Skip to main content

Streamlining Anomaly Detection and Remediation with Edge Observability

Ozan Unlu
Edge Delta

Over the past several years, architectures have become increasingly distributed and datasets have grown at unprecedented rates. Despite these shifts, the tools available to detect issues within your most critical applications and services have remained stuck in a centralized model. In this centralized model, teams must collect, ingest, and index datasets before asking questions upon them to derive any value.

This approach worked well five years ago for most use cases, and now, it still suffices for batching, common information models, correlation, threat feeds, and more. However, when it comes to real-time analytics at large scale — specifically anomaly detection and resolution — there are inherent limitations. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for DevOps and SRE teams to minimize the impact of issues and ensure high-quality end-user experiences.

In this blog, I'm going to propose a new approach to support real-time use cases — edge observability — that enables you to detect issues as they occur and resolve them in minutes. But first, let' s walk through the current centralized model and the limitations it imposes on DevOps and SRE teams.

Centralized Observability Limits Visibility, Proactive Alerting, and Performance

The challenges created by centralized observability are largely a byproduct of exponential data growth. Shipping, ingesting, and indexing terabytes or even petabytes of data each day is difficult and cost-prohibitive for many businesses. So, teams are forced to predict which datasets meet the criteria to be centralized. The rest is banished to a cold storage destination, where you cannot apply real-time analytics on top of the dataset. For DevOps and SRE teams, this means less visibility and creates the potential that an issue could be present in a non-indexed dataset — meaning the team is unable to detect it.

On top of that, engineers must manually define monitoring logic within their observability platforms to uncover issues in real-time. This is not only time-consuming but puts the onus on the engineer to know every pattern they' d like to alert on upfront. This approach is reactive in nature since teams are often looking for behaviors they' re aware of or have seen before.

Root causing an issue and writing an effective unit test for it has been around for ages, but what happens when you need to detect and resolve an issue that' s never occurred before?

Lastly, the whole process is slow and begs the question, "how fast is real-time?"

Engineers must collect, compress, encrypt, and transfer data to a centralized cloud or data center. Then, they must unpack, ingest, index, and query the data before they can dashboard and alert. These steps naturally create a delta between when an issue actually occurs and when it's alerted upon. This delta grows as volumes increase and query performance degrades.

What is Edge Observability?

To detect issues in real-time and repair them in minutes, teams need to complement traditional observability with distributed stream processing and machine learning. Edge observability uses these technologies to push intelligence upstream to the data source. In other words, it calls for starting the analysis on raw telemetry within an organization' s computing environment before routing to downstream platforms.

By starting to analyze your telemetry data at the source, you no longer need to choose which datasets to centralize and which to neglect. Instead, you can process data as it' s created unlocking complete visibility into every dataset — and in turn, every issue.

Machine learning complements this approach by automatically:

■ baselining the datasets

■ detecting changes in behavior

■ determining the likelihood of an anomaly or issue

■ triggering an alert in real-time

Because these operations are all running at the source, alerts are triggered orders of magnitude faster than is possible with the old centralized approach.

It' s critical to point out that the use of machine learning wipes out the need for engineers to build and maintain complex monitoring logic within an observability platform. Instead, the machine learning picks up on negative patterns — even unknown unknowns — and surfaces the full context of the issue (including the raw data associated with it) to streamline root-cause analysis. Though operationalizing machine learning for real-time insights into high volumes has always proved a challenge at scale, distributing this machine learning gives teams the ability to have full access and deep views into all data sets.

Edge Observability Cuts MTTR from Hours to Minutes

Taking this approach, teams can detect anomalous changes in system behavior as soon as they occur and then pinpoint the affected systems/components in a few clicks — all without requiring an engineer to build regex, define parse statements, or run manual queries.

Organizations of all sizes and backgrounds are seeing the value of edge observability. Some are using it to dramatically reduce debugging times while others are gaining visibility into issues they didn' t know were going on. In all situations, it' s clear that analyzing massive volumes of data in real-time calls for a new approach — and this will only become clearer as data continues to grow exponentially. This new approach starts at the edge.

Ozan Unlu is CEO of Edge Delta

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...

