SolarWinds released the results of a survey on patch management, and introduced the latest version of SolarWinds Patch Manager, its automated patch management software solution.
The survey, which compiles the responses of over 130 IT professionals, revealed that IT pros spend a substantial amount of time manually patching.
- Almost half of the respondents said their organizations deploy patches one at a time.
- On average, 46 percent said it takes three or more hours per patch to research, script and test third-party patches.
- 23 percent of respondents reported that once the patch has been vetted, a single patch takes up to two to three days to deploy; 13 percent said four to five days and 17 percent said six to seven days.
"Time is a luxury most IT professionals don't have, yet inhibiting critical vulnerabilities through patching is something they can't ignore," said Denny LeCompte, VP of products, SolarWinds. "In the past, patch concerns were primarily about fixing bugs in the product, but organizations not applying security patches to Windows, Flash, Java, and many other third party apps are now prime targets for infestations."
- Over 20 percent of respondents said they had experienced security incidents in the past year that could have been prevented by timely patching.
- 50 percent of those respondents encountered service downtime and consequent revenue blows, 33 percent lost time recovering systems, 3 percent experienced data theft, and 3 percent saw viruses spread.
Designed to help IT pros protect servers, networks and applications against unknown vulnerabilities and pass patch compliance audits, SolarWinds Patch Manager automates the patch management process.
This saves IT pros valuable time and resources by making it easy for users to perform third-party patch management, and take advantage of and extend the capabilities of Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or System Center Configuration Manager to report, deploy, and manage third-party and Microsoft patches.
"It used to take four hours per patch for packaging and testing and about a week to deploy each patch," said Jay Harper, IT network administrator at Terminix Service, Inc. "In our experience, it now takes an hour tops with Patch Manager; it is incredible."
What's New in SolarWinds Patch Manager:
- Direct interoperability with the Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2012 and 2007 consoles, with detailed views of third-party application patches and statuses of patch updates for all endpoints
- Integration with SolarWinds' IT management solutions including Network Performance Monitor (NPM), Server & Application Monitor (SAM) and Synthetic End-User Monitor (SeUM) for adjacent viewing of important patch management data like the latest available patches and top 10 missing patches
"Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2012 works with SolarWinds to help customers keep third-party applications patched, up to date, and secure," said Raul Gonzalez, Senior Business Development Manager, Microsoft Corp. "And this capability is available directly from the Software Library page of the System Center Configuration Manager console."
The Latest
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.
The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...