Enterprises Are Hitting Agentic AI Inflection Point

Learn more about Dynatrace

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace.

A Structural Shift: Reliability as the Gating Factor

The research found that approximately ~50% of projects are in Proof-of-Concept (POC) or pilot stage. Adoption is still early but growing rapidly with 26% of organizations having 11 or more projects. As organizations move beyond experimentation and into scaled deployment, they are increasingly seeking platforms that are reliable, trustworthy, and proven.

This shift is reflected in both ambition and execution, with 74% expecting budgets to rise again next year. These findings point to a structural inflection point where reliability, resilience, governance, and real-time insight define enterprise readiness for agentic AI.

Key findings from the report:

  • Almost half (48%) of the senior global leaders surveyed anticipate budget increases of at least $2M, suggesting investments are still prudent.
  • AI agents are most commonly deployed within IT operations and DevOps (72%), followed by software engineering (56%) and customer support (51%).Of those surveyed, business leaders say improving decision-making with real-time insights is top priority (51%) when deploying agentic AI, followed closely by improving system performance and reliability (50%) and improving internal efficiency to reduce operational costs (50%).
  • The greatest ROI expected for agentic AI projects is in ITOps/system monitoring (44%), cybersecurity (27%) and data processing & reporting (25%).
  • The top two main barriers to agentic AI production at this time are security, privacy or compliance concerns (52%) and technical challenges to managing and monitoring agents at scale (51%), followed by shortage of skilled staff or training (44%).

Trust and Human Oversight

Organizations signal that human guidance remains a purposeful part of agentic AI strategy, even as they build toward greater autonomy. The report shows leaders expect a 50/50 human–AI collaboration for IT and routine customer-support applications and a 60/40 human–AI collaboration for business applications, signaling that human judgment guides the system by setting goals, defining boundaries, and ensuring accountability.

Additional findings include:

  • While over half (64%) of organizations deploy a mix of autonomous and human-supervised agents, 69% of agentic AI–powered decisions are still verified by humans, and 87% of organizations are actively building or deploying agents that require human supervision.
  • Only 13% of organizations use fully autonomous agents, and just 23% rely exclusively on human-supervised agents.
  • The top validation methods include data quality checks (50%), human review of agent outputs (47%), and monitoring for drift or anomalies (41%).
  • 44% still use manual methods to review communication flows among AI agents, highlighting the need for more automated, governed oversight mechanisms.

"Organizations are not slowing adoption because they question the value of AI, but because scaling autonomous systems safely requires confidence that those systems will behave reliably and as intended in real-world conditions," said Alois Reitbauer, Chief Technology Strategist at Dynatrace. "With most enterprises now spending millions of dollars annually and planning further budget increases, agentic AI is becoming a core part of digital operations. At the same time, the data shows a clear shift underway. While human oversight remains essential today, organizations are increasingly preparing for more autonomous, AI-driven decision-making. The focus is now on building the trust and operational reliability needed to scale agentic AI responsibly."

Observability Enables Trust and Scale for Agentic AI

As organizations scale agentic AI beyond pilot projects, observability is the crucial intelligence layer that helps to build trust by providing visibility across every stage of the agentic AI lifecycle, from development and implementation through to operationalization. The report found that observability is already used across the entire lifecycle, with the highest adoption during implementation (69%), followed by operationalization (57%) and development (54%), underscoring its role as a foundational capability as agentic AI moves into production.

Additionally, the report found:

  • Nearly 70% of organizations surveyed already use observability during agentic AI implementation to gain real-time visibility into agent behavior, system performance, and decision-making in production environments.
  • 50% use agentic AI for both internal and external use cases, 33% for internal purposes only, and 18% for external purposes only.
  • 50% have agentic AI projects in production for limited use cases, 44% have projects in broad adoption across select departments, and 23% have projects in mature, enterprise-wide integration.

"Observability is a vital component of a successful agentic AI strategy," continued Reitbauer. "The Dynatrace AI Center of Excellence (AI CoE) works with many of our largest customers, and as organizations push toward greater autonomy, they need real-time visibility into how AI agents behave, interact, and make decisions. Observability not only helps teams understand performance and outcomes, but it provides the transparency and confidence required to scale agentic AI responsibly and with appropriate oversight."

Methodology: This report is based on a global survey of 919 senior leaders and decision makers directly involved in or responsible for agentic AI development and implementation in large enterprises with annual revenues of $100 million or more. It was conducted and analyzed by Qualtrics partner Y2 Analytics on behalf of Dynatrace during November and December 2025. The sample included 206 respondents in the US, 85 in Latin America, 380 in Europe, 81 in the Middle East, and 196 in Asia Pacific.

