As organizations look for ways to bring their costs down, increase efficiencies and drive agility, they are increasingly looking to Converged Infrastructure as the preferred consumption model for their IT infrastructure. By bundling various components – computing, storage and network – into pre-engineered and pre-integrated solutions, vendors such as HP and IBM and Cisco UCS partners VCE and NetApp are delivering ready to deploy infrastructure stacks. Acquiring companies, if they so desire, can quickly convert these stacks into private clouds to deliver rapid provisioning and elastic scalability to their environment.
Zenoss recently released the findings of their second annual The State of Converged Infrastructure conducted during Q2 of 2014. The survey findings, pulled from the responses of 183 IT professionals from North American and multi-national organizations, explored how technology leaders are using or planning on using Converged Infrastructure (CI) solutions. The survey also highlights CI’s progression and year-to-year changes.
The results were promising for CI overall. Adoption is growing rapidly, with just under half the respondents reporting their CI stack is already in place, and another 44 percent reporting they are in the process of evaluating it. To clarify, the rapid adoption of CIs is not entirely unexpected – according to IDC, the overall spending on converged infrastructure is expected to grow to $17.8 billion by 2016 from a base of $2 billion in 2011.
What is interesting, however — and bodes well for the future of CI — is the fact that it is delivering tangible value to users. In fact, 75 percent of the organizations using Converged Infrastructure reported improved customer satisfaction and another 78 percent reported improved productivity of their IT staff.
Furthermore, the adoption itself appears to be quite widespread. Unlike the classic technology adoption pattern where technology companies take the lead with adoption, CI is gaining ground in adoption rates within the finance industry, and atypical early-adopters in the education vertical, also appear to be very interested in this new consumption model.
Here are some key highlights from the Zenoss study:
Adoption of Converged Infrastructure Proceeding Briskly
Just under half the organizations surveyed report already using a converged infrastructure stack. Meanwhile, 44 percent are considering or planning its adoption. While some organizations do have converged infrastructure offerings from more than one vendor, Cisco UCS and its derivatives, VCE Vblock and NetApp FlexPod, dominate the marketplace. Offerings from other vendors were also considered; the most notable vendors include HP, Oracle, EMC VSPEX, IBM Pure System, and Dell. Interestingly, smaller companies show significant interest in converged infrastructure, with 20 percent already using converged infrastructure and another 67 percent considering it.
Finance Leading Adoption Right Now - Technology Comes in Second
The finance industry is adopting converged infrastructure most rapidly, even ahead of technology companies. The two leading reasons for the consideration and adoption of converged infrastructure are agility and efficiencies. These are the same two reasons cited in the 2013 study. Once again, most organizations are adopting converged infrastructure in support of a VMware project, but there are many other adoption drivers, including IaaS and unified communications.
Many Plan on Building Their Own Converged Infrastructure, But Not Many Do
As companies begin their converged infrastructure initiatives, many plan on building their converged infrastructure themselves. Just under 50 percent said that DIY is their preferred approach. However, based on organizations that already have a converted infrastructure in place, this is not always the case. Only a small number actually are deploying an internally crafted converged infrastructure.
Converged Infrastructure Brings Increased Productivity and Value to Majority
Despite the perceived complexity, early adopters of Converged Infrastructure report improved productivity within the datacenter, with over 78 percent pointing to a faster mean time to resolution (MTTR) versus the 2 percent who reported that MTTR times got worse. Also, three out of four companies currently using converged infrastructure report delivering better customer service, while less than 2 percent claimed customer service value declined after deploying converged infrastructure.
IT Teams Still Not Reducing Complexity with Monitoring Tools
IT teams are taking a big step forward by upgrading their IT infrastructure with state-of-the-art technology stacks, yet they are not doing the same with their monitoring tools. In fact, over 55 percent of respondents were using four or more tools to manage the availability and performance of their converged infrastructure, with 29 percent juggling more than seven tools. This is a huge miss on the part of IT organizations.
Study after study shows that having too many tools can slow down root-cause analysis, increase management overhead, and reduce overall IT Operations productivity. This is crucial. Having the proper tools in place for unified monitoring will ensure that converged infrastructure can deliver on its value.
The value driven by Converged Infrastructure appears to be offsetting concerns around vendor lock-in and companies are willingly adopting a single-vendor stack over a best-of-breed custom-built environment. Those that have already adopted converged infrastructure are benefiting from better customer service, improved MTTR, and increased agility and speed. As for the naysayers – their current systems are adequate for now, but when a technology upgrade/refresh cycle occurs, there is a good possibility that Converged Infrastructure will be part of their consideration set.
Scott Hollis is Director of Product Marketing for Zenoss.
The "APM" solutions we've come to love over the last 2 decades can't handle Serverless Functions or deliver the same performance and operational details that they deliver for other architectural constructs — including App Servers, Frameworks, Cloud, even Containers. And the reason is that they're methodologies for collecting performance data simply won't operate with the same characteristics as it would in persistent code ...
I asked myself this important question: Can APM tools Manage Serverless Workloads? And the answer is "No, not really." It is true that every monitoring solution in the world claims support for monitoring serverless platforms (at least one of them). What I mean by my answer is that the "APM" solutions we've come to love over the last 2 decades can't handle Serverless Functions or deliver the same performance and operational details that they deliver for other architectural constructs ...
In Episode 11, Andrew Tunall, GM, New Relic Serverless & Emerging Cloud Services, joins the AI+ITOPS Podcast to discuss the challenges and advantages of distributed tracing ...
IT teams critically require better visibility into the network driven by a number of factors, including tremendous disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic, relentless technological advances, remote working reaching an all-time high and the expanding security threatscape, according to State of the Network 2020, a study conducted by VIAVI Solutions ...
Mobile commerce offers several benefits for retailers. But all this potential can only be fully realized if retailers can manage the associated challenges that mobile commerce introduces. Anyone involved in the development, operation or troubleshooting of a mobile shopping app needs to be aware of the three following technical obstacles and plan accordingly ...