Skip to main content

Got VoIP? Then Monitor These Key Network Metrics

How jitter, latency, and packet loss impact VoIP quality of service
Patrick Carey

Chances are you either have already or are contemplating replacing your old POTS/PBX telephone system with some flavor of Voice of IP (VoIP). With so many solutions available, you may even be thinking about going beyond a simple phone system replacement and upgrading to a rich unified communications suite, complete with real-time voice, video, screen sharing, and collaborative document editing.

The good news is that you don’t even need to have a seven-figure IT budget to get all these features. Pay-as-you-go SaaS offerings like Skype for Business, GoToMeeting, join.me, BlueJeans, WebEx and others have put unified communications in reach of every organization. But before you cut the phone cord you need to understand how your network performance (or lack thereof) can make or break your user experience and productivity with these tools.

Quality of Service Metrics for Unified Communications

We’ve all suffered through live meetings or VoIP calls where the audio and/or video was bad. A few extra seconds in a webpage load might go unnoticed but when audio and video is choppy, delayed, or has gaps, it can be excruciating.

To ensure Quality of Service (QoS) for VoIP and unified communications you need monitor and manage three basic network metrics:

Latency – how much time it takes for data packets to get from one designated point to another.

Jitter – the variation in in latency over time.

Packet Loss – the percentage of packets that never reach their intended destination.

Let’s take a quick look at the effects, root causes, and remediation techniques for each metric.

Latency

Ever been on a conference call with somebody in an adjacent office or cubicle? You end up hearing everything they say twice, first directly from them and (hopefully) through your headset or speakers a short time later. That’s latency. There’s always some, but when the round trip latency goes above about 250ms we start to notice it – awkward pauses and people talking over each other. Some latency is out of your control (e.g. for calls that traverse the internet), but you should aim for internal network latency levels of less than 150ms.

Latency problems are usually the result in packet handling and queuing delays; essentially packets get bogged down at your network nodes, either because the network is not configured to expedite delivery of VoIP/UC traffic or there is insufficient bandwidth.

Jitter

Most VoIP/UC solutions employ packet buffers to compensate for some amount of jitter, so it’s often not as easy to detect problems on calls. High jitter rates (i.e. large fluctuations in latency) will often result in dropped packets and gaps and audio/video transmission. In general, you want to have internal network jitter of less than 100ms. Jitter beyond that level will result in additional transmission delay (from the buffer processing) and potentially packet loss. Jitter is also often a sign of networks not configured to prioritize VoIP/UC packets.

Packet Loss

VoIP is highly susceptible to packet loss. Even a 1% packet loss will noticeably affect most real time protocol (RTP) codecs. VoIP/UC clients will recover the best they can but the user experience will be very poor, resulting in lost productivity, aborted calls, and sometimes headsets that are smashed to bits in a fit of rage.

Packet loss is often the a symptom of latency/jitter issues, but is often the result of network misconfigurations, insufficient bandwidth, or simply network equipment that is not up to the task of handling the increased demands of real time communication and collaboration.

Getting Ready for VoIP

To get ahead of these problems, you need to implement a monitoring and remediation plan early, ideally before you deploy these IP communications solution widely. This plan should include the following:

Baseline Testing and Ongoing Monitoring – You can’t fix what you don’t see. It’s a good idea to run some diagnostics/synthetic point-to-point tests within your network to measure baseline latency, jitter, and packet loss metrics so you can see how well your network is configured today. However, it’s also important that you continue to monitor these metrics as you scale your VoIP/UC deployment so you don’t get blindsided as users come online.

Network Configuration Improvements – Your existing network equipment may support higher VoIP QOS but require configuration changes to do so. Configuring to prioritize VoIP traffic will improve both latency and jitter. Bandwidth reservation, policy-based network management, Type of Service, Class of Service, and Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) are techniques generally used for prioritizing VoIP traffic.

Network Equipment Upgrades – It may be time to replace older and less capable network equipment. High quality VoIP routers will have a significant impact on these issues and are a must if you are using VoIP as a complete replacement to your legacy phone system. In addition you should consider upgrading your internet connection. You’ll be needing more speed and bandwidth going forward.

With a solid monitor, reconfigure, and upgrade plan in place your users will have fewer call problems and you’ll have few mangled headsets to replace.

Patrick Carey is VP Product Management & Marketing at Exoprise.

