Skip to main content

AI First? Why CIOs Are Putting the Cart Before the Horse

The 2026 NetOps Reality: You Can't Modernize with AI Until You Fix Visibility and Automation
Jeremy Rossbach

The conversation around AI in the enterprise has officially shifted from "if" to "how fast." But according to the State of Network Operations 2026 report from Broadcom, most organizations are unknowingly building their AI strategies on sand.

The data is clear: CIOs and network teams are putting the cart before the horse. AI cannot improve what the network cannot see, predict issues without historical context, automate processes that aren't standardized, or recommend fixes when the underlying telemetry is incomplete. If AI is the brain, then network observability is the nervous system that makes intelligent action possible.

The Core Problem: AI Needs Good Data, and Networks Aren't Providing It

The report reveals a troubling pattern:

  • 87% say cloud and internet usage creates critical blind spots.
  • 95% lack visibility into at least one major segment of their delivery chain.
  • 39% say insufficient visibility is directly impacting AI success.
  • 71% don't fully trust AI in network operations.

Why the mistrust?

Because AI is only as reliable as the data you feed it, and the data today is incomplete. Public cloud paths, remote work connections, ISP transport layers, and peering networks remain black boxes, yet companies are trying to deploy AI-driven triage and AI-driven automation on top of them. It's the equivalent of asking a self-driving car to navigate with half a windshield.

Before We Talk About AI, We Need to Talk About Order

There is a simple, non-negotiable sequence for modern networking success:

1. Visibility Enables Trust

You cannot automate what you cannot see, and you cannot trust AI-driven decisions when the data behind them is partial or ambiguous. The report makes this clear in no uncertain terms: cloud-to-cloud visibility, real-time path validation, ISP metrics, and public cloud telemetry are all required. Yet only 5% of respondents say they receive the ISP data they need, underscoring a simple truth that without visibility, trust is impossible.

2. Automation Enables Scale

Once you have reliable telemetry, patterns emerge: including baselines, repeated bottlenecks, behavior over time, capacity trends and known-good configurations. These patterns form the backbone of automation. However, today, only 27% of companies have mature automation practices. A full 70% are still early to mid-stage. Why so low? Because automation depends on accuracy. And accuracy depends on visibility. Automation cannot scale when your data is fragmented, when paths are unknown, or when you're still troubleshooting ISPs manually.

Which brings us to the final step.

3. AI Enables Foresight

AI is the multiplier. AI is the prediction engine. AI is the triage assistant that cuts MTTR and solves problems before users feel them. But AI is the last step and not the first. The report's adoption numbers prove enterprises are trying to skip ahead. 92% plan to use AI-enabled network operations solutions, but only 23% have anything deployed and a full 71% don't trust AI yet.

Why not? Because AI recommendations can't be trusted until the data is complete, the telemetry is continuous, the automation workflows are consistent and the visibility is fully end-to-end. AI doesn't magically fix missing data. AI makes missing data more dangerous.

The Right Path: Visibility → Automation → AI

Every CIO and NetOps leader should use this sequence as the modernization roadmap:

Step 1 - Expand Visibility - Goal: create trustworthy data

Expanding visibility means achieving full-path insight from the user all the way to the application, across both overlay and underlay networks. It requires comprehensive coverage of cloud environments, the public internet, and ISP infrastructure, combined with real-time and historical perspectives.

Step 2 - Scale with Automation - Goal: create consistent, repeatable execution

Take the high-fidelity telemetry and build: automated troubleshooting, automated remediation, automated policy deployment and automated performance baselining.

Step 3 - Apply AI for Foresight - Goal: create proactive, intelligent operations

Once trust and scale exist, AI becomes: predictive, accurate, reliable, safe and transformative.

But again — in that order.

The CIO Takeaway

AI is not your starting point; it is the reward for doing visibility and automation right. The message from the 2026 data is not subtle: AI initiatives are outpacing the network's readiness to support them. Until visibility gaps are closed and automation matures, network teams will continue to struggle, budgets will be strained, and enterprises will underperform on AI ROI. Your network observability stack is the AI data engine, your automation layer is the AI execution engine, and your AI platform is the intelligence engine. Mixing up this order doesn't accelerate progress; it sabotages it.

