Skip to main content

3 Tips for Flexible, Adaptive Incident Management

Emily Arnott
Blameless

Incidents should be your best friend. It sounds like a controversial statement. It sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. The truth is, for companies engaged in delivering any online or digital experience, taking this point of view is absolutely E-S-S-E-N-T-I-A-L. Apart from the cost of an outage in production, unplanned work created by incidents will begin to hamper feature velocity if you don't approach addressing them in the right way and there's no faster way to damage your customer relationships than recurring product outages. Whether we like it or not, responding effectively to unexpected incidents is central to modern IT Operations. Having an integrated, evolving approach to managing incidents can unlock the agility and velocity of a DevOps team and can improve the overall quality of the software they're developing. A rigid, dogmatic approach can leave that same team mired in tech debt and struggling to stay above water. The key is in viewing incidents as an opportunity to learn something new about your product and your process. If delivering a reliable product that customers will love is your goal, then how you build and operate the product is just as important as what you build. Having the right structure and process can help your engineering team stay aligned at scale. Good incident management practices can be a mechanism for interrogating the effectiveness of that structure. That's true for companies embracing ITIL, DevOps or SRE. Developing a strong incident response process is key to minimizing downtime and learning from each incident. This takes time, practice and the right tooling. So to help you get started, we've got 3 tips for creating a more flexible, adaptive framework for incident management.

1. Where You Manage Incidents Matters

There is no shortage of software solutions that claim to support incident management. That should be no surprise, managing incidents involves a complex set of tasks that include monitoring, alerting, and paging. However, to really be effective at managing incidents, a command center of sorts is needed to organize the people responsible for achieving resolution. There is no better place to locate that command center, than in the team's preferred chat bot. These offer unparalleled flexibility to recruit and coordinate the right experts. This is where targeted incident management solutions begin to separate themselves from more generic IT solutions like ITIL software. "Incident Management solutions help DevOps or SRE teams create consistent incident workflows that map to their unique needs. Those workflows can then be easily activated within their chat system and can have wide cascading effects across multiple other systems once they're activated" says Kurt Andersen, SRE architect at Blameless.

2. Never forget "Communication is key"

"The worst case scenario for many SRE leaders is a large Sev0 incident with multiple customers impacted. CEO, VPs, and CS are all reporting customer issues and asking for status updates, while it looks like there are no engineers building or executing a plan to restore service. Then the scenario repeats the next day," says Aaron Bento, Principal SRE for Arkose Labs When an engineering incident is underway, ensuring stakeholder communication is the most important responsibility of an incident commander, next to resolving the incident itself. They can handle the communications themselves or delegate to a communications lead. This may sound simple but it's anything but. Large organizations are likely to have a diverse set of stakeholders who need to be informed, not the least important of which are their customers. "Having too many cooks in the kitchen can cripple your incident response. That's why it's so important to communicate effectively, to the right stakeholders throughout the incident" says Vincent Rivellino, Head of Reliability and Developer Platforms at Mission Lane. "Also, If customers are impacted there can be a serious hit to your company's reputation. We lean into IM even for incidents where we're not breaking technology SLAs. We often need swift incident resolution followed by coordinated execution of customer remediation. For us that often involves non-technical stakeholders who are communicating with our customers. At the end of the day, the most important thing is our customers know we have their back." Whether managing internal stakeholder communications or communicating with customers, having clearly defined expectations for update cadences and automated reminders to follow up is really helpful. These are unique capabilities of modern incident management tools like Blameless that alternatives don't provide.

3. Treat incidents as opportunities

"The benefit of a more mature incident management process is identifying where the hot spots are in your product and where you as an engineering leader need to invest your team's engineering hours or budget," says Elisa Binette, Director of Engineering and Site Reliability at VMWare. If your team is interested in driving development velocity, it's not enough to try to eliminate toil from the incident response process. You need to go a step further and begin to leverage incidents proactively to identify points of weakness in your product and engineering process. This means running clear, effective retrospectives, tagging and capturing all the relevant incident data available and surfacing that back to the right stakeholders. Over time, this can help reduce the load on your entire team by making your process more efficient, your product more robust, and reducing the number of repeat incidents that your team has to manage. "If you look at incidents as an opportunity to learn about what's weak or broken in your product, and commit the right resources to addressing those weaknesses, you can quickly begin to reduce the number of repeat incidents your team encounters. Says Aaron Bento, Principal SRE for Arkose Labs. "Repeat incidents can be a killer for morale because they're a sign that we're not identifying the source of our problem. Taking a more proactive approach to incident management can really make a big difference." To maximize the value of the incident management process, your team needs opportunities to experiment, learn and iterate. With the right tooling and the right approach, you'll soon be turning disruptive incidents into valuable insights.

Emily Arnott is Community Relations Manager at Blameless

The Latest

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...

Government agencies are largely misjudging their level of AI governance as the technology permeates their organization, according to Racing to Deploy: How Public Sector AI Adoption is Moving Faster Than the Foundations Needed to Support It, a new report from SolarWinds ...

