Skip to main content

Unrelenting IT Issues Cost Millions of Hours in Lost Productivity

Poor DEX directly costs global businesses an average of 470,000 hours per year, equivalent to around 226 full-time employees, according to a new report from Nexthink, Cracking the DEX Equation: The Annual Workplace Productivity Report. This indicates that digital friction is a vital and underreported element of the global productivity crisis.

The report finds that the average employee suffers 14 negative digital experiences a week. These include device crashes, application glitches, or slow load times, and can reduce productivity and collaboration while also increasing employee frustration and stress. Crucially, the research also indicates a strong inverse correlation between an organization's DEX score and productivity loss. For every 10-point increase to the overall DEX score, employees would recoup an average of 22 productive minutes each week.

"Quantifying the immense cumulative impact of bad DEX is truly eye-opening," commented Pedro Bados, CEO and Co-Founder of Nexthink. "Employees who constantly have frustrating digital experiences suffer eight times the productivity loss compared to those who have consistently good experiences. All told, enterprises are losing millions of hours every year because of malfunctioning technology. This is unacceptable, yet it's regarded by many as just another cost of doing business."

The research also suggests that these consistent disruptions are not just a threat to enterprise productivity, but also to the quality of work employees produce. The average negative event lasts a little under 3 minutes (167 seconds), yet research from the American Psychological Association suggests that even delays of less than 5 seconds are enough to triple people's error rate. Moreover, research from the University of California has shown that if when employees are taken out of their flow state it takes around 23 minutes for them to return, further increasing the amount of lost time.

Averaging lost time by industry shows significant variation with retailers, healthcare providers, and financial service companies suffering 1.7x the time loss of the tech industry. The number of disruptive events per week was almost identical, regardless of industry however, suggesting that the variance in time loss is down to the severity of events rather than the volume.

"Even small digital disruptions can cascade into hours of lost productivity," added Bados. "But often these incidents are much bigger with employees losing whole days as a result. This isn't just about overall enterprise productivity, it's also about digital friction pushing people to boiling point because they feel stuck and abandoned — a feeling that is being turbo-charged in the AI era. If IT departments don't address these fundamental issues, the business will lose talented people to competitors, become less collaborative, and fall behind in the innovation race, all of which will inevitably have serious implications for their bottom line."

Methodology: Nexthink's analysis is based on proprietary data from more than 20m endpoints across 474 global businesses. The figures in this report are derived from aggregated, anonymized telemetry from organizations largely in the early stages of DEX management.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

Unrelenting IT Issues Cost Millions of Hours in Lost Productivity

Poor DEX directly costs global businesses an average of 470,000 hours per year, equivalent to around 226 full-time employees, according to a new report from Nexthink, Cracking the DEX Equation: The Annual Workplace Productivity Report. This indicates that digital friction is a vital and underreported element of the global productivity crisis.

The report finds that the average employee suffers 14 negative digital experiences a week. These include device crashes, application glitches, or slow load times, and can reduce productivity and collaboration while also increasing employee frustration and stress. Crucially, the research also indicates a strong inverse correlation between an organization's DEX score and productivity loss. For every 10-point increase to the overall DEX score, employees would recoup an average of 22 productive minutes each week.

"Quantifying the immense cumulative impact of bad DEX is truly eye-opening," commented Pedro Bados, CEO and Co-Founder of Nexthink. "Employees who constantly have frustrating digital experiences suffer eight times the productivity loss compared to those who have consistently good experiences. All told, enterprises are losing millions of hours every year because of malfunctioning technology. This is unacceptable, yet it's regarded by many as just another cost of doing business."

The research also suggests that these consistent disruptions are not just a threat to enterprise productivity, but also to the quality of work employees produce. The average negative event lasts a little under 3 minutes (167 seconds), yet research from the American Psychological Association suggests that even delays of less than 5 seconds are enough to triple people's error rate. Moreover, research from the University of California has shown that if when employees are taken out of their flow state it takes around 23 minutes for them to return, further increasing the amount of lost time.

Averaging lost time by industry shows significant variation with retailers, healthcare providers, and financial service companies suffering 1.7x the time loss of the tech industry. The number of disruptive events per week was almost identical, regardless of industry however, suggesting that the variance in time loss is down to the severity of events rather than the volume.

"Even small digital disruptions can cascade into hours of lost productivity," added Bados. "But often these incidents are much bigger with employees losing whole days as a result. This isn't just about overall enterprise productivity, it's also about digital friction pushing people to boiling point because they feel stuck and abandoned — a feeling that is being turbo-charged in the AI era. If IT departments don't address these fundamental issues, the business will lose talented people to competitors, become less collaborative, and fall behind in the innovation race, all of which will inevitably have serious implications for their bottom line."

Methodology: Nexthink's analysis is based on proprietary data from more than 20m endpoints across 474 global businesses. The figures in this report are derived from aggregated, anonymized telemetry from organizations largely in the early stages of DEX management.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...