Skip to main content

AgenticOps Scaling Quickly in the Enterprise

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco.

More than four of every five respondents expect to reach an AI-led operating model within 12 months, with more than three-quarters willing to grant agentic AI significant autonomy in NetOps, including nearly a quarter that are comfortable with fully autonomous operation and no human oversight.

The findings indicate that organizations have moved from AI in an advisory role to AgenticOps for agent-powered network operations in which operators set direction and guardrails while AI agents sense, reason, and act across domains. It comes as NetOps teams face rising performance expectations and increasingly dynamic environments, with AI workloads adding new traffic patterns, performance requirements, and operational complexity.

"Agentic AI represents a fundamental paradigm shift: moving from running operations to orchestrating intent," said Joe Vaccaro, SVP/GM, Network Platform & Assurance at Cisco. "Agentic AI for NetOps requires trust built on visibility into every decision, explainable context behind every recommendation, and guardrails that ensure deterministic outcomes. Organizations that master this balance will keep operators firmly in command while enabling agentic systems that act with confidence, validate outcomes, and continuously prove operational trust."

The findings show that agent-driven AI has taken on operational responsibility in NetOps. This shift is occurring as the average organization generates about 4,100 monitoring alerts and events each day; more than half of them are network related. At this volume, manually clearing the daily network-alert backlog would require roughly 100 IT specialists. Organizations also report that nearly half of network alerts are closed without investigation, and an almost identical number of respondents report investigation time is spent pursuing false positives. As adoption advances, requirements for built-in trust are shaping how organizations implement and scale AI.

Operational complexity is placing pressure on traditional NetOps models

Organizations report managing high alert volumes, continuous change, fragmented tooling, and issues that span multiple domains. Against this backdrop, a vast majority (95%) say their existing, non-agentic AIOps tools fall short in one or more significant areas.

  • 92% report that performance issues commonly span multiple domains, requiring correlation across ten or more tools for resolution.
  • 57% say their current change processes can't match the speed required today.

AI adoption creates new demands on the network

That operational complexity is compounded as AI adoption grows and agents operate at software speed, generating unpredictable traffic patterns and greater data exchange.

  • AI traffic is on a trajectory to double every six months, according to a Cisco analysis of aggregated direct-to-AI network telemetry.
  • When traffic generated by agentic AI is included, Cisco testing found that tasks performed by agents can generate up to 450% more total network traffic.

Organizations are turning to an agent-driven network

Many organizations are allowing AI agents to take on more responsibility in NetOps, including making production changes such as rerouting traffic, adjusting wireless parameters, isolating suspicious endpoints, and resolving incidents end to end without prior human approval.

  • 75% have already deployed AI for NetOps.
  • 51% run agentic AI that acts  in production today.
  • 80% are comfortable granting AI a high or fully autonomous role in NetOps, including 24% who are comfortable with AI acting with no human oversight.
  • 82% are comfortable allowing AI to make at least some production network changes without prior human approval.
  • 84% expect an AI-led operating model within twelve months.

Organizations will scale agentic AI on the condition of visibility and trust

Organizations are open to greater agent-driven operations in NetOps, but their willingness to scale it depends on transparency, visibility, and controls.

  • 86% say a single integrated platform is the most effective path forward.
  • 69% require detailed explainability for agent-driven actions.
  • 36% say full observability, including detailed tracing, summarized rationale, and post-action audits, is the minimum acceptable standard.

"The striking takeaway is not simply that AI adoption in NetOps is growing, but how quickly organizations are preparing for AI-led operations," said Jim Frey, Chief Analyst, Network and IT Operations, from Omdia. "The findings point to a broader shift from the advisory model of AIOps to agent-powered operations, AgenticOps, that can take action. As that shift accelerates, integrated visibility, strong governance, and measurable outcomes will be critical to expanding autonomy while maintaining operational control."

Methodology: The report is based on data from an independent global survey of 1,000 IT and network operations leaders, conducted by Omdia. Survey respondents were decision-makers at organizations with 500 or more employees across North America, Western Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

The Latest

For decades, traditional observability tools have forced IT professionals to sift through endless dashboards, turning a flood of alerts into actionable insight and driving widespread burnout. While enterprises adopted AI to eliminate this friction, most still deploy it reactively rather than proactively ... As systems become more complex and IT moves to the center of business strategy, a reactive posture is unsustainable ...

Ask an operations team what they monitor and you will hear a familiar list: latency, errors, throughput, uptime. Those signals still matter for AI, but they no longer answer the most important question. As Krishna Sai, CTO of SolarWinds, puts it: "Traditional observability tells you a system is running. AI observability tells you whether it's still reasoning soundly. Those are completely different questions" ...

