Skip to main content

Checkmate VPN Intruders with Personal SASE Service

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats.

Traditional VPNs were built for a different era. Today, they struggle to keep up with modern infrastructure demands, are difficult to manage, and lack the adaptability to respond quickly to sophisticated attacks. A recent high-profile example is Ivanti's zero-day vulnerability, where attackers bypassed authentication and accessed systems without needing credentials. This flaw affected multiple products and left organizations scrambling to deploy patches while their networks remained exposed.

To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design — enter Personal SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), a model that transforms access control by combining security and network optimization.

Lags in Legacy

Ivanti's breach revealed several critical flaws in the legacy VPN model. Attackers exploited the zero-day to gain access to systems without credentials — a scenario made possible due to outdated security architectures.

Here are the key limitations that older VPN solutions suffer from:

1. Weak Encryption Standards – Many legacy VPNs use outdated protocols that are no longer considered secure.

2. Incompatibility with Cloud and Remote Workflows – As more applications move to the cloud and workers operate remotely, old VPNs struggle to maintain performance and reliability.

3. Slow Response to Threats – Vulnerabilities in traditional systems often remain unpatched for days or weeks, leaving a window for exploitation.

4. Open to attackers – These systems by nature publish their IP address so users can find them, but that also makes them vulnerable to attack.

These shortcomings are not just technical — they impact productivity, trust, and business continuity. Organizations relying on older VPN solutions face increased exposure with little recourse for rapid recovery.

A Modern Security Model: Personal SASE

Personal SASE services provide a more adaptive, secure, and performance-oriented framework than traditional VPNs. These solutions center around Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) — a model where access is never implicitly granted and is continuously verified based on user identity, context, and behavior.

Core architectural principles of a well-implemented SASE service include:

  • Deny-by-Default – All traffic is blocked unless explicitly permitted.
  • Dynamic Invisible Network Design – Makes your systems invisible to outsiders, reducing exposure.
  • Automated Moving Target Defense – Constantly rotates endpoint certificates and IPs to prevent attackers from locking on to a static target.

These design choices make it exceptionally difficult for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities, even newly discovered ones, because access is tightly restricted and systems are dynamically defended.

Transition Without Disruption

A key concern for organizations upgrading from legacy systems is how disruptive the transition might be. Fortunately, modern Personal SASE platforms are often designed to integrate seamlessly with existing tools like Active Directory, SAML, and other authentication services. That means organizations can adopt a modern security posture without completely overhauling their infrastructure. Personal SASE can be stood up in minutes and be fully operational in one or two days.

Support for Legacy Gateways During Migration

Organizations that still rely on IPsec gateways don't have to abandon them immediately. Some Personal SASE solutions offer adapters to support legacy VPN systems during the migration phase.

What are IPsec Gateways? These are hardware or software systems that secure IP communications using encryption and authentication. They're foundational in many legacy setups.

Adapters can enhance the security of these gateways by enabling:

1. Restricted Tunnel Creation – Prevents unknown external connections.

2. IP Whitelisting – Limits access to a few pre-approved IPs of IPsec proxies that have dynamic invisible network protection.

Once fully migrated, organizations can phase out these gateways entirely in favor of more modern, software-defined connectors that offer better security and even lower latency.

Beyond Security: Optimizing Performance

Security is only part of the equation. The best Personal SASE solutions also focus on performance. By distributing points of presence across the globe — often referred to as software-defined edges — these platforms reduce latency, improve load balancing, and deliver a smoother experience for end users.

This is especially critical for distributed teams, cloud-based apps, and collaboration platforms that require fast and reliable connections. Reduced latency doesn't just improve user experience — it directly impacts productivity.

Why It Matters

Switching to a Personal SASE model helps organizations address both immediate and future security concerns:

  • Protection Against Zero-Day Vulnerabilities – Proactive access control and dynamic defense limit exposure.
  • Simplified Security Management – Policies are easier to define and enforce across diverse users and locations.
  • Better Performance – Improved connectivity and reduced lag for remote users.
  • Future-Proofing – Designed to scale with evolving business and security needs.

Time to Switch

The limitations of old VPNs are clear: slow to update, poor performance, and vulnerable to sophisticated and unsophisticated attacks. As shown by the Ivanti breach, relying on outdated tech can lead to serious consequences.

Personal SASE solutions are built for the threats of today and tomorrow. Whether it's securing access, speeding up your network, or simplifying management, the right approach makes all the difference.

Cloudbrink, a provider in this space, delivers one such solution that combines ZTNA, high-performance network acceleration, and seamless legacy system integration. For organizations ready to evolve beyond patchwork VPNs, platforms like Cloudbrink offer a way forward — one that's secure, scalable, and performance-focused.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Checkmate VPN Intruders with Personal SASE Service

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats.

