Skip to main content

Checkmate VPN Intruders with Personal SASE Service

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats.

Traditional VPNs were built for a different era. Today, they struggle to keep up with modern infrastructure demands, are difficult to manage, and lack the adaptability to respond quickly to sophisticated attacks. A recent high-profile example is Ivanti's zero-day vulnerability, where attackers bypassed authentication and accessed systems without needing credentials. This flaw affected multiple products and left organizations scrambling to deploy patches while their networks remained exposed.

To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design — enter Personal SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), a model that transforms access control by combining security and network optimization.

Lags in Legacy

Ivanti's breach revealed several critical flaws in the legacy VPN model. Attackers exploited the zero-day to gain access to systems without credentials — a scenario made possible due to outdated security architectures.

Here are the key limitations that older VPN solutions suffer from:

1. Weak Encryption Standards – Many legacy VPNs use outdated protocols that are no longer considered secure.

2. Incompatibility with Cloud and Remote Workflows – As more applications move to the cloud and workers operate remotely, old VPNs struggle to maintain performance and reliability.

3. Slow Response to Threats – Vulnerabilities in traditional systems often remain unpatched for days or weeks, leaving a window for exploitation.

4. Open to attackers – These systems by nature publish their IP address so users can find them, but that also makes them vulnerable to attack.

These shortcomings are not just technical — they impact productivity, trust, and business continuity. Organizations relying on older VPN solutions face increased exposure with little recourse for rapid recovery.

A Modern Security Model: Personal SASE

Personal SASE services provide a more adaptive, secure, and performance-oriented framework than traditional VPNs. These solutions center around Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) — a model where access is never implicitly granted and is continuously verified based on user identity, context, and behavior.

Core architectural principles of a well-implemented SASE service include:

  • Deny-by-Default – All traffic is blocked unless explicitly permitted.
  • Dynamic Invisible Network Design – Makes your systems invisible to outsiders, reducing exposure.
  • Automated Moving Target Defense – Constantly rotates endpoint certificates and IPs to prevent attackers from locking on to a static target.

These design choices make it exceptionally difficult for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities, even newly discovered ones, because access is tightly restricted and systems are dynamically defended.

Transition Without Disruption

A key concern for organizations upgrading from legacy systems is how disruptive the transition might be. Fortunately, modern Personal SASE platforms are often designed to integrate seamlessly with existing tools like Active Directory, SAML, and other authentication services. That means organizations can adopt a modern security posture without completely overhauling their infrastructure. Personal SASE can be stood up in minutes and be fully operational in one or two days.

Support for Legacy Gateways During Migration

Organizations that still rely on IPsec gateways don't have to abandon them immediately. Some Personal SASE solutions offer adapters to support legacy VPN systems during the migration phase.

What are IPsec Gateways? These are hardware or software systems that secure IP communications using encryption and authentication. They're foundational in many legacy setups.

Adapters can enhance the security of these gateways by enabling:

1. Restricted Tunnel Creation – Prevents unknown external connections.

2. IP Whitelisting – Limits access to a few pre-approved IPs of IPsec proxies that have dynamic invisible network protection.

Once fully migrated, organizations can phase out these gateways entirely in favor of more modern, software-defined connectors that offer better security and even lower latency.

Beyond Security: Optimizing Performance

Security is only part of the equation. The best Personal SASE solutions also focus on performance. By distributing points of presence across the globe — often referred to as software-defined edges — these platforms reduce latency, improve load balancing, and deliver a smoother experience for end users.

This is especially critical for distributed teams, cloud-based apps, and collaboration platforms that require fast and reliable connections. Reduced latency doesn't just improve user experience — it directly impacts productivity.

Why It Matters

Switching to a Personal SASE model helps organizations address both immediate and future security concerns:

  • Protection Against Zero-Day Vulnerabilities – Proactive access control and dynamic defense limit exposure.
  • Simplified Security Management – Policies are easier to define and enforce across diverse users and locations.
  • Better Performance – Improved connectivity and reduced lag for remote users.
  • Future-Proofing – Designed to scale with evolving business and security needs.

Time to Switch

The limitations of old VPNs are clear: slow to update, poor performance, and vulnerable to sophisticated and unsophisticated attacks. As shown by the Ivanti breach, relying on outdated tech can lead to serious consequences.

Personal SASE solutions are built for the threats of today and tomorrow. Whether it's securing access, speeding up your network, or simplifying management, the right approach makes all the difference.

Cloudbrink, a provider in this space, delivers one such solution that combines ZTNA, high-performance network acceleration, and seamless legacy system integration. For organizations ready to evolve beyond patchwork VPNs, platforms like Cloudbrink offer a way forward — one that's secure, scalable, and performance-focused.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...