Streamlining Anomaly Detection and Remediation with Edge Observability

Ozan Unlu
Edge Delta

Over the past several years, architectures have become increasingly distributed and datasets have grown at unprecedented rates. Despite these shifts, the tools available to detect issues within your most critical applications and services have remained stuck in a centralized model. In this centralized model, teams must collect, ingest, and index datasets before asking questions upon them to derive any value.

This approach worked well five years ago for most use cases, and now, it still suffices for batching, common information models, correlation, threat feeds, and more. However, when it comes to real-time analytics at large scale — specifically anomaly detection and resolution — there are inherent limitations. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for DevOps and SRE teams to minimize the impact of issues and ensure high-quality end-user experiences.

In this blog, I'm going to propose a new approach to support real-time use cases — edge observability — that enables you to detect issues as they occur and resolve them in minutes. But first, let' s walk through the current centralized model and the limitations it imposes on DevOps and SRE teams.

Centralized Observability Limits Visibility, Proactive Alerting, and Performance

The challenges created by centralized observability are largely a byproduct of exponential data growth. Shipping, ingesting, and indexing terabytes or even petabytes of data each day is difficult and cost-prohibitive for many businesses. So, teams are forced to predict which datasets meet the criteria to be centralized. The rest is banished to a cold storage destination, where you cannot apply real-time analytics on top of the dataset. For DevOps and SRE teams, this means less visibility and creates the potential that an issue could be present in a non-indexed dataset — meaning the team is unable to detect it.

On top of that, engineers must manually define monitoring logic within their observability platforms to uncover issues in real-time. This is not only time-consuming but puts the onus on the engineer to know every pattern they' d like to alert on upfront. This approach is reactive in nature since teams are often looking for behaviors they' re aware of or have seen before.

Root causing an issue and writing an effective unit test for it has been around for ages, but what happens when you need to detect and resolve an issue that' s never occurred before?

Lastly, the whole process is slow and begs the question, "how fast is real-time?"

Engineers must collect, compress, encrypt, and transfer data to a centralized cloud or data center. Then, they must unpack, ingest, index, and query the data before they can dashboard and alert. These steps naturally create a delta between when an issue actually occurs and when it's alerted upon. This delta grows as volumes increase and query performance degrades.

What is Edge Observability?

To detect issues in real-time and repair them in minutes, teams need to complement traditional observability with distributed stream processing and machine learning. Edge observability uses these technologies to push intelligence upstream to the data source. In other words, it calls for starting the analysis on raw telemetry within an organization' s computing environment before routing to downstream platforms.

By starting to analyze your telemetry data at the source, you no longer need to choose which datasets to centralize and which to neglect. Instead, you can process data as it' s created unlocking complete visibility into every dataset — and in turn, every issue.

Machine learning complements this approach by automatically:

■ baselining the datasets

■ detecting changes in behavior

■ determining the likelihood of an anomaly or issue

■ triggering an alert in real-time

Because these operations are all running at the source, alerts are triggered orders of magnitude faster than is possible with the old centralized approach.

It' s critical to point out that the use of machine learning wipes out the need for engineers to build and maintain complex monitoring logic within an observability platform. Instead, the machine learning picks up on negative patterns — even unknown unknowns — and surfaces the full context of the issue (including the raw data associated with it) to streamline root-cause analysis. Though operationalizing machine learning for real-time insights into high volumes has always proved a challenge at scale, distributing this machine learning gives teams the ability to have full access and deep views into all data sets.

Edge Observability Cuts MTTR from Hours to Minutes

Taking this approach, teams can detect anomalous changes in system behavior as soon as they occur and then pinpoint the affected systems/components in a few clicks — all without requiring an engineer to build regex, define parse statements, or run manual queries.

Organizations of all sizes and backgrounds are seeing the value of edge observability. Some are using it to dramatically reduce debugging times while others are gaining visibility into issues they didn' t know were going on. In all situations, it' s clear that analyzing massive volumes of data in real-time calls for a new approach — and this will only become clearer as data continues to grow exponentially. This new approach starts at the edge.

Ozan Unlu is CEO of Edge Delta

The Latest

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

Enterprise IT environments have never been more observable ... Yet many organizations still grapple with outages, lengthy incident resolution cycles, and increasing complexity. Most teams do not suffer from a shortage of data. They struggle to determine what deserves attention and what action to take next ... Enterprise IT operations must move beyond monitoring and visibility. The next stage of maturity is decision operations, an approach that helps teams make faster, better-informed decisions ...