Skip to main content

Cleric Launches Self-Learning AI SRE

Cleric announced the launch of an AI site reliability engineer (SRE) agent that continuously learns from every incident and helps software engineers move more quickly to resolve issues.

When an incident occurs, Cleric’s system autonomously investigates and delivers findings directly in Slack with links to relevant evidence. For complex cases, engineers can guide its reasoning through conversation or examine detailed diagnostics through a web interface. It provides confidence scores and learns from feedback, improving its signal-to-noise ratio over time.

Customers don’t need to rebuild or adapt their environments to take advantage of Cleric. Cleric helps teams manage the complexity of modern infrastructure by learning directly from their systems and interactions. It integrates with existing observability, CI/CD, and incident tooling (including popular observability platforms like Datadog and Grafana) to analyze alerts, correlate data, and surface root causes faster over time.

“We designed Cleric to reason about systems the way experienced engineers do: by correlating context across logs, metrics, and configurations, not just reacting to individual alerts,” said Willem Pienaar, Cleric’s co-founder and CTO.

“Any system operating at scale needs to adapt continuously,” said Shahram Anver, co-founder and CEO of Cleric. “Production isn’t static. It's a living environment. Cleric learns from every incident, alert, and human decision to evolve how it supports operations.”

Reliability and software engineering teams are already using Cleric’s agent to spend less of their time putting out fires and more time shipping code. Early adopters report freeing 20–30% of engineering capacity previously lost to repetitive troubleshooting.

Cleric raised a total of $9.8 million in seed funding. This new financing was led by Vertex Ventures US, with follow-on participation from its initial seed investor, Zetta Venture Partners. Cleric has also been named a Gartner Cool Vendor in AI for SRE and Observability 2025. These milestones underscore growing validation that adaptive, learning systems are the next step in how modern teams run production.

The company will use its new funding to expand R&D in San Francisco, accelerate customer deployments, scale production support to meet growing demand, and expand partnerships with observability and infrastructure platforms. 

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Cleric Launches Self-Learning AI SRE

Cleric announced the launch of an AI site reliability engineer (SRE) agent that continuously learns from every incident and helps software engineers move more quickly to resolve issues.

When an incident occurs, Cleric’s system autonomously investigates and delivers findings directly in Slack with links to relevant evidence. For complex cases, engineers can guide its reasoning through conversation or examine detailed diagnostics through a web interface. It provides confidence scores and learns from feedback, improving its signal-to-noise ratio over time.

Customers don’t need to rebuild or adapt their environments to take advantage of Cleric. Cleric helps teams manage the complexity of modern infrastructure by learning directly from their systems and interactions. It integrates with existing observability, CI/CD, and incident tooling (including popular observability platforms like Datadog and Grafana) to analyze alerts, correlate data, and surface root causes faster over time.

“We designed Cleric to reason about systems the way experienced engineers do: by correlating context across logs, metrics, and configurations, not just reacting to individual alerts,” said Willem Pienaar, Cleric’s co-founder and CTO.

“Any system operating at scale needs to adapt continuously,” said Shahram Anver, co-founder and CEO of Cleric. “Production isn’t static. It's a living environment. Cleric learns from every incident, alert, and human decision to evolve how it supports operations.”

Reliability and software engineering teams are already using Cleric’s agent to spend less of their time putting out fires and more time shipping code. Early adopters report freeing 20–30% of engineering capacity previously lost to repetitive troubleshooting.

Cleric raised a total of $9.8 million in seed funding. This new financing was led by Vertex Ventures US, with follow-on participation from its initial seed investor, Zetta Venture Partners. Cleric has also been named a Gartner Cool Vendor in AI for SRE and Observability 2025. These milestones underscore growing validation that adaptive, learning systems are the next step in how modern teams run production.

The company will use its new funding to expand R&D in San Francisco, accelerate customer deployments, scale production support to meet growing demand, and expand partnerships with observability and infrastructure platforms. 

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.