Skip to main content

The State of the Network 2015

The challenges - and solutions - in emerging technologies
Brad Reinboldt

Speedier network pipes that carry more information faster than ever before can be a windfall for enterprises looking to derive more business value from their underlying infrastructure. But there's a nefarious lining in there – when things speed up, they can get harder to manage.

Packets carrying crucial application information and content whizzing by in a blur can pose real visibility challenges IT pros haven't encountered before. Network and application performance management is undergoing sweeping changes thanks to not only faster networks but also migration to the cloud. And the implication for application and performance management are huge.

For the Network Instruments State of the Network Global Study 2015, we recently surveyed more than 300 CIOs, IT directors and network engineers, to get their take on how the migration to higher capacity and faster networks has affected their day-to-day duties monitoring application performance. What we found is that even though it seems like 10 Gb only just went mainstream, the insatiable demand for fatter pipes to push more content rich services is already outstripping its ability to deliver. Nearly 1 in 4 organizations already having deployed 25 or 40 Gb with upwards of 40% planning to do so in 2015.

More interesting was the fact that 60 percent had no plans to consider these speeds. We interpret this as a clear indicator that 25 and 40 Gb are likely at best short-term solutions to addressing the ever-increasing demands of more bandwidth with 100 Gb being the end-game (until at least 400 Gb arrives!). Results certainly suggest this, with 44 percent planning to deploy 100 Gb by 2016.

Network teams are in a bind: Do they get by with their existing 10 Gb infrastructure, maximizing their current investments while waiting for 100 Gb price points to become more cost effective? If not, are 25 or 40 Gb a viable option that will serve as a stop-gap solution? It's a difficult choice that each organization will need to consider carefully as they develop their network requirements for the next 5 to 10 years. It's amazing to think that 10 Gb, having only reached market dominance in the data center core in the past few years will likely be completely displaced in the largest, most demanding core environments in the next 2 to 3 years.

Of course, there are other technologies that are simultaneously maturing which must also be assessed in parallel. Ongoing cloud growth is now clearly a given, with nearly 75 percent expecting to deploy private and more than half public by 2016. This will certainly complicate the process of quantifying network bandwidth (along with latency) needs to ensure services continue to satisfy users' expectations wherever they may reside.

Likewise, the abstraction of all things related to IT infrastructure continues, with software-defined networking (SDN) rollouts expected to reach 50 percent by 2016. This too is an impressive number and speaks to the urgency of organizations as they drive to simplify network management, enable more scalability, improve agility, and reduce dependency on a single vendor.


Gigantic Implications for Performance Management

All these trends have gigantic implications for performance management. How will the tools needed to validate service delivery keep up with the deluge of packets? Since packets don't lie, having at least the option of analyzing and capturing all the traffic traversing the network means vendors' performance management solutions will need to continue offering their customers high-speed capture and long-term storage of this critical data.

From a cloud perspective, how will effective application visibility be maintained when hosting is done outside the confines of the traditional data center? Network teams are seeking ways of achieving this goal. Server virtualization - now nearly a given with nearly 90 percent of respondents stating plans to do so by 2016 - was yesterday's abstraction challenge. SDN will throw down a new gauntlet to maintaining monitoring visibility as the network is virtualized. Again, those responsible for network and infrastructure performance need assistance here.

So What Can Be Done? Below are several best practices for navigating this new landscape.

■ New ways of analyzing (including multivariate analytics and correlation), displaying, and reporting on infrastructure, network, and service health will need to be developed. Innovative instrumentation methods that can be deployed remotely and/or in ways that can be accomplished wherever services are currently deployed must be made available.

■ Maintaining visibility in SDN environments at the control and data planes will need to be addressed. Underlying infrastructure concerns don't go away with virtualization and in fact grow as increasing loads of placed on supporting hardware—monitoring solutions must provide this as well.

■ Automating this activity as much as possible will enable faster troubleshooting while concepts like RESTful APIs will enable tighter cross-platform solution integration and facilitate IT functional collaboration. These initiatives will ease the burden on network teams, shorten time-to-resolution, and ensure optimal service delivery. Just in time too, since the SOTN findings also show the same groups responsible for these duties must also spend increasing amounts of time addressing security threats. Almost 70% of network teams are already spending up to 10 hours per week, with another 26% greater than this amount.

These are exciting but challenging times for IT performance management. Emerging technologies offer great promise for enhanced future service delivery capabilities. Likewise, the threats are considerable; maintaining operational visibility so problems are quickly resolved, achieving optimal service performance, and increasing the ability to integrate across IT functional groups and solutions.

