Skip to main content

5 Key Takeaways from the 2025 Observability Forecast

Nic Benders
New Relic

At New Relic, we're well-known Data Nerds. So when we want to understand how our industry is changing and how people are doing, we want data. New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast analyzes data from a survey of over 1,700 IT and engineering leaders and team members across 23 countries and 11 industries. This year's report offers key insights into growth areas, challenges, and trends that are influencing observability investments, like the growing adoption of enterprise AI.

In particular, it found that with a median annual cost of high-impact IT outages reaching $76 million, organizations are investing in AI-strengthened observability to detect and resolve issues faster.

Here are 5 key takeaways from this year's report:

1. AI monitoring is on the rise

As organizations turn AI pilot programs into permanent tools for day-to-day functions, monitoring is more important than ever. Leaders need real-time insight into how complex, distributed systems behave and interact in order to avoid hidden failures. Using AI-powered observability platforms in real time reveals how AI models interact with pipelines, APIs, and downstream applications.

The report found that 54% of IT professionals use the AI monitoring feature of observability, up from 42% last year, representing double-digit growth. Meanwhile, only 4% of businesses say they have no plans to adopt AI monitoring. In addition, executives and technology leaders cite AI-assisted troubleshooting as the number one AI feature they think would improve  their organization's incident response practice.

2. Observability significantly reduces downtime

Downtime has evolved from an IT concern into a board-level risk. In our survey, organizations reported a median cost of $2 million per hour for high-impact outages, a figure that highlights the considerable financial exposure that comes with even brief disruptions.

The root causes of these costly outages reflect the complexity of modern digital environments. Network failure (35%) and third-party provider issues (28%) remain the leading culprits, underscoring the fragility of interconnected systems. The adoption of observability minimizes the duration of those outages. Nearly seven in 10 of the organizations surveyed reported measured improvements in mean time to detect (MTTD) since investing in observability, confirming that visibility and speed are both technical wins and financial imperatives.

3. AI-enhanced observability makes time for innovation and improves efficiency

Engineers report that they spend 33% of their time firefighting or addressing technical disruptions rather than developing new features or innovating. Streamlined observability workflows, especially with AI-powered assistance, allow engineers to identify issues quickly, reducing the cognitive load and frustration associated with debugging complex systems.

When less of their time is consumed by reactive work, engineering teams can dedicate more effort to building new features, improving existing products, and innovating. Developers say that observability leads to faster troubleshooting and root cause analysis (58%) and improved collaboration across teams (52%).

4. Organizations still lag in their adoption of full-stack observability

While the benefits of monitoring are clear, 73% of organizations still lack full-stack observability, leaving broad segments of their technology infrastructure and applications more likely to disrupt operations or customer experiences. Consumer complaints, manual checks, or incidents are still used to identify service interruptions 41% of the time. Disconnected monitoring tools and siloed data make diagnosing an incident a more complicated puzzle, slowing down response times and increasing the cost of outages.

Meanwhile, just 23% of teams with full-stack observability report high-impact outages at least weekly, compared with the 40% that don't use it. Additionally, they detect outages seven minutes faster and reduce the average hourly cost by 50%, to $1 million.

5. More organizations are consolidating their observability tools

Organizations are actively working to simplify their digital workflows. The average number of observability tools per organization has dropped 27% since 2023, from 6 to 4.4. Further, 52% of organizations plan to consolidate observability tools onto a unified platform in the next 12 to 24 months. This trend reflects a recognition that an abundance of tools can create as many problems as they solve, requiring users to manually toggle between platforms.

AI-strengthened observability, or what we call "Intelligent observability" is rapidly emerging as the connective tissue that makes AI reliable and useful — enabling organizations to predict and prevent outages, optimize costs, and scale innovation with confidence and responsibility.

Nic Benders is Chief Technical Strategist at New Relic

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

5 Key Takeaways from the 2025 Observability Forecast

Nic Benders
New Relic

At New Relic, we're well-known Data Nerds. So when we want to understand how our industry is changing and how people are doing, we want data. New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast analyzes data from a survey of over 1,700 IT and engineering leaders and team members across 23 countries and 11 industries. This year's report offers key insights into growth areas, challenges, and trends that are influencing observability investments, like the growing adoption of enterprise AI.

In particular, it found that with a median annual cost of high-impact IT outages reaching $76 million, organizations are investing in AI-strengthened observability to detect and resolve issues faster.

Here are 5 key takeaways from this year's report:

1. AI monitoring is on the rise

As organizations turn AI pilot programs into permanent tools for day-to-day functions, monitoring is more important than ever. Leaders need real-time insight into how complex, distributed systems behave and interact in order to avoid hidden failures. Using AI-powered observability platforms in real time reveals how AI models interact with pipelines, APIs, and downstream applications.

The report found that 54% of IT professionals use the AI monitoring feature of observability, up from 42% last year, representing double-digit growth. Meanwhile, only 4% of businesses say they have no plans to adopt AI monitoring. In addition, executives and technology leaders cite AI-assisted troubleshooting as the number one AI feature they think would improve  their organization's incident response practice.

2. Observability significantly reduces downtime

Downtime has evolved from an IT concern into a board-level risk. In our survey, organizations reported a median cost of $2 million per hour for high-impact outages, a figure that highlights the considerable financial exposure that comes with even brief disruptions.

The root causes of these costly outages reflect the complexity of modern digital environments. Network failure (35%) and third-party provider issues (28%) remain the leading culprits, underscoring the fragility of interconnected systems. The adoption of observability minimizes the duration of those outages. Nearly seven in 10 of the organizations surveyed reported measured improvements in mean time to detect (MTTD) since investing in observability, confirming that visibility and speed are both technical wins and financial imperatives.

3. AI-enhanced observability makes time for innovation and improves efficiency

Engineers report that they spend 33% of their time firefighting or addressing technical disruptions rather than developing new features or innovating. Streamlined observability workflows, especially with AI-powered assistance, allow engineers to identify issues quickly, reducing the cognitive load and frustration associated with debugging complex systems.

When less of their time is consumed by reactive work, engineering teams can dedicate more effort to building new features, improving existing products, and innovating. Developers say that observability leads to faster troubleshooting and root cause analysis (58%) and improved collaboration across teams (52%).

4. Organizations still lag in their adoption of full-stack observability

While the benefits of monitoring are clear, 73% of organizations still lack full-stack observability, leaving broad segments of their technology infrastructure and applications more likely to disrupt operations or customer experiences. Consumer complaints, manual checks, or incidents are still used to identify service interruptions 41% of the time. Disconnected monitoring tools and siloed data make diagnosing an incident a more complicated puzzle, slowing down response times and increasing the cost of outages.

Meanwhile, just 23% of teams with full-stack observability report high-impact outages at least weekly, compared with the 40% that don't use it. Additionally, they detect outages seven minutes faster and reduce the average hourly cost by 50%, to $1 million.

5. More organizations are consolidating their observability tools

Organizations are actively working to simplify their digital workflows. The average number of observability tools per organization has dropped 27% since 2023, from 6 to 4.4. Further, 52% of organizations plan to consolidate observability tools onto a unified platform in the next 12 to 24 months. This trend reflects a recognition that an abundance of tools can create as many problems as they solve, requiring users to manually toggle between platforms.

AI-strengthened observability, or what we call "Intelligent observability" is rapidly emerging as the connective tissue that makes AI reliable and useful — enabling organizations to predict and prevent outages, optimize costs, and scale innovation with confidence and responsibility.

Nic Benders is Chief Technical Strategist at New Relic

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...