Are You Happy with Your Cloud Service Provider?

Nearly 80% of IT Professionals Say NO
Michael Masterson
Learn more about Dynatrace

Imagine a well-regarded car dealership trying to sell you a car with a warranty that only covers malfunctions associated with the warning lights you can see on the dashboard – while other issues remain unseen and will not be part of the protection you receive as a buyer. Seems reasonable? No. And that’s exactly what many businesses are saying about the service-level agreements (SLAs) they are getting from cloud providers today.

A recent study with 740 senior IT professionals conducted by independent research and consulting firm Research In Action revealed that the vast majority of CIOs are dissatisfied with their cloud SLAs, feeling they are too simplistic, provide poor visibility, and don’t account for true business risks. This comes to light as APM (Application Performance Management) is increasingly regarded as a crucial tool for empowering businesses to have deep, 24x7 visibility into the performance of their applications across the entire network infrastructure from the server to each and every end-user click, and back.


A business’ bottom line depends on meeting and exceeding expectations for every single customer, 24x7. So, entrusting mission-critical business applications to a cloud provider requires them to deliver total visibility and accountability in order to earn trust. The core problem however, is that a typical cloud SLA is little more than an availability guarantee, focused primarily on specifications rather than service.

Entrusting mission-critical business applications that drive revenue and critical business processes require ultimate trust and accountability in a cloud provider. Metrics like simple uptime do not capture well-known issues such as "noisy neighbors", which can be detrimental to traditional enterprise apps that were not designed to scale and fail horizontally. APM is no longer optional; and as customers bet on the cloud, they must demand granular SLA assurances around performance and rapid problem resolution.

Many survey respondents feel these SLAs are generally not built around the provider giving their customers the promise of visibility or a consistently strong end-user experience. So for an organization counting on cloud performance for the success of mission-critical business process, getting nothing more from their cloud provider than vanity metrics is understandably frustrating.


Predictably, 79% of those surveyed believe typical SLAs are far too basic and fail to address the dangers of moving to and managing applications in the cloud, while 63% of respondents indicated there is a need for more meaningful SLA metrics geared towards ensuring the continuous delivery of a high quality end-user experience. But it gets worse: Nearly three quarters (73%) of businesses believe their cloud providers could be hiding problems, either at an infrastructure or platform-level, that have an impact on application performance. And perhaps most surprisingly, 60% of respondents expressed further anxiety that other, co-located tenants (aka noisy neighbors) consuming difficult to partition resources could impact their own workload performance.

From a business perspective, it’s not enough for an application to simply function. It has to perform well no matter what demand surges or market changes throw at it. Performance is everything, and if an application is not delivering, then businesses need to know that, and understand the reason immediately.

A cloud provider giving you an SLA that provides little more than assurance that “the cloud will be working nearly all the time” and making no mention of meaningful detailed metrics (“will my customers have a reliably great experience, and their needs be fulfilled by the applications they rely upon in my site?”) is under-delivering at best. It’s like a major airline’s pilot announcing proudly “we’re 99.5% sure the plane will get there eventually.” Is anyone getting on that plane? Of course not, so why would you stake your business on an SLA with a similar promise?

It’s no surprise that 75% of IT professionals fear that the loss of control could prevent them from fully optimizing their applications and reduce their return on investment from the cloud. Their fears are well founded. Performance drives ROI and their cloud providers are doing nothing to guarantee performance.

Moreover, 62% of businesses claim that they find it harder to troubleshoot problems in the cloud, and if you can’t troubleshoot, how exactly are you supposed to optimize end-user experience? After all, knowing you have a problem is the first step towards solving it.

According to the survey, executives in the IT world are dissatisfied with their cloud SLAs, and those who aren’t probably should be, because a typical SLA guarantees very little in reality. As a business, you want an application that will consistently perform above and beyond the expectations of your customers. But if all you get out of your cloud provider’s SLA is a promise that basic functionality will happen nearly all of the time, without addressing crucial specifics and caveats that directly impact your business success – it’s just not enough.

What’s the bottom line? Visibility and control (such as that provided by APM) is no longer optional; accordingly, as customers move to the cloud they must demand granular SLA assurances around performance and rapid problem resolution.

Michael Masterson is Director of Cloud Strategy, Compuware APM.

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

Keys to Building a Partner Ecosystem That Scales

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

Are You Happy with Your Cloud Service Provider?