Checkmate VPN Intruders with Personal SASE Service

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats.

Traditional VPNs were built for a different era. Today, they struggle to keep up with modern infrastructure demands, are difficult to manage, and lack the adaptability to respond quickly to sophisticated attacks. A recent high-profile example is Ivanti's zero-day vulnerability, where attackers bypassed authentication and accessed systems without needing credentials. This flaw affected multiple products and left organizations scrambling to deploy patches while their networks remained exposed.

To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design — enter Personal SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), a model that transforms access control by combining security and network optimization.

Lags in Legacy

Ivanti's breach revealed several critical flaws in the legacy VPN model. Attackers exploited the zero-day to gain access to systems without credentials — a scenario made possible due to outdated security architectures.

Here are the key limitations that older VPN solutions suffer from:

1. Weak Encryption Standards – Many legacy VPNs use outdated protocols that are no longer considered secure.

2. Incompatibility with Cloud and Remote Workflows – As more applications move to the cloud and workers operate remotely, old VPNs struggle to maintain performance and reliability.

3. Slow Response to Threats – Vulnerabilities in traditional systems often remain unpatched for days or weeks, leaving a window for exploitation.

4. Open to attackers – These systems by nature publish their IP address so users can find them, but that also makes them vulnerable to attack.

These shortcomings are not just technical — they impact productivity, trust, and business continuity. Organizations relying on older VPN solutions face increased exposure with little recourse for rapid recovery.

A Modern Security Model: Personal SASE

Personal SASE services provide a more adaptive, secure, and performance-oriented framework than traditional VPNs. These solutions center around Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) — a model where access is never implicitly granted and is continuously verified based on user identity, context, and behavior.

Core architectural principles of a well-implemented SASE service include:

  • Deny-by-Default – All traffic is blocked unless explicitly permitted.
  • Dynamic Invisible Network Design – Makes your systems invisible to outsiders, reducing exposure.
  • Automated Moving Target Defense – Constantly rotates endpoint certificates and IPs to prevent attackers from locking on to a static target.

These design choices make it exceptionally difficult for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities, even newly discovered ones, because access is tightly restricted and systems are dynamically defended.

Transition Without Disruption

A key concern for organizations upgrading from legacy systems is how disruptive the transition might be. Fortunately, modern Personal SASE platforms are often designed to integrate seamlessly with existing tools like Active Directory, SAML, and other authentication services. That means organizations can adopt a modern security posture without completely overhauling their infrastructure. Personal SASE can be stood up in minutes and be fully operational in one or two days.

Support for Legacy Gateways During Migration

Organizations that still rely on IPsec gateways don't have to abandon them immediately. Some Personal SASE solutions offer adapters to support legacy VPN systems during the migration phase.

What are IPsec Gateways? These are hardware or software systems that secure IP communications using encryption and authentication. They're foundational in many legacy setups.

Adapters can enhance the security of these gateways by enabling:

1. Restricted Tunnel Creation – Prevents unknown external connections.

2. IP Whitelisting – Limits access to a few pre-approved IPs of IPsec proxies that have dynamic invisible network protection.

Once fully migrated, organizations can phase out these gateways entirely in favor of more modern, software-defined connectors that offer better security and even lower latency.

Beyond Security: Optimizing Performance

Security is only part of the equation. The best Personal SASE solutions also focus on performance. By distributing points of presence across the globe — often referred to as software-defined edges — these platforms reduce latency, improve load balancing, and deliver a smoother experience for end users.

This is especially critical for distributed teams, cloud-based apps, and collaboration platforms that require fast and reliable connections. Reduced latency doesn't just improve user experience — it directly impacts productivity.

Why It Matters

Switching to a Personal SASE model helps organizations address both immediate and future security concerns:

  • Protection Against Zero-Day Vulnerabilities – Proactive access control and dynamic defense limit exposure.
  • Simplified Security Management – Policies are easier to define and enforce across diverse users and locations.
  • Better Performance – Improved connectivity and reduced lag for remote users.
  • Future-Proofing – Designed to scale with evolving business and security needs.

Time to Switch

The limitations of old VPNs are clear: slow to update, poor performance, and vulnerable to sophisticated and unsophisticated attacks. As shown by the Ivanti breach, relying on outdated tech can lead to serious consequences.

Personal SASE solutions are built for the threats of today and tomorrow. Whether it's securing access, speeding up your network, or simplifying management, the right approach makes all the difference.

Cloudbrink, a provider in this space, delivers one such solution that combines ZTNA, high-performance network acceleration, and seamless legacy system integration. For organizations ready to evolve beyond patchwork VPNs, platforms like Cloudbrink offer a way forward — one that's secure, scalable, and performance-focused.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...