Skip to main content

Top 5 Service Performance Challenges in the Cloud

What do Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure, and Google Apps have in common? They’re all cloud computing services, of course. But they share something else in common — each of these clouds has experienced periods of outages and slowdowns, impacting businesses worldwide that increasingly rely on the cloud for critical operations. And while there’s a great deal of publicity when these prominent public clouds suffer outages, it’s no less damaging to the business when an IT department’s private cloud goes off-line, even if it doesn’t make the news. It’s no wonder that according to analyst firm IDC, two of the top three concerns that CIO’s have about cloud computing are performance and availability.

Moving services to the cloud promises to deliver increased agility at a lower cost − but there are many risks along the way and greater complexity to manage when you get there. The following are five critical hurdles that you may face when implementing and operating a private cloud or hybrid cloud and how you can overcome them.

1. Will it work? How can you tell which applications are suitable for cloud and plan a successful migration?

Not every application is suitable for the cloud. And sometimes one part of an application is cloud-ready while other components are not. You need to identify the most suitable applications and components for migration, identify potential problems such as chattiness and latency that are amplified in the cloud, and create a performance baseline that you can test against after migration. With a clear picture of service dependencies and infrastructure usage, you can create a checklist that will ensure a complete and successful migration.

2. Performance – If you don’t know which physical servers your application is running on, how do you find server-related root causes when performance issues arise?

In fully-dedicated environments, we sometimes use infrastructure metrics and events to diagnose performance issues. But inferring application performance from tier-based statistics becomes challenging – if not impossible – when applications share dynamically allocated physical resources. To manage application performance in the cloud, you need a real-time topological map of service delivery across all tiers. Since the landscape is always changing, it’s essential that the dependency map is dynamically generated and automatically updated for every single transaction and service instance.

3. Chargeback – How do you know how much CPU your application is consuming in order to choose an appropriate chargeback model or verify your bills?

IT needs a new paradigm for assessing resource consumption in order to transition from a resource-focused cost-center to a business-service-focused profit-center. But traditional chargeback and APM tools do not collect resource utilization per transaction to enable business-aligned costing and chargeback paradigms. For the cloud, you need a solution that monitors consumption for every service across multiple applications and tiers, so you can accurately cost services, decide on appropriate chargeback schemes, and tune applications and infrastructure for better resource utilization and lower cost.

4. Not aligned with the business – How do you ensure that services are allocated according to business priority?

Clouds offer us new levels of dynamic resource allocation. However, to ensure that SLAs in the cloud are met, you must be able to prioritize the allocation of resources based on measurements of real end-user performance and an accurate view of where additional resources can truly alleviate SLA risks. To make that possible, you need a clear picture of resource consumption at the transaction level and business intelligence about the impact of each infrastructure tier on performance. Provisioning based on business priorities becomes even more critical as cloud architectures transition to a dynamic auto-provisioning model.

5. Over-provisioning – How can you right-size capacity and prevent over-provisioning that undercuts ROI?

Sharing IT infrastructure can be more efficient and cost-effective – assuming you have an accurate picture of resource usage for each service, an understanding of how that allocation affects SLA compliance, and the ability to prioritize resource allocation. In the cloud, a complete history of all transaction instances, including precise resource utilization metrics and SLAs, is essential for making intelligent decisions about provisioning. And with an accurate picture of resource consumption for each business transaction, cloud owners can plan future capacity requirements accurately.

Russell Rothstein is Founder and CEO, IT Central Station.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Top 5 Service Performance Challenges in the Cloud

What do Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure, and Google Apps have in common? They’re all cloud computing services, of course. But they share something else in common — each of these clouds has experienced periods of outages and slowdowns, impacting businesses worldwide that increasingly rely on the cloud for critical operations. And while there’s a great deal of publicity when these prominent public clouds suffer outages, it’s no less damaging to the business when an IT department’s private cloud goes off-line, even if it doesn’t make the news. It’s no wonder that according to analyst firm IDC, two of the top three concerns that CIO’s have about cloud computing are performance and availability.

Moving services to the cloud promises to deliver increased agility at a lower cost − but there are many risks along the way and greater complexity to manage when you get there. The following are five critical hurdles that you may face when implementing and operating a private cloud or hybrid cloud and how you can overcome them.

1. Will it work? How can you tell which applications are suitable for cloud and plan a successful migration?

Not every application is suitable for the cloud. And sometimes one part of an application is cloud-ready while other components are not. You need to identify the most suitable applications and components for migration, identify potential problems such as chattiness and latency that are amplified in the cloud, and create a performance baseline that you can test against after migration. With a clear picture of service dependencies and infrastructure usage, you can create a checklist that will ensure a complete and successful migration.

2. Performance – If you don’t know which physical servers your application is running on, how do you find server-related root causes when performance issues arise?

In fully-dedicated environments, we sometimes use infrastructure metrics and events to diagnose performance issues. But inferring application performance from tier-based statistics becomes challenging – if not impossible – when applications share dynamically allocated physical resources. To manage application performance in the cloud, you need a real-time topological map of service delivery across all tiers. Since the landscape is always changing, it’s essential that the dependency map is dynamically generated and automatically updated for every single transaction and service instance.

3. Chargeback – How do you know how much CPU your application is consuming in order to choose an appropriate chargeback model or verify your bills?

IT needs a new paradigm for assessing resource consumption in order to transition from a resource-focused cost-center to a business-service-focused profit-center. But traditional chargeback and APM tools do not collect resource utilization per transaction to enable business-aligned costing and chargeback paradigms. For the cloud, you need a solution that monitors consumption for every service across multiple applications and tiers, so you can accurately cost services, decide on appropriate chargeback schemes, and tune applications and infrastructure for better resource utilization and lower cost.

4. Not aligned with the business – How do you ensure that services are allocated according to business priority?

Clouds offer us new levels of dynamic resource allocation. However, to ensure that SLAs in the cloud are met, you must be able to prioritize the allocation of resources based on measurements of real end-user performance and an accurate view of where additional resources can truly alleviate SLA risks. To make that possible, you need a clear picture of resource consumption at the transaction level and business intelligence about the impact of each infrastructure tier on performance. Provisioning based on business priorities becomes even more critical as cloud architectures transition to a dynamic auto-provisioning model.

5. Over-provisioning – How can you right-size capacity and prevent over-provisioning that undercuts ROI?

Sharing IT infrastructure can be more efficient and cost-effective – assuming you have an accurate picture of resource usage for each service, an understanding of how that allocation affects SLA compliance, and the ability to prioritize resource allocation. In the cloud, a complete history of all transaction instances, including precise resource utilization metrics and SLAs, is essential for making intelligent decisions about provisioning. And with an accurate picture of resource consumption for each business transaction, cloud owners can plan future capacity requirements accurately.

Russell Rothstein is Founder and CEO, IT Central Station.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.