Skip to main content

4 Tips to Increase Velocity in Your ITIL-Based Change Process

For those of us who handle IT change requests on a daily basis, the process can seem as onerous as a Sisyphean task. In this case, rather than a boulder rolling back down the hill, it is the backlog of RFCs that seem to grow every time you complete a request. Let’s face it - the requests are not going to stop coming. The business is trying to change faster, so they need IT to implement change faster. In the end, it is all about doing as much as you can with what you have. Following ITIL best practices and using a solid change management tool goes a long way, but how can the whole task be made less Sisyphean?

The answer may come from borrowing some of the lessons learned from application development. It turns out that many of the same agile practices adopted by programmers over the last decade can greatly improve the continuity, speed and predictability of your organization's IT Change Management – leveraging, not replacing, your existing ITIL best practices and tools.

When you view the never-ending flow of RFCs as roughly equivalent to the flow of feature requests that an application development team receives, and recognize that the goals are the same - to implement the changes as quickly as possible, as close to the user’s expectations as possible, and in a predictable amount of time - then it becomes clear there is much overlap between processing change requests and turning around new features in a software application.

Of course, some of those change requests are for application development, and those clearly lend themselves to agile practices. But as it turns out, agile methodology can help IT manage all types of requests.

It is possible to apply agile practices to the flow of IT change requests and see these same benefits. Here are some specific ideas on how to implement agile methodology without abandoning ITIL best practices or your current change management tool:

1. Use CAB Meetings to Prioritize Backlog

Take an agile methodology mindset to CAB. Instead of holding weekly or monthly CABs, have daily scrums to prioritize change requests. Place the less urgent and non-routine requests on a backlog. Let the responsible teams decide how much of the backlog they can achieve in a short period of time, say two weeks.

In your Change Management tool, create views that clearly indicate which requests are on the backlog, and which are in process.

2. User Stories with Story Points help Document RFCs

Scrutinize the change requests to ensure they are properly broken down, the same way agile software developers break down feature requests into User Stories with Story Points assigned and weighted.

Leveraging the customizability of your change management tool, re-label the Description field as User Story and add a field to contain the Story Points. For most IT organizations, the change requests are relatively short lived and independent of each other. But if your organization has enough large, complex requests that are related to a given system or project, following the agile technique of grouping them into a sprint may make sense. You may even consider forming two teams, one team that manages the shorter lived requests as a constant stream, perhaps using a Kanban approach; while the larger requests flow into a team using a scrum approach.

3. Change Manager becomes Scrum Master

The Change Manager acts as the Scrum Manager, overseeing quick daily standup meetings to talk about progress on the tickets in process. The Scrum Master’s mantra: plan a little, do a little, test a little - create a tight feedback loop.

In a larger organization, where the Change Manager cannot possibly have the bandwidth to be the Scrum Master for all of the supported services, the technical owner of a business service may need to act as the Scrum Master, with the Change Manager overseeing the various business Scrum Masters.

It is important that someone fills the role as Scrum Master in order to insure that the amount of work in process is always minimal (agile methodology is all about finishing what you start and delivering each item before you bite off another). As such, it is critical for the Scrum Master to monitor the batch of changes in progress on a day-to-day basis and be available to help clear roadblocks for those implementing the changes.

4. Continuous Improvement to Optimize Agility

By assigning a size in the form of Story Points and by minimizing the amount of work in progress at a given time, you can judge the velocity of successful changes and provide more transparency into what the bottlenecks are.

As requests are completed, the Story Points assigned to the requests represent a quantity of work completed. The average rate of delivering Story Points over time is the velocity. By charting changes in velocity over time, you can better manage your team’s bandwidth and better predict the time required to work down the backlog of requests.

Increasing the velocity becomes the challenge. Agile prescribes various approaches to eliminate the bottlenecks preventing a faster velocity. The best approach for a handling a continuous stream of requests, where they are not batched into sprints, is likely a cumulative flow diagram. However, if you are batching your requests into sprints, then a scrum approach using a burn down chart may work better.

Either of these approaches can be diagrammed in Excel by exporting the data you collect in your change management tool.

In summary, the best way to attack that seemingly always growing backlog of RFCs requires an ability to expose the bottlenecks that are impacting your ability to increase the speed and predictability by which the requests can be implemented. One way, is to borrow agile software development techniques and overlay them on your existing ITIL processes and tools.

ABOUT Russ Miller

Russ Miller is the CTO of SunView Software, Inc., an ITSM tools vendor he co-founded. He has more than 20 years of experience leading software product development from concept to delivery for companies like IBM, Compuware, Quark, and Intuit. He was an early advocate and adopter of agile software practices and has been immersed in ITIL over the last decade as part of developing the ChangGear ITSM solution.

