On Wednesday, May 6th, iOS users all over the world experienced an app crash when they tried to open popular apps such as TikTok, GroupMe, Spotify, and Pinterest.
How did simultaneous crashes occur across so many independent apps? What's the common thread that would cause widespread app crashes?
Turns out, it was a change in behavior in the Facebook API. Some may wonder what Facebook has to do with logging into your favorite music source or social media app. And the answer is: Quite a lot, actually.
Most major consumer apps connect to Facebook to utilize functions such as seamless login, share functionality, and advertising insights. When the API change impacted Facebook's iOS SDK, consumer apps were the first in line to discover the issue, thanks to deep integrations with Facebook that occur at application launch.
What Facebook's outage demonstrates is how important it is to invest in an error monitoring solution that is built to handle widespread and concurrent crash reports without dropping them, as well as the importance of practicing defensive programming.
Why Your Selection of an Error Monitoring Solution Matters
When the Facebook issue occurred, every error monitoring provider saw an immediate and direct impact on the iOS apps they support. A huge volume of crash reports occurred simultaneously within minutes of the issue being reported on Github.
Naturally, this type of error spike dramatically increases the volume of crash reports ingested by error monitoring services. With a sudden deluge of crash reports, how should an error monitoring solution handle it?
The correct response is to buffer increases in crash reports without dropping any and to scale systems to handle the additional load. A robust error monitoring tool should be able to manage the spike and continue to process events, even if this means the worst-case scenario of a slight delay in processing time. Once the bug is rolled back or fixed (as was the case with Facebook within about three hours), any backlog of events should be addressed quickly.
This response demonstrates what you want from an error monitoring solution, which can be summed up in three points.
1. Acknowledge there's a problem: Error monitoring providers should be first in line to provide information about the source of a problem. Because they have more insight into a widespread issue than any single app provider will have, error monitoring organizations should provide information and updates to customers to keep them abreast of the larger situation and how the problem is being handled.
2. Provide error events and data: When an app starts to see a huge spike in user crashes, developers need to know why. The first thing they do is turn to their error monitoring solution to see where the error is originating. A solid error monitoring solution should be able to process a stream of error data within a reasonable amount of time and provide some clues about what's happening.
3. Deliver, not disable, continuous processing: Delays in processing errors are one thing; suspending processing of errors is another. Disabling error processing is completely unacceptable from any error monitoring provider. The main function of these tools is to provide continuous monitoring so that developers can view, dissect, and measure all errors — in real time or, at worst, in hindsight. Anything less means the tool isn't doing its job.
As the Facebook issue demonstrated for many unsuspecting organizations, challenges arise when you rely on free error monitoring tools. First and foremost, free services are more likely to take the "easy path" when things get tough. Rather than manage an onslaught of errors, these tools may simply shut down.
That's right: Free error monitoring tools are often turned off for the duration (or longer) of a widespread problem, based on a very simple cost/benefit analysis. Since organizations aren't paying directly for the service (collection of data is the "payment"), there's no accountability from these providers, no incentive to manage the situation correctly, and no real customer support.
After all, disabling the service is much easier than handling the crisis. The only loss for the free error monitoring provider? The opportunity to collect more data.
As a result, organizations that rely on free tools don't have the benefit of hindsight. They can't use their own error data to understand what happened, nor do they see any subsequent errors that should've been captured, starting at the time of the original occurrence and extending to the moment the service is turned back on.
This situation perfectly sums up that old adage, You get what you pay for. Sadly, it ain't a lot.
Practice Defensive Programming and Error Monitoring
The SDK issue isn't unique to Facebook. A few weeks ago, almost the exact same thing happened to Doordash, Uber Eats, and other apps that rely on maps when the Google Maps iOS SDK experienced an issue.
The two most important takeaways from these widespread app disasters:
1. Good SDK design tenets dictate that SDKs should never crash an application. What was missing in both the Facebook and Google Maps cases — and what every app company must have — are defensive programming measures that ensure better handling of malformed data from outside servers.
2. Error monitoring solutions matter a great deal. In order to understand how outages and errors occur, you must have error processing in real time in order to address a challenge and pinpoint bad code. If you select an error monitoring provider that simply disables its service when things get tough, then you'll remain in the dark. And, with free services, you can pretty much bet on that outcome.
What these outages also demonstrate is the absolute need for good software design and error monitoring processes. Developers must know exactly what app features are controlled remotely and why, where everything is documented, and how to turn off third-party apps when things go sideways without impacting the user experience.
In an interconnected app world, errors are going to happen. The real question is, can you trust your error monitoring system to always have your crash reports?
IT operations is a metrics-driven function and teams should keep score as a core practice. Services and sub-services break, alerts of varying quality come in, incidents are created, and services get fixed. Analytics can help IT teams improve these operations ...
Big Data makes it possible to bring data from all the monitoring and reporting tools together, both for more effective analysis and a simplified single-pane view for the user. IT teams gain a holistic picture of system performance. Doing this makes sense because the system's components interact, and issues in one area affect another ...
IT engineers and executives are responsible for system reliability and availability. The volume of data can make it hard to be proactive and fix issues quickly. With over a decade of experience in the field, I know the importance of IT operations analytics and how it can help identify incidents and enable agile responses ...
For businesses with vast and distributed computing infrastructures, one of the main objectives of IT and network operations is to locate the cause of a service condition that is having an impact. The more human resources are put into the task of gathering, processing, and finally visual monitoring the massive volumes of event and log data that serve as the main source of symptomatic indications for emerging crises, the closer the service is to the company's source of revenue ...
Our digital economy is intolerant of downtime. But consumers haven't just come to expect always-on digital apps and services. They also expect continuous innovation, new functionality and lightening fast response times. Organizations have taken note, investing heavily in teams and tools that supposedly increase uptime and free resources for innovation. But leaders have not realized this "throw money at the problem" approach to monitoring is burning through resources without much improvement in availability outcomes ...