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

The State of the Network 2015

The challenges - and solutions - in emerging technologies
Brad Reinboldt

Speedier network pipes that carry more information faster than ever before can be a windfall for enterprises looking to derive more business value from their underlying infrastructure. But there's a nefarious lining in there – when things speed up, they can get harder to manage.

Packets carrying crucial application information and content whizzing by in a blur can pose real visibility challenges IT pros haven't encountered before. Network and application performance management is undergoing sweeping changes thanks to not only faster networks but also migration to the cloud. And the implication for application and performance management are huge.

For the Network Instruments State of the Network Global Study 2015, we recently surveyed more than 300 CIOs, IT directors and network engineers, to get their take on how the migration to higher capacity and faster networks has affected their day-to-day duties monitoring application performance. What we found is that even though it seems like 10 Gb only just went mainstream, the insatiable demand for fatter pipes to push more content rich services is already outstripping its ability to deliver. Nearly 1 in 4 organizations already having deployed 25 or 40 Gb with upwards of 40% planning to do so in 2015.

More interesting was the fact that 60 percent had no plans to consider these speeds. We interpret this as a clear indicator that 25 and 40 Gb are likely at best short-term solutions to addressing the ever-increasing demands of more bandwidth with 100 Gb being the end-game (until at least 400 Gb arrives!). Results certainly suggest this, with 44 percent planning to deploy 100 Gb by 2016.

Network teams are in a bind: Do they get by with their existing 10 Gb infrastructure, maximizing their current investments while waiting for 100 Gb price points to become more cost effective? If not, are 25 or 40 Gb a viable option that will serve as a stop-gap solution? It's a difficult choice that each organization will need to consider carefully as they develop their network requirements for the next 5 to 10 years. It's amazing to think that 10 Gb, having only reached market dominance in the data center core in the past few years will likely be completely displaced in the largest, most demanding core environments in the next 2 to 3 years.

Of course, there are other technologies that are simultaneously maturing which must also be assessed in parallel. Ongoing cloud growth is now clearly a given, with nearly 75 percent expecting to deploy private and more than half public by 2016. This will certainly complicate the process of quantifying network bandwidth (along with latency) needs to ensure services continue to satisfy users' expectations wherever they may reside.

Likewise, the abstraction of all things related to IT infrastructure continues, with software-defined networking (SDN) rollouts expected to reach 50 percent by 2016. This too is an impressive number and speaks to the urgency of organizations as they drive to simplify network management, enable more scalability, improve agility, and reduce dependency on a single vendor.


Gigantic Implications for Performance Management

All these trends have gigantic implications for performance management. How will the tools needed to validate service delivery keep up with the deluge of packets? Since packets don't lie, having at least the option of analyzing and capturing all the traffic traversing the network means vendors' performance management solutions will need to continue offering their customers high-speed capture and long-term storage of this critical data.

From a cloud perspective, how will effective application visibility be maintained when hosting is done outside the confines of the traditional data center? Network teams are seeking ways of achieving this goal. Server virtualization - now nearly a given with nearly 90 percent of respondents stating plans to do so by 2016 - was yesterday's abstraction challenge. SDN will throw down a new gauntlet to maintaining monitoring visibility as the network is virtualized. Again, those responsible for network and infrastructure performance need assistance here.

So What Can Be Done? Below are several best practices for navigating this new landscape.

■ New ways of analyzing (including multivariate analytics and correlation), displaying, and reporting on infrastructure, network, and service health will need to be developed. Innovative instrumentation methods that can be deployed remotely and/or in ways that can be accomplished wherever services are currently deployed must be made available.

■ Maintaining visibility in SDN environments at the control and data planes will need to be addressed. Underlying infrastructure concerns don't go away with virtualization and in fact grow as increasing loads of placed on supporting hardware—monitoring solutions must provide this as well.

■ Automating this activity as much as possible will enable faster troubleshooting while concepts like RESTful APIs will enable tighter cross-platform solution integration and facilitate IT functional collaboration. These initiatives will ease the burden on network teams, shorten time-to-resolution, and ensure optimal service delivery. Just in time too, since the SOTN findings also show the same groups responsible for these duties must also spend increasing amounts of time addressing security threats. Almost 70% of network teams are already spending up to 10 hours per week, with another 26% greater than this amount.

These are exciting but challenging times for IT performance management. Emerging technologies offer great promise for enhanced future service delivery capabilities. Likewise, the threats are considerable; maintaining operational visibility so problems are quickly resolved, achieving optimal service performance, and increasing the ability to integrate across IT functional groups and solutions.

Hot Topics

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...