Related Links:

www.sunviewsoftware.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

4 Tips to Increase Velocity in Your ITIL-Based Change Process

For those of us who handle IT change requests on a daily basis, the process can seem as onerous as a Sisyphean task. In this case, rather than a boulder rolling back down the hill, it is the backlog of RFCs that seem to grow every time you complete a request. Let’s face it - the requests are not going to stop coming. The business is trying to change faster, so they need IT to implement change faster. In the end, it is all about doing as much as you can with what you have. Following ITIL best practices and using a solid change management tool goes a long way, but how can the whole task be made less Sisyphean?

The answer may come from borrowing some of the lessons learned from application development. It turns out that many of the same agile practices adopted by programmers over the last decade can greatly improve the continuity, speed and predictability of your organization's IT Change Management – leveraging, not replacing, your existing ITIL best practices and tools.

When you view the never-ending flow of RFCs as roughly equivalent to the flow of feature requests that an application development team receives, and recognize that the goals are the same - to implement the changes as quickly as possible, as close to the user’s expectations as possible, and in a predictable amount of time - then it becomes clear there is much overlap between processing change requests and turning around new features in a software application.

Of course, some of those change requests are for application development, and those clearly lend themselves to agile practices. But as it turns out, agile methodology can help IT manage all types of requests.

It is possible to apply agile practices to the flow of IT change requests and see these same benefits. Here are some specific ideas on how to implement agile methodology without abandoning ITIL best practices or your current change management tool:

1. Use CAB Meetings to Prioritize Backlog

Take an agile methodology mindset to CAB. Instead of holding weekly or monthly CABs, have daily scrums to prioritize change requests. Place the less urgent and non-routine requests on a backlog. Let the responsible teams decide how much of the backlog they can achieve in a short period of time, say two weeks.

In your Change Management tool, create views that clearly indicate which requests are on the backlog, and which are in process.

2. User Stories with Story Points help Document RFCs

Scrutinize the change requests to ensure they are properly broken down, the same way agile software developers break down feature requests into User Stories with Story Points assigned and weighted.

Leveraging the customizability of your change management tool, re-label the Description field as User Story and add a field to contain the Story Points. For most IT organizations, the change requests are relatively short lived and independent of each other. But if your organization has enough large, complex requests that are related to a given system or project, following the agile technique of grouping them into a sprint may make sense. You may even consider forming two teams, one team that manages the shorter lived requests as a constant stream, perhaps using a Kanban approach; while the larger requests flow into a team using a scrum approach.

3. Change Manager becomes Scrum Master

The Change Manager acts as the Scrum Manager, overseeing quick daily standup meetings to talk about progress on the tickets in process. The Scrum Master’s mantra: plan a little, do a little, test a little - create a tight feedback loop.

In a larger organization, where the Change Manager cannot possibly have the bandwidth to be the Scrum Master for all of the supported services, the technical owner of a business service may need to act as the Scrum Master, with the Change Manager overseeing the various business Scrum Masters.

It is important that someone fills the role as Scrum Master in order to insure that the amount of work in process is always minimal (agile methodology is all about finishing what you start and delivering each item before you bite off another). As such, it is critical for the Scrum Master to monitor the batch of changes in progress on a day-to-day basis and be available to help clear roadblocks for those implementing the changes.

4. Continuous Improvement to Optimize Agility

By assigning a size in the form of Story Points and by minimizing the amount of work in progress at a given time, you can judge the velocity of successful changes and provide more transparency into what the bottlenecks are.

As requests are completed, the Story Points assigned to the requests represent a quantity of work completed. The average rate of delivering Story Points over time is the velocity. By charting changes in velocity over time, you can better manage your team’s bandwidth and better predict the time required to work down the backlog of requests.

Increasing the velocity becomes the challenge. Agile prescribes various approaches to eliminate the bottlenecks preventing a faster velocity. The best approach for a handling a continuous stream of requests, where they are not batched into sprints, is likely a cumulative flow diagram. However, if you are batching your requests into sprints, then a scrum approach using a burn down chart may work better.

Either of these approaches can be diagrammed in Excel by exporting the data you collect in your change management tool.

In summary, the best way to attack that seemingly always growing backlog of RFCs requires an ability to expose the bottlenecks that are impacting your ability to increase the speed and predictability by which the requests can be implemented. One way, is to borrow agile software development techniques and overlay them on your existing ITIL processes and tools.

ABOUT Russ Miller

Russ Miller is the CTO of SunView Software, Inc., an ITSM tools vendor he co-founded. He has more than 20 years of experience leading software product development from concept to delivery for companies like IBM, Compuware, Quark, and Intuit. He was an early advocate and adopter of agile software practices and has been immersed in ITIL over the last decade as part of developing the ChangGear ITSM solution.

Related Links:

www.sunviewsoftware.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...