Sentry announced the beta of AI code review, an AI-powered solution that identifies and fixes critical code issues before they reach production.
Following its strategic acquisitions of Codecov (2022) and Emerge Tools (2025), AI code review marks a significant step in Sentry’s expansion into the pre-release phase of software development.
Like Sentry’s AI debugging agent Seer, AI code review leverages the power of modern artificial intelligence — with all the context and insights that only Sentry has — to predict errors, review pull requests (PRs) for accuracy, and even auto-generate unit tests, all before shipping code to production.
“AI code review gives developers the edge to stop errors before they ever reach production,” said Milin Desai, CEO of Sentry. “AI has already reshaped how software is built, and with Seer we proved it could revolutionize debugging by root causing issues with over 94% accuracy and delivering context-aware fixes in seconds. Now Sentry users can benefit from that intelligence earlier in the build cycle, powered by Sentry’s deep context and code insights, so teams can ship cleaner code with speed and confidence.”
AI code review is designed to bring speed, accuracy, and confidence to software development. Instead of catching errors only after code is deployed, developers can now prevent them from ever reaching production.
Key capabilities include:
- Error Prediction: Automatically flags high-confidence, high-impact issues in pull requests, showing developers where and why a bug will occur and suggesting actionable fixes.
- Smart PR Review: Detects typos, formatting errors, and logical mistakes so human reviewers can focus on architecture and design decisions.
- Test Generation: Uses AI to generate unit tests for code in a pull request, accelerating test coverage without draining developer time.
“The only thing easier than debugging errors with Sentry is having fewer errors to debug in the first place,” said Rohan Bhaumik, Senior Product Manager at Sentry. “By combining predictive error detection with automated testing, AI code review dramatically reduces wasted time in code reviews, strengthens test coverage, and lets teams merge with confidence.”
Historically, Sentry has been known as the platform developers rely on once code hits production. AI code review reflects the company’s expansion upstream into the pre-release process, offering an end-to-end solution that ensures software stability before and after launch.
Sentry’s expansion upstream began with the acquisition of Codecov, which gave the Sentry platform powerful code coverage insights and capabilities, and accelerated with the recent acquisition of Emerge Tools and their advanced mobile performance optimization suite. With AI code review, Sentry now connects observability and testing, all with AI-driven insights across the software development lifecycle.
Developers will love using AI code review, but CFOs and managers will love it too. For engineering leaders and decision-makers, the benefits of Sentry AI code review include:
- Reduced downtime risk: Catch high-impact bugs earlier, avoiding costly production incidents.
- Faster release velocity: Streamlined code reviews and automated testing accelerate delivery.
- Improved developer productivity: Developers spend less time chasing typos and more time building features.
As enterprises increasingly adopt AI developer tools, adding AI code review to its feature-set positions Sentry as a leading innovator bridging observability and prevention — ensuring organizations can meet user expectations while maintaining speed and reliability.
AI code review is now available in beta for GitHub users.
The Latest
For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...
Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...
Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...
Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...
AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...
More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 21, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AI-driven NetOps ...
Enterprise IT has become increasingly complex and fragmented. Organizations are juggling dozens — sometimes hundreds — of different tools for endpoint management, security, app delivery, and employee experience. Each one needs its own license, its own maintenance, and its own integration. The result is a patchwork of overlapping tools, data stuck in silos, security vulnerabilities, and IT teams are spending more time managing software than actually getting work done ...
2025 was the year everybody finally saw the cracks in the foundation. If you were running production workloads, you probably lived through at least one outage you could not explain to your executives without pulling up a diagram and a whiteboard ...