Skip to main content

Application Performance – A Top Priority for Businesses in 2012

Late in 2011 Quocirca conducted a research project across the USA and Europe to investigate what would be top of mind for CIOs and their management teams in 2012. We asked respondents to select their top 5 priorities from a list of 15 hot IT issues. These ranged from desktop upgrades, through various types of cloud deployment and network issues to improving the way applications are delivered.

Top of the list by a long chalk, selected by more than half the 500 respondents as a top 5 issue, was application performance management (APM). Perhaps this is not surprising; the other issues with high scores included private cloud deployment, data center virtualization, optimizing the application lifecycle, deploying new customer applications and business transaction management. All of these involve delivering more effective applications to the business, but APM is about ensuring that this goal is actually achieved.

As with any investment that a business makes, ensuring that it delivers as promised requires measurement. Ultimately IT is about delivery of the applications that enable the business, be they utilities such as email and document management systems or core applications that drive the business processes that differentiate one business from another. APM is about measuring the effectiveness of applications and therefore IT.

APM tools enable the proactive monitoring of the various factors that affect the overall performance of an application and ultimately the experience of its users. This includes the various application software layers (database, application server etc.), the network and user access environment. APM tools also provide the ability to see how performance changes through time. The output is actionable advice on how to maintain and improve application performance levels.

Consistently through the research it was CIOs (20% of the sample) who recognized the importance of these issues and expressed greatest concern about their organization’s ability to address them. That is not to say other IT managers were complacent, they were not far behind their bosses in most cases.

There was widespread recognition of the pressure to deliver better application performance, with 70% overall saying user demand will increase. CIOs were particularly worried with 80% saying that they did not have the application performance metrics well mapped to business goals and that monitoring needed to be more proactive. This latter point was consistent across the industries covered by the survey which were ecommerce, financial services, technology and a range of other commercial organizations.

The value of being able to better measure application performance and deliver measurable improvements efficiently goes beyond business and user satisfaction. One of the key aims, especially for CIOs, was to free up their staff to focus on more strategic goals rather than just fighting to keep the lights on. There was a clear willingness to invest in APM tools that delivered on promise rather than just seeking out those that cost the least.

IT managers recognize that being able to measure the performance of their applications is the only sure-fire ways of ensuring all IT investments are delivering as promised.

Related Links:

www.quocirca.com

Click here to download Quocirca’s free report 2012 – The year of Application Performance Management (APM)

The report includes a self-evaluation tool to enable readers to measure where their organization’s maturity, with regard to APM, sits.

Quocirca will be presenting the report findings at two webinars on June 28, and at a seminar in the UK on July 5, links below:

Register here for the European webinar Thursday June 28, 2012

Register here for the US webinar Thursday June 28, 2012

Register here for the UK event “APM Performance Day” July 4, 2012

Bob Tarzey

Bob Tarzey has been an analyst with Quocirca since 2002. His main area of coverage is route to market for ITC vendors, but he also has an additional focus on IT security, network computing, systems management and managed services. Tarzey writes regular analytical columns for Computing, Computer Weekly, silicon.com and Computer Reseller News (CRN), and has written for The Times, Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph. Bob blogs for Computing, Info Security Advisor and IT-Director.com. He also provides general comment for the European IT and business press.

Bob has extensive knowledge of the IT industry. Prior to joining Quocirca, he spent 16 years working for US technology vendors including DEC (now HP), Sybase, Gupta, Merant (now Serena), eGain and webMethods (now Software AG).

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Application Performance – A Top Priority for Businesses in 2012

Late in 2011 Quocirca conducted a research project across the USA and Europe to investigate what would be top of mind for CIOs and their management teams in 2012. We asked respondents to select their top 5 priorities from a list of 15 hot IT issues. These ranged from desktop upgrades, through various types of cloud deployment and network issues to improving the way applications are delivered.

Top of the list by a long chalk, selected by more than half the 500 respondents as a top 5 issue, was application performance management (APM). Perhaps this is not surprising; the other issues with high scores included private cloud deployment, data center virtualization, optimizing the application lifecycle, deploying new customer applications and business transaction management. All of these involve delivering more effective applications to the business, but APM is about ensuring that this goal is actually achieved.

As with any investment that a business makes, ensuring that it delivers as promised requires measurement. Ultimately IT is about delivery of the applications that enable the business, be they utilities such as email and document management systems or core applications that drive the business processes that differentiate one business from another. APM is about measuring the effectiveness of applications and therefore IT.

APM tools enable the proactive monitoring of the various factors that affect the overall performance of an application and ultimately the experience of its users. This includes the various application software layers (database, application server etc.), the network and user access environment. APM tools also provide the ability to see how performance changes through time. The output is actionable advice on how to maintain and improve application performance levels.

Consistently through the research it was CIOs (20% of the sample) who recognized the importance of these issues and expressed greatest concern about their organization’s ability to address them. That is not to say other IT managers were complacent, they were not far behind their bosses in most cases.

There was widespread recognition of the pressure to deliver better application performance, with 70% overall saying user demand will increase. CIOs were particularly worried with 80% saying that they did not have the application performance metrics well mapped to business goals and that monitoring needed to be more proactive. This latter point was consistent across the industries covered by the survey which were ecommerce, financial services, technology and a range of other commercial organizations.

The value of being able to better measure application performance and deliver measurable improvements efficiently goes beyond business and user satisfaction. One of the key aims, especially for CIOs, was to free up their staff to focus on more strategic goals rather than just fighting to keep the lights on. There was a clear willingness to invest in APM tools that delivered on promise rather than just seeking out those that cost the least.

IT managers recognize that being able to measure the performance of their applications is the only sure-fire ways of ensuring all IT investments are delivering as promised.

Related Links:

www.quocirca.com

Click here to download Quocirca’s free report 2012 – The year of Application Performance Management (APM)

The report includes a self-evaluation tool to enable readers to measure where their organization’s maturity, with regard to APM, sits.

Quocirca will be presenting the report findings at two webinars on June 28, and at a seminar in the UK on July 5, links below:

Register here for the European webinar Thursday June 28, 2012

Register here for the US webinar Thursday June 28, 2012

Register here for the UK event “APM Performance Day” July 4, 2012

Bob Tarzey

Bob Tarzey has been an analyst with Quocirca since 2002. His main area of coverage is route to market for ITC vendors, but he also has an additional focus on IT security, network computing, systems management and managed services. Tarzey writes regular analytical columns for Computing, Computer Weekly, silicon.com and Computer Reseller News (CRN), and has written for The Times, Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph. Bob blogs for Computing, Info Security Advisor and IT-Director.com. He also provides general comment for the European IT and business press.

Bob has extensive knowledge of the IT industry. Prior to joining Quocirca, he spent 16 years working for US technology vendors including DEC (now HP), Sybase, Gupta, Merant (now Serena), eGain and webMethods (now Software AG).

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...