Shoppers won’t wait for retailers, according to a new research report titled, 2019 Retailer Website Performance Evaluation: Are Retail Websites Meeting Shopper Expectations? from Yottaa.
This year’s report clearly demonstrates that consumers will not only abandon an eCommerce site merely because it’s slow, but they will also take definitive actions after leaving the site, such as buying from a competing retailer, complaining on social media, or worse, never returning to the brand.
“Every year RSR’s report on eCommerce site performance evaluates retailers based on their website speed and shopping experience. But we never actually asked shoppers what they think about it,” said Steve Rowen, Managing Partner, Retail Systems Research (RSR). “This year we surveyed over 1,000 shoppers on the topic and found that 90% of consumers will abandon a shopping session just because it is slow. And when they get frustrated by a slow site, shoppers’ actions are damaging to a retailer in every possible way: they leave, they buy from a competitor, and they likely won’t be coming back to the site.”
■ 90% have left an eCommerce site because it did not load in the time expected
■ 57% have left a slow eCommerce site and then bought from a similar retailer
■ 53% stated the biggest issue they had with slow retail sites is that they are wasting their personal time
■ 40% have left an eCommerce site because it is slow and then bought from Amazon
■ 23% never returned to a brand’s website due to slow page performance
■ 22% were concerned that a slow retail site might lead to a security risk of their personal information
■ 14% have taken to social media to complain about a slow loading retail site
Average Retailer Scores Are Still Too Low
Even in removing some of the subjective scoring from its criteria, RSR found retailers’ scores are too low (47%) . With the highest score in the class at 68%, something is very wrong. And as RSR’s consumer data demonstrated, shoppers are not willing to grade on a curve – they want to act now, and they are more than willing to leave for someone who can provide that.
Third Party Requests Are STILL Slowing Down Sites
Consumers are clear that they want rich functionality built into both the desktop AND the mobile site. In fact, when asked to identify the top 2 online features that make shopping online most enjoyable, product ratings/reviews and the ability to compare similar products top the list.
However, RSR’s results also show that retailers’ sites just aren’t fast enough and this is largely due to heavy pages from 3rd party technologies. This is consistent across home pages and product detail pages, mobile and desktop. In fact, only a handful of retailers scored maximum points in the “percent of load time from 3rd parties” category.
Methodology: The research, which was conducted by Retail Systems Research (RSR), evaluates 80 major retail websites on page speed performance and shopper experience, and includes survey results from 1,300 consumers to provide their perspective on eCommerce site performance. Retailers evaluated in this year’s report include: American Eagle Outfitters, Bed Bath & Beyond, Crate & Barrel, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Express, Levi Strauss, Pier 1, Ralph Lauren, Tory Burch, Ulta Beauty, and 70 more. RSR, an industry market intelligence firm that helps retailers make more strategic decisions about the role of information technology in their enterprise, conducted the study from April to May of 2019. In keeping with the methodology used in its previous two reports on this topic, RSR assembled a list of 80 top retail sites, and then tested the speed at which each retailers’ desktop and mobile sites loaded, evaluated the ease with which a shopper could shop their channels, and analyzed what 3rd party technologies (product reviews, recommendations, personalization, chat features, etc.) were provided to improve the shopper’s journey and increase online sales. The retailers were then ranked from 1 to 80 based on the collected data. In order to provide a broader look at eCommerce site performance, in this year’s report RSR expanded the scope of its research to include consumers’ opinions through interviews with 1,300 US-based shoppers.
Generative AI has recently experienced unprecedented dramatic growth, making it one of the most exciting transformations the tech industry has seen in some time. However, this growth also poses a challenge for tech leaders who will be expected to deliver on the promise of new technology. In 2024, delivering tangible outcomes that meet the potential of AI, and setting up incubator projects for the future will be key tasks ...
SAP is a tool for automating business processes. Managing SAP solutions, especially with the shift to the cloud-based S/4HANA platform, can be intricate. To explore the concerns of SAP users during operational transformations and automation, a survey was conducted in mid-2023 by Digitate and Americas' SAP Users' Group ...
Some companies are just starting to dip their toes into developing AI capabilities, while (few) others can claim they have built a truly AI-first product. Regardless of where a company is on the AI journey, leaders must understand what it means to build every aspect of their product with AI in mind ...
Generative AI will usher in advantages within various industries. However, the technology is still nascent, and according to the recent Dynatrace survey there are many challenges and risks that organizations need to overcome to use this technology effectively ...
In today's digital era, monitoring and observability are indispensable in software and application development. Their efficacy lies in empowering developers to swiftly identify and address issues, enhance performance, and deliver flawless user experiences. Achieving these objectives requires meticulous planning, strategic implementation, and consistent ongoing maintenance. In this blog, we're sharing our five best practices to fortify your approach to application performance monitoring (APM) and observability ...