Skip to main content

Care About Performance? Ask Yourself These 4 Questions About Security and Digitization

Don Boxley

Every IT administrator cares about performance, whether you specialize in application performance management (APM), digital performance management, or general business service/IT service management. Security is also part and parcel of APM, as without an effective security strategy, high performance becomes impossible (and frankly, irrelevant), taking a backseat to trying to protect and secure sensitive data.

Performance is also critical to digital transformation, and as companies continue their journey toward digital transformation, securing your data must be top of mind. This is true not just for your own organization, but for any third party vendors that require access to your cloud-based data. Strategic partners can be your secret weapon in application performance — but they can also morph into your worst nightmare if they are your weakest link when it comes to data sharing security.
 
Before you can properly focus on performance, therefore, you need to ensure that your ducks are in a row when it comes to your strategy for digitization, data security, and third-party partners. Begin by asking yourself the following four questions:

1. If we don't want remote users on our company's network, how can we still grant them access to the services they need to conduct business for us?

When you remove all remote users from the corporate network, you solve two typical avenues for hackers to get at your data: access controls and broken authentication. But while solving one problem, a no-access policy for your vendors means that they can't conduct business digitally for you, which certainly puts a damper on your efforts toward digital transformation.

You need to both secure your attack surface and also address the needs of your digital business. The answer to this dual-pronged challenge is to take an SDP (software defined perimeter) approach, which allows business continuity while protecting how much surface area gets exposed to lateral attacks.

2. Are we still relying on outdated VPN technology for our security strategy when it comes to giving our partners access to our network?

In light of the ongoing success that cybercriminals are having in breaching data from companies of all types and sizes, few organizations today would quibble with the fact that a reliable data security strategy is important. But some enterprises are still behind the times when it comes to knowing how best to secure their critical data in the current hack-centric environment. If it has been a while since you've taken the time to review how you're managing the access that you allow to your partners and remote users, move this task to the top of your to-do list. After all, when you read the news stories about how companies lost their data, many breaches get traced back to third parties who either intentionally or inadvertently compromised the data.

I'm just going to be blunt here — if you're still using a VPN (virtual private network) then your data isn't safe. Granted, VPNs used to be a secure solution — perhaps the most secure one — back in the days before the cloud. But physical servers are no longer king, and neither are VPNs or direct-link formats. Instead, in a new world where you're much more likely to see multi-cloud and hybrid deployments, or mixed environments of on-premise and cloud, companies need a security strategy that is designed specifically for these settings. This brings us back to SDP. This secure networking software allows IT to define which services that third-party vendors and other remote users can access in your network.

3. Does your remote access approach leave you with only a single router?

One of the disadvantages of VPNs is that they involve many complexities in configuration. They require a single router, which can boost the chance of data being compromised. A more effective way to handle third-party remote access is supporting a router environment that's heterogeneous, rather than relying only on one dedicated router.

There's another reason why you should avoid the single-router approach: you can avoid the common scenario of lock-in by a router vendor. An SDP solution allows for scaling across a multi-partner environment, moving your operations from cloud to cloud if needed.
 

4. What about application segmentation?

For optimum application performance as well as security, you need your remote-access approach to give network administrators the power for application-level segmentation (rather than network-level). To minimize the likelihood of a lateral attack on your network, you'll want to ensure that third-party partners can access your system only at the application level. By allowing more detailed control of access, vendors that you choose can only access specific services, not your entire system.

You may trust your partner's performance — but in a hybrid and multicloud environment, security concerns around partner data access can make application performance a moot point if you don't manage remote access correctly. A simple decision to modernize your approach to remote access can help ensure the data protection you need with third parties, so that application performance has a chance to shine.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

Care About Performance? Ask Yourself These 4 Questions About Security and Digitization

Don Boxley

Every IT administrator cares about performance, whether you specialize in application performance management (APM), digital performance management, or general business service/IT service management. Security is also part and parcel of APM, as without an effective security strategy, high performance becomes impossible (and frankly, irrelevant), taking a backseat to trying to protect and secure sensitive data.

Performance is also critical to digital transformation, and as companies continue their journey toward digital transformation, securing your data must be top of mind. This is true not just for your own organization, but for any third party vendors that require access to your cloud-based data. Strategic partners can be your secret weapon in application performance — but they can also morph into your worst nightmare if they are your weakest link when it comes to data sharing security.
 
Before you can properly focus on performance, therefore, you need to ensure that your ducks are in a row when it comes to your strategy for digitization, data security, and third-party partners. Begin by asking yourself the following four questions:

1. If we don't want remote users on our company's network, how can we still grant them access to the services they need to conduct business for us?

When you remove all remote users from the corporate network, you solve two typical avenues for hackers to get at your data: access controls and broken authentication. But while solving one problem, a no-access policy for your vendors means that they can't conduct business digitally for you, which certainly puts a damper on your efforts toward digital transformation.

You need to both secure your attack surface and also address the needs of your digital business. The answer to this dual-pronged challenge is to take an SDP (software defined perimeter) approach, which allows business continuity while protecting how much surface area gets exposed to lateral attacks.

2. Are we still relying on outdated VPN technology for our security strategy when it comes to giving our partners access to our network?

In light of the ongoing success that cybercriminals are having in breaching data from companies of all types and sizes, few organizations today would quibble with the fact that a reliable data security strategy is important. But some enterprises are still behind the times when it comes to knowing how best to secure their critical data in the current hack-centric environment. If it has been a while since you've taken the time to review how you're managing the access that you allow to your partners and remote users, move this task to the top of your to-do list. After all, when you read the news stories about how companies lost their data, many breaches get traced back to third parties who either intentionally or inadvertently compromised the data.

I'm just going to be blunt here — if you're still using a VPN (virtual private network) then your data isn't safe. Granted, VPNs used to be a secure solution — perhaps the most secure one — back in the days before the cloud. But physical servers are no longer king, and neither are VPNs or direct-link formats. Instead, in a new world where you're much more likely to see multi-cloud and hybrid deployments, or mixed environments of on-premise and cloud, companies need a security strategy that is designed specifically for these settings. This brings us back to SDP. This secure networking software allows IT to define which services that third-party vendors and other remote users can access in your network.

3. Does your remote access approach leave you with only a single router?

One of the disadvantages of VPNs is that they involve many complexities in configuration. They require a single router, which can boost the chance of data being compromised. A more effective way to handle third-party remote access is supporting a router environment that's heterogeneous, rather than relying only on one dedicated router.

There's another reason why you should avoid the single-router approach: you can avoid the common scenario of lock-in by a router vendor. An SDP solution allows for scaling across a multi-partner environment, moving your operations from cloud to cloud if needed.
 

4. What about application segmentation?

For optimum application performance as well as security, you need your remote-access approach to give network administrators the power for application-level segmentation (rather than network-level). To minimize the likelihood of a lateral attack on your network, you'll want to ensure that third-party partners can access your system only at the application level. By allowing more detailed control of access, vendors that you choose can only access specific services, not your entire system.

You may trust your partner's performance — but in a hybrid and multicloud environment, security concerns around partner data access can make application performance a moot point if you don't manage remote access correctly. A simple decision to modernize your approach to remote access can help ensure the data protection you need with third parties, so that application performance has a chance to shine.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...