Skip to main content

AI Drives Surge in Data Budgets

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs.

Data Budgets Spike

According to the report, data budgets are growing significantly this year with 30% of participants reporting budget growth compared to just 9% last year.

Additionally, AI tooling was recognized as the largest area of investment for the year ahead with 45% of respondents citing it as a key priority.

Data team sizes are increasing too (40% reported growth, compared to 14% last year), clearly demonstrating how AI is driving demand for larger teams that can better ensure high quality, governed data.

Additionally, as data budgets increase, so have salaries in North America, with 80% of individual contributors making over $100,000 (compared to 69% last year) and 49% of managers making over $200,000 (compared to 32% last year).

Data Teams Increase AI Usage

AI isn't just fueling investment, it's also disrupting the way data professionals operate. The report found that 80% of respondents are using AI in their daily workflow, compared to just 30% last year. Of those using AI daily, 70% said they use AI for code development and 50% use it for documentation.

Organizations are clearly increasing investments in tools to accelerate — not replace — their data teams, and leveraging AI in the data workflow is improving developer productivity while bolstering data quality in the process. As a result, company perception of data teams is positive, with respondents overwhelmingly agreeing (75%) that their organization values the data team.

"AI is disrupting the way that teams work with organizational data," said Mark Porter, CTO of dbt Labs. "As companies increase AI investments, leaders are prioritizing the teams responsible for data quality and governance — the essential foundation for AI effectiveness. At the same time, data engineers are turning to AI to automate routine tasks, completely changing how data is delivered to the business. Because of this, the strategic role of the data team continues to grow, with AI as the catalyst. It's a symbiotic relationship — data professionals make AI better, and AI makes data teams better."

Looking to the Future

Effective AI requires high quality inputs, and poor data quality continues to be the challenge most frequently reported (56% of respondents). That's why building trust in data is cited as the top priority for growing data teams, accentuating the importance of data governance and observability — and data professionals are hopeful that AI can help. Data teams are optimistic about the potential impact of AI in the analytics workflow, citing its ability to help bridge the data quality gap with features like proactive data monitoring and pipeline debugging.

Methodology: dbt Labs surveyed 459 data practitioners and leaders from October 8, 2024 through December 27, 2024. 70% of survey respondents are individual contributors (ICs) and 30% are managers. Analytics engineers made up 48% of IC respondents, 36% of IC respondents are data engineers, and 16% of IC respondents are data analysts.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

AI Drives Surge in Data Budgets

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs.

Data Budgets Spike

According to the report, data budgets are growing significantly this year with 30% of participants reporting budget growth compared to just 9% last year.

Additionally, AI tooling was recognized as the largest area of investment for the year ahead with 45% of respondents citing it as a key priority.

Data team sizes are increasing too (40% reported growth, compared to 14% last year), clearly demonstrating how AI is driving demand for larger teams that can better ensure high quality, governed data.

Additionally, as data budgets increase, so have salaries in North America, with 80% of individual contributors making over $100,000 (compared to 69% last year) and 49% of managers making over $200,000 (compared to 32% last year).

Data Teams Increase AI Usage

AI isn't just fueling investment, it's also disrupting the way data professionals operate. The report found that 80% of respondents are using AI in their daily workflow, compared to just 30% last year. Of those using AI daily, 70% said they use AI for code development and 50% use it for documentation.

Organizations are clearly increasing investments in tools to accelerate — not replace — their data teams, and leveraging AI in the data workflow is improving developer productivity while bolstering data quality in the process. As a result, company perception of data teams is positive, with respondents overwhelmingly agreeing (75%) that their organization values the data team.

"AI is disrupting the way that teams work with organizational data," said Mark Porter, CTO of dbt Labs. "As companies increase AI investments, leaders are prioritizing the teams responsible for data quality and governance — the essential foundation for AI effectiveness. At the same time, data engineers are turning to AI to automate routine tasks, completely changing how data is delivered to the business. Because of this, the strategic role of the data team continues to grow, with AI as the catalyst. It's a symbiotic relationship — data professionals make AI better, and AI makes data teams better."

Looking to the Future

Effective AI requires high quality inputs, and poor data quality continues to be the challenge most frequently reported (56% of respondents). That's why building trust in data is cited as the top priority for growing data teams, accentuating the importance of data governance and observability — and data professionals are hopeful that AI can help. Data teams are optimistic about the potential impact of AI in the analytics workflow, citing its ability to help bridge the data quality gap with features like proactive data monitoring and pipeline debugging.

Methodology: dbt Labs surveyed 459 data practitioners and leaders from October 8, 2024 through December 27, 2024. 70% of survey respondents are individual contributors (ICs) and 30% are managers. Analytics engineers made up 48% of IC respondents, 36% of IC respondents are data engineers, and 16% of IC respondents are data analysts.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...