Skip to main content

Enterprises Have Opportunities to Expand Use of Emergent Data Sources for AI and More

As organizations strive to capitalize on their ever-growing data trove to scale their operations and improve business outcomes, only 17% of data ingested or landed consists of emergent data types, and only 9% of that data is processed or analyzed, according to a new report from BMC, Putting the "Ops" in DataOps: Success factors for operationalizing data. This signals a significant opportunity to benefit from emergent data types critical for initiatives like generative AI, LLMs, FinOps, and sustainability. The study defined four maturity levels, including: 

■ Developing – discovery phase with strategies in their infancy, and practices and architecture not closely aligned to business outcomes. 

■ Functional – growth phase with strategies primarily developed and some high-priority practices and architecture linked to business outcomes. 

■ Proficient – adolescent phase representing a fully established strategy with nearly all practices and architecture linked to critical business outcomes.

 ■ Exceptional – innovation phase with a perpetually optimized strategy, practices, and architecture that generates competitive differentiation and business value. 

DataOps strategy is closely aligned with data management maturity. Of those respondents with exceptional data management maturity, 27% stated they use DataOps methodologies across their organization to support all data-driven activities. In comparison, those with proficient maturity levels reported 19%, and functional and developing levels stated 15% and 10%, respectively. Even among organizations with exceptional data maturity, only 41% report having "high maturity" for data pipeline and application workflow orchestration functions. Higher data management and DataOps maturity are linked to higher reported adoption and success with data-driven activities. 75% of those with mature practices have a Chief Data Officer, while only 54% with less mature practices do.

Challenges Obstruct Flow of Data

Multiple challenges continue to impact the flow of data in businesses, including those related to people, processes, and technology. These include a lack of skills (48%), human error and mistakes (43%), limitations on scalability (40%), and a lack of technology automation (43%). A lack of automation can exacerbate a lack of skills, while an appropriate use of automation can amplify skills already available. 

"AI and data are in a cosmic dance, and data challenges are increasing dramatically in the AI era," said Ram Chakravarti, chief technology officer at BMC. "This study highlights how organizations with mature data practices can achieve better business outcomes. Implementing DataOps methodologies to enhance collaboration and operational efficiency, maintaining high data quality through pragmatic investments, and developing robust data pipeline orchestration systems can help unlock value at scale." 

Methodology: BMC commissioned 451 Research, part of S&P Global Market Intelligence, to conduct the survey in late 2023, sourcing insights from 1,100 IT, data, and business professionals from large enterprises in diverse global regions across multiple industries in eleven countries.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Enterprises Have Opportunities to Expand Use of Emergent Data Sources for AI and More

As organizations strive to capitalize on their ever-growing data trove to scale their operations and improve business outcomes, only 17% of data ingested or landed consists of emergent data types, and only 9% of that data is processed or analyzed, according to a new report from BMC, Putting the "Ops" in DataOps: Success factors for operationalizing data. This signals a significant opportunity to benefit from emergent data types critical for initiatives like generative AI, LLMs, FinOps, and sustainability. The study defined four maturity levels, including: 

■ Developing – discovery phase with strategies in their infancy, and practices and architecture not closely aligned to business outcomes. 

■ Functional – growth phase with strategies primarily developed and some high-priority practices and architecture linked to business outcomes. 

■ Proficient – adolescent phase representing a fully established strategy with nearly all practices and architecture linked to critical business outcomes.

 ■ Exceptional – innovation phase with a perpetually optimized strategy, practices, and architecture that generates competitive differentiation and business value. 

DataOps strategy is closely aligned with data management maturity. Of those respondents with exceptional data management maturity, 27% stated they use DataOps methodologies across their organization to support all data-driven activities. In comparison, those with proficient maturity levels reported 19%, and functional and developing levels stated 15% and 10%, respectively. Even among organizations with exceptional data maturity, only 41% report having "high maturity" for data pipeline and application workflow orchestration functions. Higher data management and DataOps maturity are linked to higher reported adoption and success with data-driven activities. 75% of those with mature practices have a Chief Data Officer, while only 54% with less mature practices do.

Challenges Obstruct Flow of Data

Multiple challenges continue to impact the flow of data in businesses, including those related to people, processes, and technology. These include a lack of skills (48%), human error and mistakes (43%), limitations on scalability (40%), and a lack of technology automation (43%). A lack of automation can exacerbate a lack of skills, while an appropriate use of automation can amplify skills already available. 

"AI and data are in a cosmic dance, and data challenges are increasing dramatically in the AI era," said Ram Chakravarti, chief technology officer at BMC. "This study highlights how organizations with mature data practices can achieve better business outcomes. Implementing DataOps methodologies to enhance collaboration and operational efficiency, maintaining high data quality through pragmatic investments, and developing robust data pipeline orchestration systems can help unlock value at scale." 

Methodology: BMC commissioned 451 Research, part of S&P Global Market Intelligence, to conduct the survey in late 2023, sourcing insights from 1,100 IT, data, and business professionals from large enterprises in diverse global regions across multiple industries in eleven countries.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...