Skip to main content

For SysAdmins, Things Are Not as They Seem

Dirk Paessler

In Fall 2016, Paessler AG surveyed 650 system administrators from 49 countries to get a "state of the SysAdmin" and find out how their jobs are changing, how they spend their time, and what their priorities are. The survey responses led to some interesting findings – namely, that when it comes to today's SysAdmins, things are not as they seem. Here are some of the key findings that illustrate the gap between perception and reality.

Winds of Change

The survey results show us that the role of the SysAdmin is undergoing great change. In fact, 30 percent of respondents indicated that their career has changed completely in the past five years. Also, nearly half of the respondents, 48.6 percent, indicated that their job has undergone "some change" in a five-year period. Only 5.7 percent of respondents thought that their job was the same as it was five years ago. Looking at this high level of change, I wonder if the trend will continue and how different things will become for the SysAdmin over the next five years.

Time – Not as it Seems

Other results show us that there is a significant gap between how SysAdmins are spending their time and how they prefer to be spending their time. According to the responses, SysAdmins are spending the majority of their time on internal support, maintenance tasks, and ensuring office productivity. However, what they would prefer to be spending time on is a much different list, including implementing new hardware, evaluating new products and solutions, and focusing on cybersecurity and firewalls. Clearly, they are spending most of their time on tactical, reactive tasks while they would rather be spending more time on strategic, forward-looking projects.

Also, we asked what technology services they are using or are actively planning to implement. Among the top responses were virtualization, cloud, cybersecurity and network monitoring. And, while the following topics may be widely covered in the media, few of the respondents reported plans for projects with IoT, Big Data management or Software Defined Networking (SDN).

Describe Yourself

One thing that may reflect the changes in the time spent on their day-to-day job is their titles and how they describe themselves. Among the respondents, the majority identified themselves as generalists, while only 28.7 percent described themselves as IT specialists.

Certifications and Academic Background

The survey results showed that Microsoft certifications are most popular (45.6 percent of respondents) followed by Cisco (26.8 percent), VMware (17 percent) and CompTIA (13.8) percent. For education, 40.8 percent of those surveyed had an academic degree, compared with 35.6 percent with vocational training and 23.6 percent who learned on the job.

In all, the SysAdmin that we think we know today might actually be quite different than those walking the halls at our customers or in our own companies. In fact, one more figure could reflect a gap in perception – 39.7 percent of respondents indicated that they did not believe that IT vendors understood the challenges that they faced. Maybe as perception catches up with the reality of today's SysAdmins, vendor understanding will improve as well as an overall, industry-wide understanding of what being a SysAdmin is really like.

Dirk Paessler is CEO and Founder of Paessler AG.


Hot Topics

The Latest

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

For SysAdmins, Things Are Not as They Seem

Dirk Paessler

In Fall 2016, Paessler AG surveyed 650 system administrators from 49 countries to get a "state of the SysAdmin" and find out how their jobs are changing, how they spend their time, and what their priorities are. The survey responses led to some interesting findings – namely, that when it comes to today's SysAdmins, things are not as they seem. Here are some of the key findings that illustrate the gap between perception and reality.

Winds of Change

The survey results show us that the role of the SysAdmin is undergoing great change. In fact, 30 percent of respondents indicated that their career has changed completely in the past five years. Also, nearly half of the respondents, 48.6 percent, indicated that their job has undergone "some change" in a five-year period. Only 5.7 percent of respondents thought that their job was the same as it was five years ago. Looking at this high level of change, I wonder if the trend will continue and how different things will become for the SysAdmin over the next five years.

Time – Not as it Seems

Other results show us that there is a significant gap between how SysAdmins are spending their time and how they prefer to be spending their time. According to the responses, SysAdmins are spending the majority of their time on internal support, maintenance tasks, and ensuring office productivity. However, what they would prefer to be spending time on is a much different list, including implementing new hardware, evaluating new products and solutions, and focusing on cybersecurity and firewalls. Clearly, they are spending most of their time on tactical, reactive tasks while they would rather be spending more time on strategic, forward-looking projects.

Also, we asked what technology services they are using or are actively planning to implement. Among the top responses were virtualization, cloud, cybersecurity and network monitoring. And, while the following topics may be widely covered in the media, few of the respondents reported plans for projects with IoT, Big Data management or Software Defined Networking (SDN).

Describe Yourself

One thing that may reflect the changes in the time spent on their day-to-day job is their titles and how they describe themselves. Among the respondents, the majority identified themselves as generalists, while only 28.7 percent described themselves as IT specialists.

Certifications and Academic Background

The survey results showed that Microsoft certifications are most popular (45.6 percent of respondents) followed by Cisco (26.8 percent), VMware (17 percent) and CompTIA (13.8) percent. For education, 40.8 percent of those surveyed had an academic degree, compared with 35.6 percent with vocational training and 23.6 percent who learned on the job.

In all, the SysAdmin that we think we know today might actually be quite different than those walking the halls at our customers or in our own companies. In fact, one more figure could reflect a gap in perception – 39.7 percent of respondents indicated that they did not believe that IT vendors understood the challenges that they faced. Maybe as perception catches up with the reality of today's SysAdmins, vendor understanding will improve as well as an overall, industry-wide understanding of what being a SysAdmin is really like.

Dirk Paessler is CEO and Founder of Paessler AG.


Hot Topics

The Latest

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...