Final Thoughts

If enterprises want AI to truly deliver, powering autonomous triage, proactive remediation, intelligent routing, predictive detection, and real-time optimization, then the sequence is clear: visibility enables trust, automation enables scale, AI enables foresight and the companies that follow this order will win the AI era of NetOps.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

AI First? Why CIOs Are Putting the Cart Before the Horse

The 2026 NetOps Reality: You Can't Modernize with AI Until You Fix Visibility and Automation
Jeremy Rossbach

The conversation around AI in the enterprise has officially shifted from "if" to "how fast." But according to the State of Network Operations 2026 report from Broadcom, most organizations are unknowingly building their AI strategies on sand.

The data is clear: CIOs and network teams are putting the cart before the horse. AI cannot improve what the network cannot see, predict issues without historical context, automate processes that aren't standardized, or recommend fixes when the underlying telemetry is incomplete. If AI is the brain, then network observability is the nervous system that makes intelligent action possible.

The Core Problem: AI Needs Good Data, and Networks Aren't Providing It

The report reveals a troubling pattern:

  • 87% say cloud and internet usage creates critical blind spots.
  • 95% lack visibility into at least one major segment of their delivery chain.
  • 39% say insufficient visibility is directly impacting AI success.
  • 71% don't fully trust AI in network operations.

Why the mistrust?

Because AI is only as reliable as the data you feed it, and the data today is incomplete. Public cloud paths, remote work connections, ISP transport layers, and peering networks remain black boxes, yet companies are trying to deploy AI-driven triage and AI-driven automation on top of them. It's the equivalent of asking a self-driving car to navigate with half a windshield.

Before We Talk About AI, We Need to Talk About Order

There is a simple, non-negotiable sequence for modern networking success:

1. Visibility Enables Trust

You cannot automate what you cannot see, and you cannot trust AI-driven decisions when the data behind them is partial or ambiguous. The report makes this clear in no uncertain terms: cloud-to-cloud visibility, real-time path validation, ISP metrics, and public cloud telemetry are all required. Yet only 5% of respondents say they receive the ISP data they need, underscoring a simple truth that without visibility, trust is impossible.

2. Automation Enables Scale

Once you have reliable telemetry, patterns emerge: including baselines, repeated bottlenecks, behavior over time, capacity trends and known-good configurations. These patterns form the backbone of automation. However, today, only 27% of companies have mature automation practices. A full 70% are still early to mid-stage. Why so low? Because automation depends on accuracy. And accuracy depends on visibility. Automation cannot scale when your data is fragmented, when paths are unknown, or when you're still troubleshooting ISPs manually.

Which brings us to the final step.

3. AI Enables Foresight

AI is the multiplier. AI is the prediction engine. AI is the triage assistant that cuts MTTR and solves problems before users feel them. But AI is the last step and not the first. The report's adoption numbers prove enterprises are trying to skip ahead. 92% plan to use AI-enabled network operations solutions, but only 23% have anything deployed and a full 71% don't trust AI yet.

Why not? Because AI recommendations can't be trusted until the data is complete, the telemetry is continuous, the automation workflows are consistent and the visibility is fully end-to-end. AI doesn't magically fix missing data. AI makes missing data more dangerous.

The Right Path: Visibility → Automation → AI

Every CIO and NetOps leader should use this sequence as the modernization roadmap:

Step 1 - Expand Visibility - Goal: create trustworthy data

Expanding visibility means achieving full-path insight from the user all the way to the application, across both overlay and underlay networks. It requires comprehensive coverage of cloud environments, the public internet, and ISP infrastructure, combined with real-time and historical perspectives.

Step 2 - Scale with Automation - Goal: create consistent, repeatable execution

Take the high-fidelity telemetry and build: automated troubleshooting, automated remediation, automated policy deployment and automated performance baselining.

Step 3 - Apply AI for Foresight - Goal: create proactive, intelligent operations

Once trust and scale exist, AI becomes: predictive, accurate, reliable, safe and transformative.

But again — in that order.

The CIO Takeaway

AI is not your starting point; it is the reward for doing visibility and automation right. The message from the 2026 data is not subtle: AI initiatives are outpacing the network's readiness to support them. Until visibility gaps are closed and automation matures, network teams will continue to struggle, budgets will be strained, and enterprises will underperform on AI ROI. Your network observability stack is the AI data engine, your automation layer is the AI execution engine, and your AI platform is the intelligence engine. Mixing up this order doesn't accelerate progress; it sabotages it.

Final Thoughts

If enterprises want AI to truly deliver, powering autonomous triage, proactive remediation, intelligent routing, predictive detection, and real-time optimization, then the sequence is clear: visibility enables trust, automation enables scale, AI enables foresight and the companies that follow this order will win the AI era of NetOps.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...