Immutable by Design: Reinventing Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Anthony Cusimano
Object First

In today's digital landscape, AI, quantum computing, IoT, and other emerging technologies are rapidly evolving the value of data and its impact on business continuity and ROI. These technologies are creating an abundance of data that has to be managed, stored, and protected. This means that strong data management and maturity must be prioritized for companies to stay competitive, as the security of this data is imperative to mitigate operational and logistical downtime.

Datto is sounding the alarm for businesses to reevaluate their business continuity and disaster recovery plans with their 2025 The State of BCDR report, calling for companies to future-proof their data protection strategies. Businesses that face downtime or outages risk financial and reputational damage, as well as reducing partner, shareholder, and customer trust. One of the major challenges that enterprises face is implementing a robust business continuity plan.

What's the solution?

The answer may lie in disaster recovery tactics such as truly immutable storage and regular disaster recovery testing.

Future-Proofing Business: Strategic Storage Investments

There are two main ingredients needed to perfect disaster recovery and business continuity: immutable storage and regular recovery testing to prove the effectiveness of runbooks and disaster recovery plans. The combination of these two will ensure a robust disaster recovery plan that not only provides tighter security and lower recovery costs and downtime but also ensures loyalty among customers, regulatory compliance, and peace of mind. This may be the only way to ensure quick resolutions after an attack or a catastrophic incident.

With cyberattacks targeting backup data in 93% of cases, immutable backups are a must-have for any robust business continuity Plan (BCP). Immutable backups create tamper-proof copies of data, protecting it from cyber threats, accidental deletion, and corruption. This guarantees that critical data can be quickly restored, allowing businesses to recover swiftly from disruptions. Immutable storage provides data copies that cannot be manipulated or altered, ensuring data remains secure and can quickly be recovered from an attack.

In addition to immutable backup storage, response plans must be continually tested and updated to combat the evolving threat landscape and adapt to growing business needs. The ultimate test of a response plan ensures data can be quickly and easily restored or failed over, depending on the event. Activating a second site in the case of a natural disaster or recovering systems without making any ransomware payments in the case of an attack. This testing involves validating the reliability of backup systems, recovery procedures, and the overall disaster recovery plan to minimize downtime and ensure business continuity.

So why are so many organizations struggling to implement these technologies and tactics?

Write Once, Regret Never: Solving Immutable Storage Challenges

Several factors could contribute to the lack of adoption of Immutable storage: budget restraints, compliance and regulation, and false vendor claims. In this volatile market, enterprises may not be able to increase their storage and data recovery budget, mistakenly putting immutable storage on the back burner. However, prioritizing immutable storage will save businesses from huge financial losses when attacked by a bad actor or face data loss and workflow disruptions.

The data compliance landscape is robust, and regulation should be a priority for all business leaders. They may overlook advanced storage solutions for fear of not meeting compliance and regulation requirements. However, immutable storage should be built around the latest Zero Trust and data security principles, which assume that individuals, devices, and services attempting to access company resources are compromised and should not be trusted, thus meeting regulatory compliance such as the European NIS2 directive.

It can be challenging for IT teams trying to determine the perfect fit for their ecosystem, as many storage vendors claim to provide immutable storage but are missing key features. As a rule of thumb, if "immutable" data can be overwritten by a backup or storage admin, a vendor, or an attacker, then it is not a truly immutable storage solution. The only way to truly evaluate if immutable storage providers are selling truly immutable solutions is to follow the five immutable requirements.

S3 object storage or a fully documented, open standard with native immutability that enables independent penetration testing is imperative. Backup data must be immutable the moment it is written and cannot be modified, deleted, or reset by any administrator, internal or external. Backup software and backup storage must be physically isolated to prevent compromised credentials from being used to alter or destroy data, and to provide resilience against other disasters. Lastly, a dedicated hardware appliance must be used to isolate immutable storage from virtualized attack surfaces, removing all risks during setup, updates, and maintenance.

Navigating the Challenges of Disaster Recovery Testing for Immutable Storage

CIOs typically prioritize protection and prevention rather than modernizing recovery. This is partly due to concerns over talent shortages and time restraints, as well as a lack of awareness of the benefits of these tests. It's true that notifications and alert fatigue overrun many cybersecurity teams, and they may feel that they do not have enough time to run these tests while also monitoring and securing the network. However, testing will limit the time it will take to respond and defend against an attack, while saving time across the company.

Additionally, some CIOs may not be fully aware of the benefits that disaster recovery testing provides and the importance of testing immutable backup storage to prevent data loss from a slew of security incidents. They may fall victim to underestimating the risks associated with failing to run these tests. Still, the risks of not having a robust business continuity disaster recovery plan could be fatal.

As data continues to grow in value and volume, businesses must prioritize their security and recovery. By adding regular testing to their recovery platforms and solutions, organizations are more likely to recover quicker and have less operational downtime. Embracing truly immutable storage and conducting regular disaster recovery tests to ensure their effectiveness is crucial for business continuity plans.

