Skip to main content

Advanced IT Analytics: Making it Simpler to Optimize What's More Complex

Dennis Drogseth

The growing market for analytics in IT is one of the more exciting areas to watch in the technology industry. Exciting because of the variety and types of vendor innovation in this area. And exciting as well because our research indicates the adoption of advanced IT analytics supports data sharing and joint decision making in a way that's catalytic for both IT and digital transformation.

On the other hand, IT analytics are not necessarily a panacea. Some of the offerings, rich in potential, are also so rich in complexity that actual use case justification and time to value can create more of a wall blocking forward progress than a bridge crossing the IT-to-business divide.

Moreover, many IT organizations are still resolutely in build-your-own mode using backend data lakes and homemade analytic techniques that can create another steep impasse. In fact, EMA's advanced IT analytics research shows that only 37% of IT organizations are seeking primarily a third-party source for advanced IT analytics, with 39% taking a primarily in-house approach and 24% claiming an even mix of both. When asked what the primary obstacle was to going forward with advanced analytics, the top-line answer was the technology products are not yet fully baked.

Part of the problem in the market (using the term loosely because IT analytics really span multiple markets) is understanding use case. Too many analytics initiatives are focused on data collection without a clear sense of priority, relevance or value. By way of analogy, this is something we saw and still see in our consulting in support of CMDB and CMS solutions. The first thing you want to ask yourself, is what do you want to achieve? What are your (and your organizations') priorities?

Are they, for instance…

■ Performance and availability management across the application infrastructure?

■ Support for understanding the impacts of change and optimizing change for performance?

■ Optimizing cloud resources (public and or private) for service delivery, value and cost — including insights into capacity and usage?

■ Optimizing IT for DevOps and agile efficiencies?

■ Integrated security with performance and change management (SecOps)?

■ Or financial optimization of IT across the board in terms of cost and value from an OpEx and CapEx perspective?

And this list is far from complete.

The truth is, in many cases some of the same data can be applied to virtually all of the above use cases. But the truth is also that to maximize the value of those data interdependencies, significant levels of maturity in reporting and analysis, and flexibility in deployment, are 100% required.

Based on our research, the most in-demand set of objectives for IT analytics is something of a mosaic. It combines performance and availability management, with insights into infrastructure utilization, along with support for cloud migration and DevOps. And in this, increasingly, lurk security concerns as well.

For instance, the top five objectives in leveraging IT analytics in support of cloud were:

■ Improved network security

■ Hybrid cloud optimization

■ Compliance

■ Integrated security and performance

■ Real-time service performance

Note how intertwined security and performance are, along with needs for optimization and real-time insights.

When it came to issues surrounding leveraging AIA for optimizing change, cloud migration dominated — with three of the first four areas of concern, including: public cloud efficiencies, internal cloud efficiencies, and hybrid cloud efficiencies — all virtually tied. The first-ranked issue for optimizing change had to do with managing data for consistency, currency and accuracy.

When it came to DevOps and agile, tops on the IT analytics agenda were:

■ Optimizing application performance by providing feedback to development from production.

■ Minimizing the time developers spend troubleshooting production performance issues.

■ Supporting application developers directly (with performance insights).

I'd also like to point out that selecting advanced IT analytics solutions requires planning for you to meet your own unique requirements. These are never generic, and fortunately the emerging choices are far from generic as well. Moreover, effectively deploying a transformative analytic technology requires a willingness across IT to work in new, more collaborative and more efficient ways.

With all this in mind, I'll be looking more closely at how advanced analytics for IT are being designed, deployed and adopted in the coming months. So stay tuned. There's more to come.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Advanced IT Analytics: Making it Simpler to Optimize What's More Complex

Dennis Drogseth

The growing market for analytics in IT is one of the more exciting areas to watch in the technology industry. Exciting because of the variety and types of vendor innovation in this area. And exciting as well because our research indicates the adoption of advanced IT analytics supports data sharing and joint decision making in a way that's catalytic for both IT and digital transformation.

On the other hand, IT analytics are not necessarily a panacea. Some of the offerings, rich in potential, are also so rich in complexity that actual use case justification and time to value can create more of a wall blocking forward progress than a bridge crossing the IT-to-business divide.

Moreover, many IT organizations are still resolutely in build-your-own mode using backend data lakes and homemade analytic techniques that can create another steep impasse. In fact, EMA's advanced IT analytics research shows that only 37% of IT organizations are seeking primarily a third-party source for advanced IT analytics, with 39% taking a primarily in-house approach and 24% claiming an even mix of both. When asked what the primary obstacle was to going forward with advanced analytics, the top-line answer was the technology products are not yet fully baked.

Part of the problem in the market (using the term loosely because IT analytics really span multiple markets) is understanding use case. Too many analytics initiatives are focused on data collection without a clear sense of priority, relevance or value. By way of analogy, this is something we saw and still see in our consulting in support of CMDB and CMS solutions. The first thing you want to ask yourself, is what do you want to achieve? What are your (and your organizations') priorities?

Are they, for instance…

■ Performance and availability management across the application infrastructure?

■ Support for understanding the impacts of change and optimizing change for performance?

■ Optimizing cloud resources (public and or private) for service delivery, value and cost — including insights into capacity and usage?

■ Optimizing IT for DevOps and agile efficiencies?

■ Integrated security with performance and change management (SecOps)?

■ Or financial optimization of IT across the board in terms of cost and value from an OpEx and CapEx perspective?

And this list is far from complete.

The truth is, in many cases some of the same data can be applied to virtually all of the above use cases. But the truth is also that to maximize the value of those data interdependencies, significant levels of maturity in reporting and analysis, and flexibility in deployment, are 100% required.

Based on our research, the most in-demand set of objectives for IT analytics is something of a mosaic. It combines performance and availability management, with insights into infrastructure utilization, along with support for cloud migration and DevOps. And in this, increasingly, lurk security concerns as well.

For instance, the top five objectives in leveraging IT analytics in support of cloud were:

■ Improved network security

■ Hybrid cloud optimization

■ Compliance

■ Integrated security and performance

■ Real-time service performance

Note how intertwined security and performance are, along with needs for optimization and real-time insights.

When it came to issues surrounding leveraging AIA for optimizing change, cloud migration dominated — with three of the first four areas of concern, including: public cloud efficiencies, internal cloud efficiencies, and hybrid cloud efficiencies — all virtually tied. The first-ranked issue for optimizing change had to do with managing data for consistency, currency and accuracy.

When it came to DevOps and agile, tops on the IT analytics agenda were:

■ Optimizing application performance by providing feedback to development from production.

■ Minimizing the time developers spend troubleshooting production performance issues.

■ Supporting application developers directly (with performance insights).

I'd also like to point out that selecting advanced IT analytics solutions requires planning for you to meet your own unique requirements. These are never generic, and fortunately the emerging choices are far from generic as well. Moreover, effectively deploying a transformative analytic technology requires a willingness across IT to work in new, more collaborative and more efficient ways.

With all this in mind, I'll be looking more closely at how advanced analytics for IT are being designed, deployed and adopted in the coming months. So stay tuned. There's more to come.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...