3 Tips for Flexible, Adaptive Incident Management

Emily Arnott
Blameless

Incidents should be your best friend. It sounds like a controversial statement. It sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. The truth is, for companies engaged in delivering any online or digital experience, taking this point of view is absolutely E-S-S-E-N-T-I-A-L. Apart from the cost of an outage in production, unplanned work created by incidents will begin to hamper feature velocity if you don't approach addressing them in the right way and there's no faster way to damage your customer relationships than recurring product outages. Whether we like it or not, responding effectively to unexpected incidents is central to modern IT Operations. Having an integrated, evolving approach to managing incidents can unlock the agility and velocity of a DevOps team and can improve the overall quality of the software they're developing. A rigid, dogmatic approach can leave that same team mired in tech debt and struggling to stay above water. The key is in viewing incidents as an opportunity to learn something new about your product and your process. If delivering a reliable product that customers will love is your goal, then how you build and operate the product is just as important as what you build. Having the right structure and process can help your engineering team stay aligned at scale. Good incident management practices can be a mechanism for interrogating the effectiveness of that structure. That's true for companies embracing ITIL, DevOps or SRE. Developing a strong incident response process is key to minimizing downtime and learning from each incident. This takes time, practice and the right tooling. So to help you get started, we've got 3 tips for creating a more flexible, adaptive framework for incident management.

1. Where You Manage Incidents Matters

There is no shortage of software solutions that claim to support incident management. That should be no surprise, managing incidents involves a complex set of tasks that include monitoring, alerting, and paging. However, to really be effective at managing incidents, a command center of sorts is needed to organize the people responsible for achieving resolution. There is no better place to locate that command center, than in the team's preferred chat bot. These offer unparalleled flexibility to recruit and coordinate the right experts. This is where targeted incident management solutions begin to separate themselves from more generic IT solutions like ITIL software. "Incident Management solutions help DevOps or SRE teams create consistent incident workflows that map to their unique needs. Those workflows can then be easily activated within their chat system and can have wide cascading effects across multiple other systems once they're activated" says Kurt Andersen, SRE architect at Blameless.

2. Never forget "Communication is key"

"The worst case scenario for many SRE leaders is a large Sev0 incident with multiple customers impacted. CEO, VPs, and CS are all reporting customer issues and asking for status updates, while it looks like there are no engineers building or executing a plan to restore service. Then the scenario repeats the next day," says Aaron Bento, Principal SRE for Arkose Labs When an engineering incident is underway, ensuring stakeholder communication is the most important responsibility of an incident commander, next to resolving the incident itself. They can handle the communications themselves or delegate to a communications lead. This may sound simple but it's anything but. Large organizations are likely to have a diverse set of stakeholders who need to be informed, not the least important of which are their customers. "Having too many cooks in the kitchen can cripple your incident response. That's why it's so important to communicate effectively, to the right stakeholders throughout the incident" says Vincent Rivellino, Head of Reliability and Developer Platforms at Mission Lane. "Also, If customers are impacted there can be a serious hit to your company's reputation. We lean into IM even for incidents where we're not breaking technology SLAs. We often need swift incident resolution followed by coordinated execution of customer remediation. For us that often involves non-technical stakeholders who are communicating with our customers. At the end of the day, the most important thing is our customers know we have their back." Whether managing internal stakeholder communications or communicating with customers, having clearly defined expectations for update cadences and automated reminders to follow up is really helpful. These are unique capabilities of modern incident management tools like Blameless that alternatives don't provide.

3. Treat incidents as opportunities

"The benefit of a more mature incident management process is identifying where the hot spots are in your product and where you as an engineering leader need to invest your team's engineering hours or budget," says Elisa Binette, Director of Engineering and Site Reliability at VMWare. If your team is interested in driving development velocity, it's not enough to try to eliminate toil from the incident response process. You need to go a step further and begin to leverage incidents proactively to identify points of weakness in your product and engineering process. This means running clear, effective retrospectives, tagging and capturing all the relevant incident data available and surfacing that back to the right stakeholders. Over time, this can help reduce the load on your entire team by making your process more efficient, your product more robust, and reducing the number of repeat incidents that your team has to manage. "If you look at incidents as an opportunity to learn about what's weak or broken in your product, and commit the right resources to addressing those weaknesses, you can quickly begin to reduce the number of repeat incidents your team encounters. Says Aaron Bento, Principal SRE for Arkose Labs. "Repeat incidents can be a killer for morale because they're a sign that we're not identifying the source of our problem. Taking a more proactive approach to incident management can really make a big difference." To maximize the value of the incident management process, your team needs opportunities to experiment, learn and iterate. With the right tooling and the right approach, you'll soon be turning disruptive incidents into valuable insights.

Emily Arnott is Community Relations Manager at Blameless

The Latest

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...

Government agencies are largely misjudging their level of AI governance as the technology permeates their organization, according to Racing to Deploy: How Public Sector AI Adoption is Moving Faster Than the Foundations Needed to Support It, a new report from SolarWinds ...