Anthony Cusimano is Solutions Director at Object First

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Keys to Building a Partner Ecosystem That Scales

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

Immutable by Design: Reinventing Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Anthony Cusimano
Object First

In today's digital landscape, AI, quantum computing, IoT, and other emerging technologies are rapidly evolving the value of data and its impact on business continuity and ROI. These technologies are creating an abundance of data that has to be managed, stored, and protected. This means that strong data management and maturity must be prioritized for companies to stay competitive, as the security of this data is imperative to mitigate operational and logistical downtime.

Datto is sounding the alarm for businesses to reevaluate their business continuity and disaster recovery plans with their 2025 The State of BCDR report, calling for companies to future-proof their data protection strategies. Businesses that face downtime or outages risk financial and reputational damage, as well as reducing partner, shareholder, and customer trust. One of the major challenges that enterprises face is implementing a robust business continuity plan.

What's the solution?

The answer may lie in disaster recovery tactics such as truly immutable storage and regular disaster recovery testing.

Future-Proofing Business: Strategic Storage Investments

There are two main ingredients needed to perfect disaster recovery and business continuity: immutable storage and regular recovery testing to prove the effectiveness of runbooks and disaster recovery plans. The combination of these two will ensure a robust disaster recovery plan that not only provides tighter security and lower recovery costs and downtime but also ensures loyalty among customers, regulatory compliance, and peace of mind. This may be the only way to ensure quick resolutions after an attack or a catastrophic incident.

With cyberattacks targeting backup data in 93% of cases, immutable backups are a must-have for any robust business continuity Plan (BCP). Immutable backups create tamper-proof copies of data, protecting it from cyber threats, accidental deletion, and corruption. This guarantees that critical data can be quickly restored, allowing businesses to recover swiftly from disruptions. Immutable storage provides data copies that cannot be manipulated or altered, ensuring data remains secure and can quickly be recovered from an attack.

In addition to immutable backup storage, response plans must be continually tested and updated to combat the evolving threat landscape and adapt to growing business needs. The ultimate test of a response plan ensures data can be quickly and easily restored or failed over, depending on the event. Activating a second site in the case of a natural disaster or recovering systems without making any ransomware payments in the case of an attack. This testing involves validating the reliability of backup systems, recovery procedures, and the overall disaster recovery plan to minimize downtime and ensure business continuity.

So why are so many organizations struggling to implement these technologies and tactics?

Write Once, Regret Never: Solving Immutable Storage Challenges

Several factors could contribute to the lack of adoption of Immutable storage: budget restraints, compliance and regulation, and false vendor claims. In this volatile market, enterprises may not be able to increase their storage and data recovery budget, mistakenly putting immutable storage on the back burner. However, prioritizing immutable storage will save businesses from huge financial losses when attacked by a bad actor or face data loss and workflow disruptions.

The data compliance landscape is robust, and regulation should be a priority for all business leaders. They may overlook advanced storage solutions for fear of not meeting compliance and regulation requirements. However, immutable storage should be built around the latest Zero Trust and data security principles, which assume that individuals, devices, and services attempting to access company resources are compromised and should not be trusted, thus meeting regulatory compliance such as the European NIS2 directive.

It can be challenging for IT teams trying to determine the perfect fit for their ecosystem, as many storage vendors claim to provide immutable storage but are missing key features. As a rule of thumb, if "immutable" data can be overwritten by a backup or storage admin, a vendor, or an attacker, then it is not a truly immutable storage solution. The only way to truly evaluate if immutable storage providers are selling truly immutable solutions is to follow the five immutable requirements.

S3 object storage or a fully documented, open standard with native immutability that enables independent penetration testing is imperative. Backup data must be immutable the moment it is written and cannot be modified, deleted, or reset by any administrator, internal or external. Backup software and backup storage must be physically isolated to prevent compromised credentials from being used to alter or destroy data, and to provide resilience against other disasters. Lastly, a dedicated hardware appliance must be used to isolate immutable storage from virtualized attack surfaces, removing all risks during setup, updates, and maintenance.

Navigating the Challenges of Disaster Recovery Testing for Immutable Storage

CIOs typically prioritize protection and prevention rather than modernizing recovery. This is partly due to concerns over talent shortages and time restraints, as well as a lack of awareness of the benefits of these tests. It's true that notifications and alert fatigue overrun many cybersecurity teams, and they may feel that they do not have enough time to run these tests while also monitoring and securing the network. However, testing will limit the time it will take to respond and defend against an attack, while saving time across the company.

Additionally, some CIOs may not be fully aware of the benefits that disaster recovery testing provides and the importance of testing immutable backup storage to prevent data loss from a slew of security incidents. They may fall victim to underestimating the risks associated with failing to run these tests. Still, the risks of not having a robust business continuity disaster recovery plan could be fatal.

As data continues to grow in value and volume, businesses must prioritize their security and recovery. By adding regular testing to their recovery platforms and solutions, organizations are more likely to recover quicker and have less operational downtime. Embracing truly immutable storage and conducting regular disaster recovery tests to ensure their effectiveness is crucial for business continuity plans.

Anthony Cusimano is Solutions Director at Object First

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Keys to Building a Partner Ecosystem That Scales

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...