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

AgenticOps Scaling Quickly in the Enterprise

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco.

More than four of every five respondents expect to reach an AI-led operating model within 12 months, with more than three-quarters willing to grant agentic AI significant autonomy in NetOps, including nearly a quarter that are comfortable with fully autonomous operation and no human oversight.

The findings indicate that organizations have moved from AI in an advisory role to AgenticOps for agent-powered network operations in which operators set direction and guardrails while AI agents sense, reason, and act across domains. It comes as NetOps teams face rising performance expectations and increasingly dynamic environments, with AI workloads adding new traffic patterns, performance requirements, and operational complexity.

"Agentic AI represents a fundamental paradigm shift: moving from running operations to orchestrating intent," said Joe Vaccaro, SVP/GM, Network Platform & Assurance at Cisco. "Agentic AI for NetOps requires trust built on visibility into every decision, explainable context behind every recommendation, and guardrails that ensure deterministic outcomes. Organizations that master this balance will keep operators firmly in command while enabling agentic systems that act with confidence, validate outcomes, and continuously prove operational trust."

The findings show that agent-driven AI has taken on operational responsibility in NetOps. This shift is occurring as the average organization generates about 4,100 monitoring alerts and events each day; more than half of them are network related. At this volume, manually clearing the daily network-alert backlog would require roughly 100 IT specialists. Organizations also report that nearly half of network alerts are closed without investigation, and an almost identical number of respondents report investigation time is spent pursuing false positives. As adoption advances, requirements for built-in trust are shaping how organizations implement and scale AI.

Operational complexity is placing pressure on traditional NetOps models

Organizations report managing high alert volumes, continuous change, fragmented tooling, and issues that span multiple domains. Against this backdrop, a vast majority (95%) say their existing, non-agentic AIOps tools fall short in one or more significant areas.

  • 92% report that performance issues commonly span multiple domains, requiring correlation across ten or more tools for resolution.
  • 57% say their current change processes can't match the speed required today.

AI adoption creates new demands on the network

That operational complexity is compounded as AI adoption grows and agents operate at software speed, generating unpredictable traffic patterns and greater data exchange.

  • AI traffic is on a trajectory to double every six months, according to a Cisco analysis of aggregated direct-to-AI network telemetry.
  • When traffic generated by agentic AI is included, Cisco testing found that tasks performed by agents can generate up to 450% more total network traffic.

Organizations are turning to an agent-driven network

Many organizations are allowing AI agents to take on more responsibility in NetOps, including making production changes such as rerouting traffic, adjusting wireless parameters, isolating suspicious endpoints, and resolving incidents end to end without prior human approval.

  • 75% have already deployed AI for NetOps.
  • 51% run agentic AI that acts  in production today.
  • 80% are comfortable granting AI a high or fully autonomous role in NetOps, including 24% who are comfortable with AI acting with no human oversight.
  • 82% are comfortable allowing AI to make at least some production network changes without prior human approval.
  • 84% expect an AI-led operating model within twelve months.

Organizations will scale agentic AI on the condition of visibility and trust

Organizations are open to greater agent-driven operations in NetOps, but their willingness to scale it depends on transparency, visibility, and controls.

  • 86% say a single integrated platform is the most effective path forward.
  • 69% require detailed explainability for agent-driven actions.
  • 36% say full observability, including detailed tracing, summarized rationale, and post-action audits, is the minimum acceptable standard.

"The striking takeaway is not simply that AI adoption in NetOps is growing, but how quickly organizations are preparing for AI-led operations," said Jim Frey, Chief Analyst, Network and IT Operations, from Omdia. "The findings point to a broader shift from the advisory model of AIOps to agent-powered operations, AgenticOps, that can take action. As that shift accelerates, integrated visibility, strong governance, and measurable outcomes will be critical to expanding autonomy while maintaining operational control."

Methodology: The report is based on data from an independent global survey of 1,000 IT and network operations leaders, conducted by Omdia. Survey respondents were decision-makers at organizations with 500 or more employees across North America, Western Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

The Latest

For decades, traditional observability tools have forced IT professionals to sift through endless dashboards, turning a flood of alerts into actionable insight and driving widespread burnout. While enterprises adopted AI to eliminate this friction, most still deploy it reactively rather than proactively ... As systems become more complex and IT moves to the center of business strategy, a reactive posture is unsustainable ...

Ask an operations team what they monitor and you will hear a familiar list: latency, errors, throughput, uptime. Those signals still matter for AI, but they no longer answer the most important question. As Krishna Sai, CTO of SolarWinds, puts it: "Traditional observability tells you a system is running. AI observability tells you whether it's still reasoning soundly. Those are completely different questions" ...

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...