is Director of Product Management, APM, AlertSite UXM, SmartBear Software.
The State of the Mainframe report from Syncsort revealed an increased focus on traditional data infrastructure optimization to control costs and help fund strategic organizational projects like AI, machine learning and predictive analytics in addition to widespread concern about meeting security and compliance requirements ...
The 2018 Software Fail Watch report from Tricentis investigated 606 failures that affected over 3.6 billion people and caused $1.7 trillion in lost revenue ...
Gartner predicts there will be nearly 21 billion connected “things” in use worldwide by 2020 – impressive numbers that should catch the attention of every CIO. IT leaders in nearly every vertical market will soon be inundated with the management of both the data from these devices as well as the management of the devices themselves, each of which require the same lifecycle management as any other IT equipment. This can be an overwhelming realization for CIOs who don’t have an adequate configuration management strategy for their current IT environments, the foundation upon which all future digital strategies – Internet-connected or otherwise – will be built ...
Many network operations teams question if they need to TAP their networks; perhaps they aren't familiar with test access points (TAPs), or they think there isn't an application that makes sense for them. Over the past decade, industry best-practice revealed that all network infrastructure should utilize a network TAP as the foundation for complete visibility. The following are the seven most popular applications for TAPs ...
Organizations are eager to adopt cloud based architectures in an effort to support their digital transformation efforts, drive efficiencies and strengthen customer satisfaction, according to a new online cloud usage survey conducted by Denodo ...
Globally, cloud data center traffic will represent 95 percent of total data center traffic by 2021, compared to 88 percent in 2016, according to the Cisco Global Cloud Index (2016-2021) ...
Enterprise cloud spending will grow rapidly over the next year, and yet 35 percent of cloud spend is wasted, according to The RightScale 2018 State of the Cloud Survey ...
What often goes overlooked in our always-on digital culture are the people at the other end of each of these services tasked with their 24/7 management. If something goes wrong, users are quick to complain or switch to a competitor as IT practitioners on the backend race to rectify the situation. A recent PagerDuty State of IT Work-Life Balance Report revealed that IT professionals are struggling with the pressures associated with the management of these digital offerings ...
Businesses everywhere continually strive for greater efficiency. By way of illustration, more than a third of IT professionals cite "moving faster" as their top goal for 2018, and improving the efficiency of operations was one of the top three stated business objectives for organizations considering digital transformation initiatives ...
One of the current challenges for IT teams is the movement of the network to the cloud, and the lack of visibility that comes with that shift. While there has been a lot of hype around the benefits of cloud computing, very little is being said about the inherent drawbacks ...