Acceldata announced AI Observability, a solution that brings observability for LLM and agentic AI applications to Acceldata’s xLake Data & AI Platform.
Acceldata governs and traces AI across a hybrid estate, on-premises and across clouds, without first requiring the data to be consolidated in one place. That reach does two things at once. It makes agents safe to put into production, and it lets enterprises build agents against data they could never centralize.
AI Observability traces every prompt, model call, tool invocation and retrieval step, continuously evaluating outputs to ensure they are correct, reliable and aligned with user intent. This adds to the data quality, lineage and pipeline monitoring the platform already provides.
AI Observability gives teams one view spanning data health and AI behavior, wherever the data lives, rather than a separate tool for each layer. While tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard, governing them wherever the data lives is not.
“The top blocker to enterprise AI is fear of ungoverned agents and data. Acceldata removes it with the introduction of AI Observability to the xLake Data & AI Platform,” said Rohit Choudhary, Acceldata founder and CEO. “Now you can govern and trace AI wherever your data lives, on-premises or across clouds, which lets you build agents against data you could never centralize. Governance becomes the reason you can do more with your data, not less.”
Acceldata’s approach to AI Observability:
First, Acceldata governs and traces an agent wherever the data lives, across a hybrid estate of on-premises and cloud, so organizations can trust the agents they run and build new agents with confidence.
“Tracing and evaluating agents is becoming standard; what matters is what a failure connects to,” said Ashwin Rajeeva, Acceldata co-founder and CTO. “We connect it to data quality, pipeline health, lineage, and compute across a hybrid estate, on-premises and cloud, on the platform teams already run for data observability.”
Second, an agent failure and the data behind it sit in one console. On the same platform that monitors data quality, lineage and pipelines, a team can follow a failing trace back to the data product or pipeline that produced it, instead of stopping at the model or the application layer. Existing solutions for observing agents each stop at a different boundary: the application and infrastructure layer, the cloud data warehouse or the model. Unlike tools anchored to a single cloud warehouse or the application layer, Acceldata reaches across the hybrid estate that spans public cloud and on-premises.
Acceldata's AI Observability brings the agent-behavior view to a platform already built on data observability and runtime governance.
The solution helps address issues customers face, including hallucinations, debugging without visibility, data quality issues, inflated token costs and other problems.
AI Observability includes several additional features that help mitigate the governance issues plaguing organizations, including:
- Full execution tracing. Every conversation resolves into a thread, trace and span structure across prompts, model calls, tool calls, retrieval and agent steps, so teams can debug a single run step by step.
- Traceback to the data source. AI Observability shares one console with the platform's data quality, lineage and pipeline views, so a failure seen in a trace can be followed to the data product or pipeline that produced it.
- Continuous evaluation. Online evaluation scores production traffic, and offline evaluation runs regression and model comparison on curated datasets, using LLM-as-judge, heuristic and custom metrics such as hallucination, answer relevance and context precision. It alerts IT when quality, latency, cost or reliability crosses a threshold.
- Feedback and dataset flywheel. With datasets treated as first-class objects, teams annotate traces with human feedback and promote production traces, including failures, into evaluation sets.
- Cost and performance visibility. Token usage, cost, latency and error trends by project, model and application version.
- Governance and runtime safety. Sensitive data and PII detection, configurable data masking, policy checks captured in the trace, audit of AI usage and multi-tenant isolation.
- Broad framework coverage. Integrations across LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, AutoGen, ADK, OpenAI and Anthropic, plus SDK instrumentation for custom applications.
Acceldata AI Observability software is delivered as a native capability of the Acceldata platform rather than a standalone point product. Teams instrument applications through the SDK and framework integrations.
The Latest
Performance bottlenecks aren't uncommon when it comes to rolling out new technology, regardless of how capable or game-changing that technology might be. Every generation of new tech has encountered roadblocks that had to be overcome before it was truly able to shine. Virtualization forced organizations to rethink resource allocation, cloud transformation had us shift our focus toward scalability and elasticity, and microservices introduced entirely new challenges around observability and distributed systems. There's something different about AI, however ...
Consider a single order represented across order-management, execution, and settlement systems. Each database, message broker, and application may be online and processing its own records correctly. Yet the workflow has failed if related events arrive on different clocks, rely on inconsistent state, or cannot be reconciled before an operational decision must be made ...
AI now exists in almost every IT workflow. In a recent survey of more than 800 IT service professionals, all respondents indicated the use of AI in some form within their organization. But there's a growing paradox: if dashboards are clearing faster and alerts are resolved at unprecedented speed, why aren't IT service desks reporting lighter workloads? The research found that 71% of IT teams said their actual workload has remained flat or increased since adopting AI. This reality appears to contradict what we’ve been told about AI ...
Two years ago, almost every customer conversation about AI started with the same questions: Which model should we use? What can it do? Is it ready for the enterprise? Today, those discussions have moved on. CIOs are far more interested in how to govern AI, integrate it with existing systems, prepare their workforce and make it part of everyday operations. The challenge is no longer to prove that AI can deliver value. It's instead about how to embed AI into the business in a way that's secure, scalable and delivers measurable outcomes ...
Two things happened to production incidents between 2023 and now, and they did not happen at the same speed. The first is that a class of dependency that barely existed three years ago now accounts for one incident in ten. Incidents disclosed by AI model and AI application providers rose from 1.7% of all disclosed unplanned incidents in 2023 to 10.7% in 2026 year to date, roughly a sixfold rise; that counts only incidents at AI companies themselves, so the true share is higher. The second is that the time to close an incident has not come down ...
When an AI assistant gives an incomplete or incorrect answer, teams often blame the model. They adjust prompts, switch models, increase context windows or test a new retrieval strategy. However the model may not be a problem. In many enterprise AI workflows, the problem begins inside the document-ingestion pipeline ...
If you talk to any security or observability teams right now, they're all fighting the same fire: their tooling was built to ingest X, but their sources are pumping Y and soon to be doing Z. The knee-jerk reaction is always the same: we need more platform. However, this reaction is wrong. Let me explain why, because the solution to this problem is foundational, not financial. Instead of hurling yet more money at the problem, make sure you've done what's needed upstream ...
Rapid AI adoption and the unique ways AI workloads operate is redefining the scope and structure of what these teams must deliver. This shift is forcing organizations to rethink how they manage scale, automation, and control, according to The State of SRE and Platform Engineering 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...
AI is usually talked about as a software tool, but it also depends heavily on the network behind it. Whether a company is using AI for chatbots, automation, monitoring, analytics, or employee support, all of that information has to move across the network in a reliable and secure way. That means AI is not just an application decision. It is also an infrastructure decision. Before organizations rush into AI, they should ask a simple question: Is our network ready to support it? ...
Enterprise AI often lacks governed access to where business processes actually execute. Without that access, AI agents may be able to reason, but they cannot operate reliably across enterprise workflows. For AI agents to effectively carry out workflows, they will require integration-layer context and controls. Organizations can implement these prerequisites by providing AI with managed access to the middleware layer ...