Skip to main content

SolarWinds Unlocks Real-Time Performance Visibility for SAP HANA Cloud

New Data Performance Analyzer (DPA) support brings wait-based analytics and AI-assisted tuning to SAP HANA Cloud, helping DBAs resolve issues faster and keep uptime high across every deployment

SolarWinds introduced Database Performance Analyzer (DPA) for SAP HANA® Cloud, giving database teams a single, real-time view into SAP HANA performance across cloud and hybrid deployments, so they can react faster, troubleshoot smarter, and keep uptime high. 

Available now in DPA 2026.2, DPA for SAP HANA Cloud brings SolarWinds® DPA's proven wait-based analytics, rich alerting, and AI-assisted tuning together with deep SAP HANA-aware monitoring, helping database administrators see exactly what an SAP HANA Cloud instance is waiting on before it becomes a business problem.

SAP HANA Cloud powers the most business-critical workloads in the enterprise, including ERP, finance, analytics, and operations, and when performance degrades, the impact is immediate and wide-reaching. Root-cause identification has historically been slow and expert-dependent, leaving database teams reacting to problems rather than preventing them — in fact, according to the 2025 State of Database Report, SolarWinds found surveyed DBAs spend more than half their workweek, an average of 27 hours, on reactive firefighting tasks, with only 40% saying their monitoring environment is fully unified. SolarWinds DPA for SAP HANA Cloud changes that by delivering deep, SAP HANA-aware observability, wait-based analytics, and AI-assisted tuning in a single platform, giving teams one consistent view of SAP HANA performance regardless of where it runs.

Key capabilities include:

  • Dedicated SAP HANA instance type in DPA, with full support for SAP HANA Cloud (QRC releases) and SAP HANA 2.0+ on-premises for hybrid deployments.
  • Coverage for both single-container and multi-container (MDC) deployments, eliminating visibility gaps across mixed environments.
  • Full DPA wait-based analytics and deep resource metrics, spanning Quick, Plan, SQL Text, Stats, Blocking, and Summarization dimensions.
  • Intelligent alerting across wait, resource, admin, blackout, and custom thresholds to catch issues before they escalate.
  • Incremental SAP HANA-specific cloud observability that deepens with each DPA release as the platform continues to evolve.

“As SAP HANA Cloud has become the foundation for the most demanding SAP workloads, the pressure on database teams to maintain consistent performance has never been higher," said Bharat Bedi, General Manager, Database Observability, SolarWinds. "The challenge isn't a lack of data; it's a lack of clarity. SolarWinds DPA for SAP HANA Cloud cuts through that with wait-based analytics, intelligent alerting, and AI-assisted tuning that puts optimization in reach for every DBA on the team."

The introduction of DPA for SAP HANA Cloud builds on a long-standing commitment at SolarWinds to give database administrators the depth of visibility and actionable insight needed to protect critical business infrastructure. The solution extends DPA's established database observability platform, already trusted across database provider industry leaders, into one of the most business-critical monitoring environments in the enterprise.

DPA for SAP HANA Cloud is now available in DPA 2026.2.

The Latest

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

SolarWinds Unlocks Real-Time Performance Visibility for SAP HANA Cloud

New Data Performance Analyzer (DPA) support brings wait-based analytics and AI-assisted tuning to SAP HANA Cloud, helping DBAs resolve issues faster and keep uptime high across every deployment

SolarWinds introduced Database Performance Analyzer (DPA) for SAP HANA® Cloud, giving database teams a single, real-time view into SAP HANA performance across cloud and hybrid deployments, so they can react faster, troubleshoot smarter, and keep uptime high. 

Available now in DPA 2026.2, DPA for SAP HANA Cloud brings SolarWinds® DPA's proven wait-based analytics, rich alerting, and AI-assisted tuning together with deep SAP HANA-aware monitoring, helping database administrators see exactly what an SAP HANA Cloud instance is waiting on before it becomes a business problem.

SAP HANA Cloud powers the most business-critical workloads in the enterprise, including ERP, finance, analytics, and operations, and when performance degrades, the impact is immediate and wide-reaching. Root-cause identification has historically been slow and expert-dependent, leaving database teams reacting to problems rather than preventing them — in fact, according to the 2025 State of Database Report, SolarWinds found surveyed DBAs spend more than half their workweek, an average of 27 hours, on reactive firefighting tasks, with only 40% saying their monitoring environment is fully unified. SolarWinds DPA for SAP HANA Cloud changes that by delivering deep, SAP HANA-aware observability, wait-based analytics, and AI-assisted tuning in a single platform, giving teams one consistent view of SAP HANA performance regardless of where it runs.

Key capabilities include:

  • Dedicated SAP HANA instance type in DPA, with full support for SAP HANA Cloud (QRC releases) and SAP HANA 2.0+ on-premises for hybrid deployments.
  • Coverage for both single-container and multi-container (MDC) deployments, eliminating visibility gaps across mixed environments.
  • Full DPA wait-based analytics and deep resource metrics, spanning Quick, Plan, SQL Text, Stats, Blocking, and Summarization dimensions.
  • Intelligent alerting across wait, resource, admin, blackout, and custom thresholds to catch issues before they escalate.
  • Incremental SAP HANA-specific cloud observability that deepens with each DPA release as the platform continues to evolve.

“As SAP HANA Cloud has become the foundation for the most demanding SAP workloads, the pressure on database teams to maintain consistent performance has never been higher," said Bharat Bedi, General Manager, Database Observability, SolarWinds. "The challenge isn't a lack of data; it's a lack of clarity. SolarWinds DPA for SAP HANA Cloud cuts through that with wait-based analytics, intelligent alerting, and AI-assisted tuning that puts optimization in reach for every DBA on the team."

The introduction of DPA for SAP HANA Cloud builds on a long-standing commitment at SolarWinds to give database administrators the depth of visibility and actionable insight needed to protect critical business infrastructure. The solution extends DPA's established database observability platform, already trusted across database provider industry leaders, into one of the most business-critical monitoring environments in the enterprise.

DPA for SAP HANA Cloud is now available in DPA 2026.2.

The Latest

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...