Traditional VPNs were built for a different era. Today, they struggle to keep up with modern infrastructure demands, are difficult to manage, and lack the adaptability to respond quickly to sophisticated attacks. A recent high-profile example is Ivanti's zero-day vulnerability, where attackers bypassed authentication and accessed systems without needing credentials. This flaw affected multiple products and left organizations scrambling to deploy patches while their networks remained exposed.

To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design — enter Personal SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), a model that transforms access control by combining security and network optimization.

Lags in Legacy

Ivanti's breach revealed several critical flaws in the legacy VPN model. Attackers exploited the zero-day to gain access to systems without credentials — a scenario made possible due to outdated security architectures.

Here are the key limitations that older VPN solutions suffer from:

1. Weak Encryption Standards – Many legacy VPNs use outdated protocols that are no longer considered secure.

2. Incompatibility with Cloud and Remote Workflows – As more applications move to the cloud and workers operate remotely, old VPNs struggle to maintain performance and reliability.

3. Slow Response to Threats – Vulnerabilities in traditional systems often remain unpatched for days or weeks, leaving a window for exploitation.

4. Open to attackers – These systems by nature publish their IP address so users can find them, but that also makes them vulnerable to attack.

These shortcomings are not just technical — they impact productivity, trust, and business continuity. Organizations relying on older VPN solutions face increased exposure with little recourse for rapid recovery.

A Modern Security Model: Personal SASE

Personal SASE services provide a more adaptive, secure, and performance-oriented framework than traditional VPNs. These solutions center around Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) — a model where access is never implicitly granted and is continuously verified based on user identity, context, and behavior.

Core architectural principles of a well-implemented SASE service include:

  • Deny-by-Default – All traffic is blocked unless explicitly permitted.
  • Dynamic Invisible Network Design – Makes your systems invisible to outsiders, reducing exposure.
  • Automated Moving Target Defense – Constantly rotates endpoint certificates and IPs to prevent attackers from locking on to a static target.

These design choices make it exceptionally difficult for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities, even newly discovered ones, because access is tightly restricted and systems are dynamically defended.

Transition Without Disruption

A key concern for organizations upgrading from legacy systems is how disruptive the transition might be. Fortunately, modern Personal SASE platforms are often designed to integrate seamlessly with existing tools like Active Directory, SAML, and other authentication services. That means organizations can adopt a modern security posture without completely overhauling their infrastructure. Personal SASE can be stood up in minutes and be fully operational in one or two days.

Support for Legacy Gateways During Migration

Organizations that still rely on IPsec gateways don't have to abandon them immediately. Some Personal SASE solutions offer adapters to support legacy VPN systems during the migration phase.

What are IPsec Gateways? These are hardware or software systems that secure IP communications using encryption and authentication. They're foundational in many legacy setups.

Adapters can enhance the security of these gateways by enabling:

1. Restricted Tunnel Creation – Prevents unknown external connections.

2. IP Whitelisting – Limits access to a few pre-approved IPs of IPsec proxies that have dynamic invisible network protection.

Once fully migrated, organizations can phase out these gateways entirely in favor of more modern, software-defined connectors that offer better security and even lower latency.

Beyond Security: Optimizing Performance

Security is only part of the equation. The best Personal SASE solutions also focus on performance. By distributing points of presence across the globe — often referred to as software-defined edges — these platforms reduce latency, improve load balancing, and deliver a smoother experience for end users.

This is especially critical for distributed teams, cloud-based apps, and collaboration platforms that require fast and reliable connections. Reduced latency doesn't just improve user experience — it directly impacts productivity.

Why It Matters

Switching to a Personal SASE model helps organizations address both immediate and future security concerns:

  • Protection Against Zero-Day Vulnerabilities – Proactive access control and dynamic defense limit exposure.
  • Simplified Security Management – Policies are easier to define and enforce across diverse users and locations.
  • Better Performance – Improved connectivity and reduced lag for remote users.
  • Future-Proofing – Designed to scale with evolving business and security needs.

Time to Switch

The limitations of old VPNs are clear: slow to update, poor performance, and vulnerable to sophisticated and unsophisticated attacks. As shown by the Ivanti breach, relying on outdated tech can lead to serious consequences.

Personal SASE solutions are built for the threats of today and tomorrow. Whether it's securing access, speeding up your network, or simplifying management, the right approach makes all the difference.

Cloudbrink, a provider in this space, delivers one such solution that combines ZTNA, high-performance network acceleration, and seamless legacy system integration. For organizations ready to evolve beyond patchwork VPNs, platforms like Cloudbrink offer a way forward — one that's secure, scalable, and performance-focused.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.