Skip to main content

Lack of Visibility into IT Software Can Be Costly

Tim Flower

IT leaders have a tremendous influence on how their organization functions, setting the tone for how their teams respond to digital transformation and approach strategic challenges. Though economists are warning of a multi-year recession, Gartner predicts that IT spending will increase in 2023. As a result, IT decision makers are feeling the pressure to invest wisely when it comes to software applications, while also finding savings to offset some of the rising costs. However, research shows IT leaders don't understand how their employees are using company-issued tools.

The result? Expenses are higher than necessary, there is poor employee technology adoption — and the related risk of either under or over provisioning — and there is a lack of productivity associated with inconsistent configurations.


What Aren't IT Pros Seeing and What Is it Costing Them?

A recent study revealed only an alarming 5% of IT decision makers who report having complete visibility into employee adoption and usage of company-issued applications, demonstrating they are often unknowingly careless when it comes to software investments that can ultimately be costly in terms of time and resources.

On average, employees use between 11 and 50 software applications per day, with IT leaders unclear how many are actively in use, for how long, or how frequently, or how many seats (licenses) are available/used for each application.

Software licenses can easily eat large portions of an IT budget unnecessarily by teams unknowingly subscribing to overlapping or unnecessary applications, in addition to employees retaining licenses from a prior role, or using applications they are not licenced to have, all which multiply spending. The fix, in theory, is simple: Organizations can avoid overspending by creating visibility into application usage, consolidating like-for-like software, and prioritizing applications that already share similar data and don't require hard labor to create integrations. In actuality, IT leaders are in the dark about the specific applications being used and how, meaning efficient consolidation is difficult or impossible.

Think of it this way: if an organizations' subscription licenses add up to $500 in total per device across 20,000 employees, reducing unneeded license counts by a conservative 5% and consolidating like-for-like titles for an additional 5% improvement could provide $1M in cost reductions that could be booked as savings or reallocated to other more strategic initiatives.

The True Cost of Poor Visibility: Employee Productivity

For technology adoption to be successful IT needs the full support of management and the individual department heads where it is being deployed. If organizations had full visibility into how employees are using the technology at their disposal, they might uncover that their teams don't have a full grasp on how to even use the tools properly which costs time and resources to address and resolve resulting issues.

Over 70% of IT pros reported it takes their teams between 6 to 24 hours to fully resolve a single employee issue, whether it's a desktop or web application problem

For example, over 70% of IT pros reported it takes their teams between 6 to 24 hours to fully resolve a single employee issue, whether it's a desktop or web application problem. That time spent is a combination of technical issues coupled with usability and employee education and it keeps employees from doing their work and IT teams from focusing on larger issues.

More often than not, one application error is part of a larger network or device problem that exhibits itself across the application's user base that inhibits productivity long-term over a large number of people. Approaching these problems as widespread technology issues rather than individual incidents that impact one employee at a time, and looking at it from the perspective of the employees (all of them) can help IT team's see a bigger picture and get to the root of issues faster and for more people all at once.

So, What Now?

IT pros are in a difficult position amid a looming recession which calls for efficient IT investment from the C-suite, yet data shows many aren't even clear on what tools they already have in place and what capabilities they are missing. With top level executives paying closer attention to overall digital transformation that is necessary for long-term success, it's crucial that IT leaders know how their organizations use their software and applications, and how that usage can be better managed for improved financial management in the future.

There are several ways to achieve this: implementing employee surveys, technical education for employees on their tools, and monitoring services to better see the full utilization picture. The onus, then, is on IT leaders to understand how to use this information for full organizational efficiency and cost savings.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

Lack of Visibility into IT Software Can Be Costly

Tim Flower

IT leaders have a tremendous influence on how their organization functions, setting the tone for how their teams respond to digital transformation and approach strategic challenges. Though economists are warning of a multi-year recession, Gartner predicts that IT spending will increase in 2023. As a result, IT decision makers are feeling the pressure to invest wisely when it comes to software applications, while also finding savings to offset some of the rising costs. However, research shows IT leaders don't understand how their employees are using company-issued tools.

The result? Expenses are higher than necessary, there is poor employee technology adoption — and the related risk of either under or over provisioning — and there is a lack of productivity associated with inconsistent configurations.


What Aren't IT Pros Seeing and What Is it Costing Them?

A recent study revealed only an alarming 5% of IT decision makers who report having complete visibility into employee adoption and usage of company-issued applications, demonstrating they are often unknowingly careless when it comes to software investments that can ultimately be costly in terms of time and resources.

On average, employees use between 11 and 50 software applications per day, with IT leaders unclear how many are actively in use, for how long, or how frequently, or how many seats (licenses) are available/used for each application.

Software licenses can easily eat large portions of an IT budget unnecessarily by teams unknowingly subscribing to overlapping or unnecessary applications, in addition to employees retaining licenses from a prior role, or using applications they are not licenced to have, all which multiply spending. The fix, in theory, is simple: Organizations can avoid overspending by creating visibility into application usage, consolidating like-for-like software, and prioritizing applications that already share similar data and don't require hard labor to create integrations. In actuality, IT leaders are in the dark about the specific applications being used and how, meaning efficient consolidation is difficult or impossible.

Think of it this way: if an organizations' subscription licenses add up to $500 in total per device across 20,000 employees, reducing unneeded license counts by a conservative 5% and consolidating like-for-like titles for an additional 5% improvement could provide $1M in cost reductions that could be booked as savings or reallocated to other more strategic initiatives.

The True Cost of Poor Visibility: Employee Productivity

For technology adoption to be successful IT needs the full support of management and the individual department heads where it is being deployed. If organizations had full visibility into how employees are using the technology at their disposal, they might uncover that their teams don't have a full grasp on how to even use the tools properly which costs time and resources to address and resolve resulting issues.

Over 70% of IT pros reported it takes their teams between 6 to 24 hours to fully resolve a single employee issue, whether it's a desktop or web application problem

For example, over 70% of IT pros reported it takes their teams between 6 to 24 hours to fully resolve a single employee issue, whether it's a desktop or web application problem. That time spent is a combination of technical issues coupled with usability and employee education and it keeps employees from doing their work and IT teams from focusing on larger issues.

More often than not, one application error is part of a larger network or device problem that exhibits itself across the application's user base that inhibits productivity long-term over a large number of people. Approaching these problems as widespread technology issues rather than individual incidents that impact one employee at a time, and looking at it from the perspective of the employees (all of them) can help IT team's see a bigger picture and get to the root of issues faster and for more people all at once.

So, What Now?

IT pros are in a difficult position amid a looming recession which calls for efficient IT investment from the C-suite, yet data shows many aren't even clear on what tools they already have in place and what capabilities they are missing. With top level executives paying closer attention to overall digital transformation that is necessary for long-term success, it's crucial that IT leaders know how their organizations use their software and applications, and how that usage can be better managed for improved financial management in the future.

There are several ways to achieve this: implementing employee surveys, technical education for employees on their tools, and monitoring services to better see the full utilization picture. The onus, then, is on IT leaders to understand how to use this information for full organizational efficiency and cost savings.

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...