Skip to main content

Entering a Golden Age of Data Monitoring

Thomas Stocking

The importance of artificial intelligence and machine learning for customer insight, product support, operational efficiency, and capacity planning are well-established, however, the benefits of monitoring data in those use cases is still evolving. Three main factors obscuring the benefits of data monitoring are the infinite volume of data, its diversity, and inconsistency. However, it's these same factors that are fueling a Golden Age of systems monitoring.

1. Data Availability is Increasing

The trend over the last several years has been to collect more data – more than can ever be analyzed by humans. Data monitoring tools, by their very function, are in and of themselves a significant source of data. With the advent of NoSQL databases, optimize-on-read technologies, and the availability of very fast data consumers (influxdb, Opentsdb, Cloudera, etc.), the amount of data from monitoring systems is exploding.

2. Monitoring Data is Diverse

You would think more is better, as is often the case with data. That is what we learned in high school stats class, after all. However, more isn't always better, and in fact, most of the data we gather from monitoring is rather difficult to analyze programmatically. There are many reasons for this such as the complexity of modern IT infrastructures as well as the diversity of data.

Data diversity is an old IT problem. We collect data on network traffic, for example, using SNMP counters in router and switch MIBs. We also use netflow/sflow and do direct packet capture and decoding. So to even answer the question, "Why is the network slow?" we have at least three potential data sources, each with its own collection method, data types, indices, units and formats. It's not impossible to do analysis on the data we collect, but it is hard to gain insight when dealing with what my colleagues and I call "plumbing problems."

3. Monitoring Data is Inconsistent

You would think after all this time monitoring systems there would be a standard for the storage and indexing of metrics for analysis. Well, there is. In fact, there are several (Metrics 2.0, etc.). Yet, we are still dealing with inconsistency across tools in such basic areas as units, time scales, and even appropriate collection methods. With these inconsistencies, sampling data at five minutes vs. five seconds can yield vastly divergent results.

Benefits from Monitoring Data

Despite these issues, we are moving into a Golden Age of analysis. It's clear the most consistent parts of the monitoring data stream such as availability (as determined by health checks, for example) can be mined for very useful data, and used to create easily understood reports. If you combine this with endpoint testing, such as synthetic transactions from an end-user perspective, the picture of availability becomes much clearer and can be used to effectively manage SLAs.

Delving a level or two deeper, measurements of resource consumption over time can reveal trends that help with capacity planning and cost prediction. Time series analysis of sets of data that are consistent can reveal bottlenecks and even begin to point the way to root cause analysis, though we are still far away from automating this aspect.

The Future of Data Monitoring

There's a revolution in monitoring data with the advent of the cloud. We are suddenly able to gather a lot of data on the availability and performance of nearly every aspect of our systems that we run in the cloud.

In fact, as far as APIs go, there are even services that will consume all of your application traffic and analyze it for you, opening the possibility of dynamic tracing of transactions through your systems. If you are going cloud-native, you can take advantage of this area of unprecedented completeness and consistency of data, with minimal "plumbing" to worry about.

However, expect your job to get both easier and harder. Easier, since you will have more data, and sophisticated systems to analyze it. These systems and data it produces are becoming more homogeneous with cloud technologies and more consistent as the monitoring industry settles on standards. This will provide you better data for the systems you buy to analyze.

It will also be harder. When your systems fail, you won't easily find the data needed to fix things yourself. Similar to your cloud vendor, your monitoring system will be a complex and powerful toolset that will need time to learn, and you will absolutely be reliant on your providers for their expertise in its finer points.

Despite these challenges, the potential impact of effective data monitoring is significant. Effective data monitoring can help reduce outage and availability issues, support capacity planning, optimize capital investment, and help maintain productivity and profitability across an entire IT infrastructure. As IT systems become increasingly more complex, data monitoring becomes increasingly more vital.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Entering a Golden Age of Data Monitoring

Thomas Stocking

The importance of artificial intelligence and machine learning for customer insight, product support, operational efficiency, and capacity planning are well-established, however, the benefits of monitoring data in those use cases is still evolving. Three main factors obscuring the benefits of data monitoring are the infinite volume of data, its diversity, and inconsistency. However, it's these same factors that are fueling a Golden Age of systems monitoring.

1. Data Availability is Increasing

The trend over the last several years has been to collect more data – more than can ever be analyzed by humans. Data monitoring tools, by their very function, are in and of themselves a significant source of data. With the advent of NoSQL databases, optimize-on-read technologies, and the availability of very fast data consumers (influxdb, Opentsdb, Cloudera, etc.), the amount of data from monitoring systems is exploding.

2. Monitoring Data is Diverse

You would think more is better, as is often the case with data. That is what we learned in high school stats class, after all. However, more isn't always better, and in fact, most of the data we gather from monitoring is rather difficult to analyze programmatically. There are many reasons for this such as the complexity of modern IT infrastructures as well as the diversity of data.

Data diversity is an old IT problem. We collect data on network traffic, for example, using SNMP counters in router and switch MIBs. We also use netflow/sflow and do direct packet capture and decoding. So to even answer the question, "Why is the network slow?" we have at least three potential data sources, each with its own collection method, data types, indices, units and formats. It's not impossible to do analysis on the data we collect, but it is hard to gain insight when dealing with what my colleagues and I call "plumbing problems."

3. Monitoring Data is Inconsistent

You would think after all this time monitoring systems there would be a standard for the storage and indexing of metrics for analysis. Well, there is. In fact, there are several (Metrics 2.0, etc.). Yet, we are still dealing with inconsistency across tools in such basic areas as units, time scales, and even appropriate collection methods. With these inconsistencies, sampling data at five minutes vs. five seconds can yield vastly divergent results.

Benefits from Monitoring Data

Despite these issues, we are moving into a Golden Age of analysis. It's clear the most consistent parts of the monitoring data stream such as availability (as determined by health checks, for example) can be mined for very useful data, and used to create easily understood reports. If you combine this with endpoint testing, such as synthetic transactions from an end-user perspective, the picture of availability becomes much clearer and can be used to effectively manage SLAs.

Delving a level or two deeper, measurements of resource consumption over time can reveal trends that help with capacity planning and cost prediction. Time series analysis of sets of data that are consistent can reveal bottlenecks and even begin to point the way to root cause analysis, though we are still far away from automating this aspect.

The Future of Data Monitoring

There's a revolution in monitoring data with the advent of the cloud. We are suddenly able to gather a lot of data on the availability and performance of nearly every aspect of our systems that we run in the cloud.

In fact, as far as APIs go, there are even services that will consume all of your application traffic and analyze it for you, opening the possibility of dynamic tracing of transactions through your systems. If you are going cloud-native, you can take advantage of this area of unprecedented completeness and consistency of data, with minimal "plumbing" to worry about.

However, expect your job to get both easier and harder. Easier, since you will have more data, and sophisticated systems to analyze it. These systems and data it produces are becoming more homogeneous with cloud technologies and more consistent as the monitoring industry settles on standards. This will provide you better data for the systems you buy to analyze.

It will also be harder. When your systems fail, you won't easily find the data needed to fix things yourself. Similar to your cloud vendor, your monitoring system will be a complex and powerful toolset that will need time to learn, and you will absolutely be reliant on your providers for their expertise in its finer points.

Despite these challenges, the potential impact of effective data monitoring is significant. Effective data monitoring can help reduce outage and availability issues, support capacity planning, optimize capital investment, and help maintain productivity and profitability across an entire IT infrastructure. As IT systems become increasingly more complex, data monitoring becomes increasingly more vital.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...