Digma announced the Preemptive Observability Analysis engine.
The new engine will serve as a powerful checks and balances system to reduce the coding issues that plague codebases as they scale up on usage and complexity, slowing down engineering teams and impeding growth.
Preemptive Observability is set to become a critical differentiator to help enterprise engineering teams do more with less: companies using it can capitalize on the efficiencies of AI code generators while also increasing confidence in human-developed code by ensuring bugs and issues are flagged and fixed in pre-production.
Digma’s Preemptive Observability Analysis engine is designed not just to tackle bugs introduced by AI code generation, but also the longstanding issues many companies have had with unreliable human-generated code that could cause performance issues and SLA degradations. This will be particularly transformative for organizations in high transactional environments such as fintech, e-commerce, and retail.
Digma’s Preemptive Observability Analysis engine gives engineering teams code-level insight into the root cause of these issues while adding AI-driven fix suggestions to identify and resolve performance issues, architectural flaws, and problematic runtime behaviors. Preemptive Observability can identify issues before they impact production environments and become a significant drain on productivity. It achieves this by analyzing observability tracing data, even when data volumes are low.
Leveraging pattern matching and anomaly detection techniques, Digma’s algorithm extrapolates expected application performance metrics, enabling it to detect deviations or potential problems that have not yet impacted the application. In analyzing the tracing data, Digma pinpoints the issue to the specific responsible code and commits.
"We’re seeing a lot of effort invested in assuring optimal system performance, but many issues are still being discovered in complex code bases late in production," said Nir Shafrir, CEO and Co-founder of Digma. “It means that engineering teams may spend between 20-40% of their time addressing issues discovered late in production environments, with some organizations spending up to 50% of engineering resources on fixing production problems. Beyond this, scaling has often remained a rough estimation in organizations anticipating growth, and many are hitting barriers in technology growth that arise precisely during periods of significant organizational expansion.”
Digma’s Preemptive Observability Analysis engine’s new capabilities include:
- Pattern-based issue identification before code reaches production
- AI-driven fix suggestions based on runtime behavior analysis
- Team collaboration insights to prevent code conflicts between teams
- Cloud cost optimization through early detection of scaling issues
- Comprehensive management dashboards for non-coding engineering leaders
- Sandbox environment for evaluation without deployment
"While there are many code suggestion bots that scan code syntax, we're uniquely analyzing code as it executes in a pre-production environment,” explained Roni Dover, CTO and Co-founder of Digma. “By understanding runtime behavior and suggesting fixes for performance issues, scaling problems, and team conflicts, we're helping enterprises prevent problems and reduce risks proactively rather than putting out fires in production."
This launch follows Digma's recent $6 million seed funding round, highlighting growing investor confidence in the company's innovative approach to software quality. The funding supports continued product development focused on enterprise needs, particularly addressing the challenges faced by engineering managers, team leads, architects, and directors responsible for delivery timelines and code quality.
The Latest
In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.