The Latest

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

Got VoIP? Then Monitor These Key Network Metrics

How jitter, latency, and packet loss impact VoIP quality of service
Patrick Carey

Chances are you either have already or are contemplating replacing your old POTS/PBX telephone system with some flavor of Voice of IP (VoIP). With so many solutions available, you may even be thinking about going beyond a simple phone system replacement and upgrading to a rich unified communications suite, complete with real-time voice, video, screen sharing, and collaborative document editing.

The good news is that you don’t even need to have a seven-figure IT budget to get all these features. Pay-as-you-go SaaS offerings like Skype for Business, GoToMeeting, join.me, BlueJeans, WebEx and others have put unified communications in reach of every organization. But before you cut the phone cord you need to understand how your network performance (or lack thereof) can make or break your user experience and productivity with these tools.

Quality of Service Metrics for Unified Communications

We’ve all suffered through live meetings or VoIP calls where the audio and/or video was bad. A few extra seconds in a webpage load might go unnoticed but when audio and video is choppy, delayed, or has gaps, it can be excruciating.

To ensure Quality of Service (QoS) for VoIP and unified communications you need monitor and manage three basic network metrics:

Latency – how much time it takes for data packets to get from one designated point to another.

Jitter – the variation in in latency over time.

Packet Loss – the percentage of packets that never reach their intended destination.

Let’s take a quick look at the effects, root causes, and remediation techniques for each metric.

Latency

Ever been on a conference call with somebody in an adjacent office or cubicle? You end up hearing everything they say twice, first directly from them and (hopefully) through your headset or speakers a short time later. That’s latency. There’s always some, but when the round trip latency goes above about 250ms we start to notice it – awkward pauses and people talking over each other. Some latency is out of your control (e.g. for calls that traverse the internet), but you should aim for internal network latency levels of less than 150ms.

Latency problems are usually the result in packet handling and queuing delays; essentially packets get bogged down at your network nodes, either because the network is not configured to expedite delivery of VoIP/UC traffic or there is insufficient bandwidth.

Jitter

Most VoIP/UC solutions employ packet buffers to compensate for some amount of jitter, so it’s often not as easy to detect problems on calls. High jitter rates (i.e. large fluctuations in latency) will often result in dropped packets and gaps and audio/video transmission. In general, you want to have internal network jitter of less than 100ms. Jitter beyond that level will result in additional transmission delay (from the buffer processing) and potentially packet loss. Jitter is also often a sign of networks not configured to prioritize VoIP/UC packets.

Packet Loss

VoIP is highly susceptible to packet loss. Even a 1% packet loss will noticeably affect most real time protocol (RTP) codecs. VoIP/UC clients will recover the best they can but the user experience will be very poor, resulting in lost productivity, aborted calls, and sometimes headsets that are smashed to bits in a fit of rage.

Packet loss is often the a symptom of latency/jitter issues, but is often the result of network misconfigurations, insufficient bandwidth, or simply network equipment that is not up to the task of handling the increased demands of real time communication and collaboration.

Getting Ready for VoIP

To get ahead of these problems, you need to implement a monitoring and remediation plan early, ideally before you deploy these IP communications solution widely. This plan should include the following:

Baseline Testing and Ongoing Monitoring – You can’t fix what you don’t see. It’s a good idea to run some diagnostics/synthetic point-to-point tests within your network to measure baseline latency, jitter, and packet loss metrics so you can see how well your network is configured today. However, it’s also important that you continue to monitor these metrics as you scale your VoIP/UC deployment so you don’t get blindsided as users come online.

Network Configuration Improvements – Your existing network equipment may support higher VoIP QOS but require configuration changes to do so. Configuring to prioritize VoIP traffic will improve both latency and jitter. Bandwidth reservation, policy-based network management, Type of Service, Class of Service, and Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) are techniques generally used for prioritizing VoIP traffic.

Network Equipment Upgrades – It may be time to replace older and less capable network equipment. High quality VoIP routers will have a significant impact on these issues and are a must if you are using VoIP as a complete replacement to your legacy phone system. In addition you should consider upgrading your internet connection. You’ll be needing more speed and bandwidth going forward.

With a solid monitor, reconfigure, and upgrade plan in place your users will have fewer call problems and you’ll have few mangled headsets to replace.

Patrick Carey is VP Product Management & Marketing at Exoprise.

The Latest

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...