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Enterprises Are Hitting Agentic AI Inflection Point

Learn more about Dynatrace

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace.

A Structural Shift: Reliability as the Gating Factor

The research found that approximately ~50% of projects are in Proof-of-Concept (POC) or pilot stage. Adoption is still early but growing rapidly with 26% of organizations having 11 or more projects. As organizations move beyond experimentation and into scaled deployment, they are increasingly seeking platforms that are reliable, trustworthy, and proven.

This shift is reflected in both ambition and execution, with 74% expecting budgets to rise again next year. These findings point to a structural inflection point where reliability, resilience, governance, and real-time insight define enterprise readiness for agentic AI.

Key findings from the report:

  • Almost half (48%) of the senior global leaders surveyed anticipate budget increases of at least $2M, suggesting investments are still prudent.
  • AI agents are most commonly deployed within IT operations and DevOps (72%), followed by software engineering (56%) and customer support (51%).Of those surveyed, business leaders say improving decision-making with real-time insights is top priority (51%) when deploying agentic AI, followed closely by improving system performance and reliability (50%) and improving internal efficiency to reduce operational costs (50%).
  • The greatest ROI expected for agentic AI projects is in ITOps/system monitoring (44%), cybersecurity (27%) and data processing & reporting (25%).
  • The top two main barriers to agentic AI production at this time are security, privacy or compliance concerns (52%) and technical challenges to managing and monitoring agents at scale (51%), followed by shortage of skilled staff or training (44%).

Trust and Human Oversight

Organizations signal that human guidance remains a purposeful part of agentic AI strategy, even as they build toward greater autonomy. The report shows leaders expect a 50/50 human–AI collaboration for IT and routine customer-support applications and a 60/40 human–AI collaboration for business applications, signaling that human judgment guides the system by setting goals, defining boundaries, and ensuring accountability.

Additional findings include:

  • While over half (64%) of organizations deploy a mix of autonomous and human-supervised agents, 69% of agentic AI–powered decisions are still verified by humans, and 87% of organizations are actively building or deploying agents that require human supervision.
  • Only 13% of organizations use fully autonomous agents, and just 23% rely exclusively on human-supervised agents.
  • The top validation methods include data quality checks (50%), human review of agent outputs (47%), and monitoring for drift or anomalies (41%).
  • 44% still use manual methods to review communication flows among AI agents, highlighting the need for more automated, governed oversight mechanisms.

"Organizations are not slowing adoption because they question the value of AI, but because scaling autonomous systems safely requires confidence that those systems will behave reliably and as intended in real-world conditions," said Alois Reitbauer, Chief Technology Strategist at Dynatrace. "With most enterprises now spending millions of dollars annually and planning further budget increases, agentic AI is becoming a core part of digital operations. At the same time, the data shows a clear shift underway. While human oversight remains essential today, organizations are increasingly preparing for more autonomous, AI-driven decision-making. The focus is now on building the trust and operational reliability needed to scale agentic AI responsibly."

Observability Enables Trust and Scale for Agentic AI

As organizations scale agentic AI beyond pilot projects, observability is the crucial intelligence layer that helps to build trust by providing visibility across every stage of the agentic AI lifecycle, from development and implementation through to operationalization. The report found that observability is already used across the entire lifecycle, with the highest adoption during implementation (69%), followed by operationalization (57%) and development (54%), underscoring its role as a foundational capability as agentic AI moves into production.

Additionally, the report found:

  • Nearly 70% of organizations surveyed already use observability during agentic AI implementation to gain real-time visibility into agent behavior, system performance, and decision-making in production environments.
  • 50% use agentic AI for both internal and external use cases, 33% for internal purposes only, and 18% for external purposes only.
  • 50% have agentic AI projects in production for limited use cases, 44% have projects in broad adoption across select departments, and 23% have projects in mature, enterprise-wide integration.

"Observability is a vital component of a successful agentic AI strategy," continued Reitbauer. "The Dynatrace AI Center of Excellence (AI CoE) works with many of our largest customers, and as organizations push toward greater autonomy, they need real-time visibility into how AI agents behave, interact, and make decisions. Observability not only helps teams understand performance and outcomes, but it provides the transparency and confidence required to scale agentic AI responsibly and with appropriate oversight."

Methodology: This report is based on a global survey of 919 senior leaders and decision makers directly involved in or responsible for agentic AI development and implementation in large enterprises with annual revenues of $100 million or more. It was conducted and analyzed by Qualtrics partner Y2 Analytics on behalf of Dynatrace during November and December 2025. The sample included 206 respondents in the US, 85 in Latin America, 380 in Europe, 81 in the Middle East, and 196 in Asia Pacific.

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...