Skip to main content

Are Retail Websites Meeting Shopper Expectations?

90% Of Consumers Will Leave A Site If It Does Not Load Quickly

Shoppers won’t wait for retailers, according to a new research report titled, 2019 Retailer Website Performance Evaluation: Are Retail Websites Meeting Shopper Expectations? from Yottaa.

This year’s report clearly demonstrates that consumers will not only abandon an eCommerce site merely because it’s slow, but they will also take definitive actions after leaving the site, such as buying from a competing retailer, complaining on social media, or worse, never returning to the brand.

“Every year RSR’s report on eCommerce site performance evaluates retailers based on their website speed and shopping experience. But we never actually asked shoppers what they think about it,” said Steve Rowen, Managing Partner, Retail Systems Research (RSR). “This year we surveyed over 1,000 shoppers on the topic and found that 90% of consumers will abandon a shopping session just because it is slow. And when they get frustrated by a slow site, shoppers’ actions are damaging to a retailer in every possible way: they leave, they buy from a competitor, and they likely won’t be coming back to the site.”

Survey results:

■ 90% have left an eCommerce site because it did not load in the time expected

■ 57% have left a slow eCommerce site and then bought from a similar retailer

■ 53% stated the biggest issue they had with slow retail sites is that they are wasting their personal time

■ 40% have left an eCommerce site because it is slow and then bought from Amazon

■ 23% never returned to a brand’s website due to slow page performance

■ 22% were concerned that a slow retail site might lead to a security risk of their personal information

■ 14% have taken to social media to complain about a slow loading retail site

Average Retailer Scores Are Still Too Low

Even in removing some of the subjective scoring from its criteria, RSR found retailers’ scores are too low (47%) . With the highest score in the class at 68%, something is very wrong. And as RSR’s consumer data demonstrated, shoppers are not willing to grade on a curve – they want to act now, and they are more than willing to leave for someone who can provide that.

Third Party Requests Are STILL Slowing Down Sites

Consumers are clear that they want rich functionality built into both the desktop AND the mobile site. In fact, when asked to identify the top 2 online features that make shopping online most enjoyable, product ratings/reviews and the ability to compare similar products top the list.

However, RSR’s results also show that retailers’ sites just aren’t fast enough and this is largely due to heavy pages from 3rd party technologies. This is consistent across home pages and product detail pages, mobile and desktop. In fact, only a handful of retailers scored maximum points in the “percent of load time from 3rd parties” category.

Methodology: The research, which was conducted by Retail Systems Research (RSR), evaluates 80 major retail websites on page speed performance and shopper experience, and includes survey results from 1,300 consumers to provide their perspective on eCommerce site performance. Retailers evaluated in this year’s report include: American Eagle Outfitters, Bed Bath & Beyond, Crate & Barrel, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Express, Levi Strauss, Pier 1, Ralph Lauren, Tory Burch, Ulta Beauty, and 70 more. RSR, an industry market intelligence firm that helps retailers make more strategic decisions about the role of information technology in their enterprise, conducted the study from April to May of 2019. In keeping with the methodology used in its previous two reports on this topic, RSR assembled a list of 80 top retail sites, and then tested the speed at which each retailers’ desktop and mobile sites loaded, evaluated the ease with which a shopper could shop their channels, and analyzed what 3rd party technologies (product reviews, recommendations, personalization, chat features, etc.) were provided to improve the shopper’s journey and increase online sales. The retailers were then ranked from 1 to 80 based on the collected data. In order to provide a broader look at eCommerce site performance, in this year’s report RSR expanded the scope of its research to include consumers’ opinions through interviews with 1,300 US-based shoppers.

The Latest

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

Are Retail Websites Meeting Shopper Expectations?

90% Of Consumers Will Leave A Site If It Does Not Load Quickly

Shoppers won’t wait for retailers, according to a new research report titled, 2019 Retailer Website Performance Evaluation: Are Retail Websites Meeting Shopper Expectations? from Yottaa.

This year’s report clearly demonstrates that consumers will not only abandon an eCommerce site merely because it’s slow, but they will also take definitive actions after leaving the site, such as buying from a competing retailer, complaining on social media, or worse, never returning to the brand.

“Every year RSR’s report on eCommerce site performance evaluates retailers based on their website speed and shopping experience. But we never actually asked shoppers what they think about it,” said Steve Rowen, Managing Partner, Retail Systems Research (RSR). “This year we surveyed over 1,000 shoppers on the topic and found that 90% of consumers will abandon a shopping session just because it is slow. And when they get frustrated by a slow site, shoppers’ actions are damaging to a retailer in every possible way: they leave, they buy from a competitor, and they likely won’t be coming back to the site.”

Survey results:

■ 90% have left an eCommerce site because it did not load in the time expected

■ 57% have left a slow eCommerce site and then bought from a similar retailer

■ 53% stated the biggest issue they had with slow retail sites is that they are wasting their personal time

■ 40% have left an eCommerce site because it is slow and then bought from Amazon

■ 23% never returned to a brand’s website due to slow page performance

■ 22% were concerned that a slow retail site might lead to a security risk of their personal information

■ 14% have taken to social media to complain about a slow loading retail site

Average Retailer Scores Are Still Too Low

Even in removing some of the subjective scoring from its criteria, RSR found retailers’ scores are too low (47%) . With the highest score in the class at 68%, something is very wrong. And as RSR’s consumer data demonstrated, shoppers are not willing to grade on a curve – they want to act now, and they are more than willing to leave for someone who can provide that.

Third Party Requests Are STILL Slowing Down Sites

Consumers are clear that they want rich functionality built into both the desktop AND the mobile site. In fact, when asked to identify the top 2 online features that make shopping online most enjoyable, product ratings/reviews and the ability to compare similar products top the list.

However, RSR’s results also show that retailers’ sites just aren’t fast enough and this is largely due to heavy pages from 3rd party technologies. This is consistent across home pages and product detail pages, mobile and desktop. In fact, only a handful of retailers scored maximum points in the “percent of load time from 3rd parties” category.

Methodology: The research, which was conducted by Retail Systems Research (RSR), evaluates 80 major retail websites on page speed performance and shopper experience, and includes survey results from 1,300 consumers to provide their perspective on eCommerce site performance. Retailers evaluated in this year’s report include: American Eagle Outfitters, Bed Bath & Beyond, Crate & Barrel, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Express, Levi Strauss, Pier 1, Ralph Lauren, Tory Burch, Ulta Beauty, and 70 more. RSR, an industry market intelligence firm that helps retailers make more strategic decisions about the role of information technology in their enterprise, conducted the study from April to May of 2019. In keeping with the methodology used in its previous two reports on this topic, RSR assembled a list of 80 top retail sites, and then tested the speed at which each retailers’ desktop and mobile sites loaded, evaluated the ease with which a shopper could shop their channels, and analyzed what 3rd party technologies (product reviews, recommendations, personalization, chat features, etc.) were provided to improve the shopper’s journey and increase online sales. The retailers were then ranked from 1 to 80 based on the collected data. In order to provide a broader look at eCommerce site performance, in this year’s report RSR expanded the scope of its research to include consumers’ opinions through interviews with 1,300 US-based shoppers.

The Latest

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...