Nearly 80% of IT Professionals Say NO
Michael Masterson
Learn more about Dynatrace

Imagine a well-regarded car dealership trying to sell you a car with a warranty that only covers malfunctions associated with the warning lights you can see on the dashboard – while other issues remain unseen and will not be part of the protection you receive as a buyer. Seems reasonable? No. And that’s exactly what many businesses are saying about the service-level agreements (SLAs) they are getting from cloud providers today.

A recent study with 740 senior IT professionals conducted by independent research and consulting firm Research In Action revealed that the vast majority of CIOs are dissatisfied with their cloud SLAs, feeling they are too simplistic, provide poor visibility, and don’t account for true business risks. This comes to light as APM (Application Performance Management) is increasingly regarded as a crucial tool for empowering businesses to have deep, 24x7 visibility into the performance of their applications across the entire network infrastructure from the server to each and every end-user click, and back.


A business’ bottom line depends on meeting and exceeding expectations for every single customer, 24x7. So, entrusting mission-critical business applications to a cloud provider requires them to deliver total visibility and accountability in order to earn trust. The core problem however, is that a typical cloud SLA is little more than an availability guarantee, focused primarily on specifications rather than service.

Entrusting mission-critical business applications that drive revenue and critical business processes require ultimate trust and accountability in a cloud provider. Metrics like simple uptime do not capture well-known issues such as "noisy neighbors", which can be detrimental to traditional enterprise apps that were not designed to scale and fail horizontally. APM is no longer optional; and as customers bet on the cloud, they must demand granular SLA assurances around performance and rapid problem resolution.

Many survey respondents feel these SLAs are generally not built around the provider giving their customers the promise of visibility or a consistently strong end-user experience. So for an organization counting on cloud performance for the success of mission-critical business process, getting nothing more from their cloud provider than vanity metrics is understandably frustrating.


Predictably, 79% of those surveyed believe typical SLAs are far too basic and fail to address the dangers of moving to and managing applications in the cloud, while 63% of respondents indicated there is a need for more meaningful SLA metrics geared towards ensuring the continuous delivery of a high quality end-user experience. But it gets worse: Nearly three quarters (73%) of businesses believe their cloud providers could be hiding problems, either at an infrastructure or platform-level, that have an impact on application performance. And perhaps most surprisingly, 60% of respondents expressed further anxiety that other, co-located tenants (aka noisy neighbors) consuming difficult to partition resources could impact their own workload performance.

From a business perspective, it’s not enough for an application to simply function. It has to perform well no matter what demand surges or market changes throw at it. Performance is everything, and if an application is not delivering, then businesses need to know that, and understand the reason immediately.

A cloud provider giving you an SLA that provides little more than assurance that “the cloud will be working nearly all the time” and making no mention of meaningful detailed metrics (“will my customers have a reliably great experience, and their needs be fulfilled by the applications they rely upon in my site?”) is under-delivering at best. It’s like a major airline’s pilot announcing proudly “we’re 99.5% sure the plane will get there eventually.” Is anyone getting on that plane? Of course not, so why would you stake your business on an SLA with a similar promise?

It’s no surprise that 75% of IT professionals fear that the loss of control could prevent them from fully optimizing their applications and reduce their return on investment from the cloud. Their fears are well founded. Performance drives ROI and their cloud providers are doing nothing to guarantee performance.

Moreover, 62% of businesses claim that they find it harder to troubleshoot problems in the cloud, and if you can’t troubleshoot, how exactly are you supposed to optimize end-user experience? After all, knowing you have a problem is the first step towards solving it.

According to the survey, executives in the IT world are dissatisfied with their cloud SLAs, and those who aren’t probably should be, because a typical SLA guarantees very little in reality. As a business, you want an application that will consistently perform above and beyond the expectations of your customers. But if all you get out of your cloud provider’s SLA is a promise that basic functionality will happen nearly all of the time, without addressing crucial specifics and caveats that directly impact your business success – it’s just not enough.

What’s the bottom line? Visibility and control (such as that provided by APM) is no longer optional; accordingly, as customers move to the cloud they must demand granular SLA assurances around performance and rapid problem resolution.

Michael Masterson is Director of Cloud Strategy, Compuware APM.

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

Keys to Building a Partner Ecosystem That Scales

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...