
New Relic announced a suite of integrations with Amazon Web Services (AWS) that deliver New Relic's AI capabilities and observability insights directly to AWS AI services.
The integrations meet AWS developers, DevOps engineers, SREs and tier 1 and tier 2 incident responders where they work so businesses can securely accelerate AI and agentic workflows, optimize operations and reduce mean time to resolution (MTTR).
New Relic deepens its AWS collaboration by integrating its MCP Server with AWS DevOps Agent and Amazon Quick Suite to reduce manual toil and speed up incident resolution. Additionally, the company is bringing enterprise data from the Amazon Q index into New Relic AI, enabling users to connect technical failures to business impact. New Relic also unveiled Security RX Cloud to unify customers’ security and posture management.
“As organizations increasingly adopt AI and agentic workforces, leaders realize that observability isn’t optional — it’s a prerequisite for running AI in production,” said New Relic Chief Product Officer Brian Emerson. “Our integrations with AWS harness the power of agentic AI to predict issues so businesses can go beyond the black box with full-stack AI observability to speed up trouble-shooting and decision making. This fosters business growth and agentic AI in production at scale.”
The New Relic MCP Server allows popular AI assistants and agents to access detailed observability insights directly, embedding them into engineers' workflows and making them quickly actionable. Thanks to the new integration, when an alert fires, AWS DevOps Agent calls the New Relic MCP Server which generates and delivers intelligent observability insights, including root cause analysis and business context for the alert, to help the solution propose and execute mitigation actions.
The New Relic MCP Server now also integrates with Amazon Quick Suite. The application triggers the New Relic MCP Server when an alert fires, resulting in the same intelligent telemetry insights that help expedite incident management. AWS customers can expect to dramatically reduce manual toil, speeding up incident resolution and maximizing business uptime.
New Relic AI also integrates with Amazon Q index, a fully managed search service that securely retrieves and consolidates enterprise data through a single API call. The integration enables New Relic AI to access key information from across an enterprise’s data sets to provide deep insights and analysis during an incident. When an engineer asks a natural language question in New Relic AI, it invokes the Amazon Q index, which contains the organization’s enterprise data. The index responds back with relevant information, and the New Relic AI generates a coherent answer based on the initial query. This gives SREs a complete picture of an incident's technical and business impact in one place, so they can resolve it faster.
New Relic Monitoring for SAP Solutions is now available in AWS Marketplace. It features a native connector to SAP systems and non-SAP systems, clouds, processes and experiences to provide predictive and complete insights — without deploying agents in SAP. This eliminates business process interruptions related to SAP systems that cost time and money for customers to resolve.
The Latest
IT organizations have historically measured success by how quickly they can respond when something goes wrong. The entire discipline of Incident Management has been optimized around mean time to resolution, first-response SLAs and ticket closure rates. But new research suggests that even though this is a well-executed playbook, it's no longer enough to retain customers ...
Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...
Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...
Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...
While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...
For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...
As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...
The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...
The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...
Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...