Skip to main content

Is Your Data Safe? How to Assess Your Data Risk - Part 2

Christophe Toum
Talend

What's Involved in Risk Assessment?

When it comes to your data, there is no single magic bullet that can protect you from every scenario. But you can improve your overall data health by taking a closer look at the three aspects of data risk: sources, security and compliance.

Start with: Is Your Data Safe? How to Assess Your Data Risk - Part 1

Data Sources

Understanding both the quality of individual sources and the quality of your data mapping is key to assessing your risk. When we talk about data sources, we have to consider not only where data comes from, but how it enters our systems. For example, it's probably safe to assume that the lead list you purchased from a vendor isn't as accurate or up-to-date as the list of leads you captured from a recent, targeted, double-opt-in campaign.

But even if you could 100% trust the accuracy of every record from every source — including manual entry by salespeople, submissions from any range of online forms, engagements within products or mobile apps and shared data from partners or parent companies — you would still be looking at a multiplicity of fields, standards and definitions across sources. One source may require a country code in the phone number field, while another does not. One source may have a single name field, while all the others break out first and last names.

Getting these sources to all speak the same language can be a challenge in and of itself, but it is well worth the time and consideration. Fortunately, there are technologies available that will automate data quality as part of the data integration process, so you can avoid risk with the steep time investment of manual data correction. Also, the industry is beginning to recognize the importance of swiftly identifying data's integrity — 95% of executives agree there should be cross industry standard metrics to assess the quality of enterprise data.

Data Security

If all your data were collected in a single Excel spreadsheet, it would be pretty easy to assign a person or two to watch over that data, to keep it secure and to validate it, line by line. But that's not the world we live in. In fact, less than half of enterprise executives report delivering data accuracy, consistency, accessibility or completeness as "very good."

This data disorder is created by a landscape of data infrastructures composed of a complex network of interconnected programs and platforms. There are obviously tools that specialize in connecting systems and ingesting data into a repository. And some businesses have success just doing that — but are they really getting a true sense of data health? Would they even know if they had data quality issues?

The first step of data security is securely connecting to our data sources, ingesting the data and performing that first pass of data quality checks to ensure that we're getting the right data in the right fields. Next, data profiling technology can help us make sure that phone numbers look like phone numbers, and emails look like emails, and so on, so we can feel safe that we haven't mis-categorized sensitive information. Some profiling technologies may even be able to automate resolution for common data errors.

After that, it's time for people to get involved, so the data experts can manually correct, reconcile and validate any records that cannot be confidently evaluated by the automated data quality tools. Proper processes and workflows need to be in place so that the right people can look at it in a formal way. This will require technology for data inventory, data stewardship and data preparation.

Compliance

Good intentions — even good intentions backed by good technology — can only take you so far. A recent study by the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) discovered that up to 90% of data breaches can be traced back to human error. Believe it or not, this is good news — back in 2015, IBM reported that a full 95% of data breaches were caused by human error.

Technology can help here by providing a centralized infrastructure for managing and ensuring compliance across the organization. These products allow you to establish clear access protocols and permissions that will protect your data, without creating false barriers to access that might make people less effective at their jobs. They also make it possible to automate the classification of data through semantic types and build a well-defined business glossary, so that everyone is speaking the same business language when it comes to their data.

Protecting Yourself from Risk

Your data is too important to leave anything to chance. It will take a balance of people and processes, supported by the right technology and automation, for you to keep up with the never-ending flow of data through your company. In a perfect world, we would all have top-of-the-line security solutions and 100% compliance with every piece of advice from the IT team. But, even in this imperfect world, we can make significant progress.

If you're getting ready to make a change, start small: make sure that your data is standardized, cleansed and adheres to whatever standards you have. Solving the problem of compromised data sources will have a ripple effect throughout the organization, making everyone more effective and efficient, and freeing up resources to devote to larger data issues.

Christophe Toum is Senior Director of Product Management at Talend

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Is Your Data Safe? How to Assess Your Data Risk - Part 2

Christophe Toum
Talend

What's Involved in Risk Assessment?

When it comes to your data, there is no single magic bullet that can protect you from every scenario. But you can improve your overall data health by taking a closer look at the three aspects of data risk: sources, security and compliance.

Start with: Is Your Data Safe? How to Assess Your Data Risk - Part 1

Data Sources

Understanding both the quality of individual sources and the quality of your data mapping is key to assessing your risk. When we talk about data sources, we have to consider not only where data comes from, but how it enters our systems. For example, it's probably safe to assume that the lead list you purchased from a vendor isn't as accurate or up-to-date as the list of leads you captured from a recent, targeted, double-opt-in campaign.

But even if you could 100% trust the accuracy of every record from every source — including manual entry by salespeople, submissions from any range of online forms, engagements within products or mobile apps and shared data from partners or parent companies — you would still be looking at a multiplicity of fields, standards and definitions across sources. One source may require a country code in the phone number field, while another does not. One source may have a single name field, while all the others break out first and last names.

Getting these sources to all speak the same language can be a challenge in and of itself, but it is well worth the time and consideration. Fortunately, there are technologies available that will automate data quality as part of the data integration process, so you can avoid risk with the steep time investment of manual data correction. Also, the industry is beginning to recognize the importance of swiftly identifying data's integrity — 95% of executives agree there should be cross industry standard metrics to assess the quality of enterprise data.

Data Security

If all your data were collected in a single Excel spreadsheet, it would be pretty easy to assign a person or two to watch over that data, to keep it secure and to validate it, line by line. But that's not the world we live in. In fact, less than half of enterprise executives report delivering data accuracy, consistency, accessibility or completeness as "very good."

This data disorder is created by a landscape of data infrastructures composed of a complex network of interconnected programs and platforms. There are obviously tools that specialize in connecting systems and ingesting data into a repository. And some businesses have success just doing that — but are they really getting a true sense of data health? Would they even know if they had data quality issues?

The first step of data security is securely connecting to our data sources, ingesting the data and performing that first pass of data quality checks to ensure that we're getting the right data in the right fields. Next, data profiling technology can help us make sure that phone numbers look like phone numbers, and emails look like emails, and so on, so we can feel safe that we haven't mis-categorized sensitive information. Some profiling technologies may even be able to automate resolution for common data errors.

After that, it's time for people to get involved, so the data experts can manually correct, reconcile and validate any records that cannot be confidently evaluated by the automated data quality tools. Proper processes and workflows need to be in place so that the right people can look at it in a formal way. This will require technology for data inventory, data stewardship and data preparation.

Compliance

Good intentions — even good intentions backed by good technology — can only take you so far. A recent study by the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) discovered that up to 90% of data breaches can be traced back to human error. Believe it or not, this is good news — back in 2015, IBM reported that a full 95% of data breaches were caused by human error.

Technology can help here by providing a centralized infrastructure for managing and ensuring compliance across the organization. These products allow you to establish clear access protocols and permissions that will protect your data, without creating false barriers to access that might make people less effective at their jobs. They also make it possible to automate the classification of data through semantic types and build a well-defined business glossary, so that everyone is speaking the same business language when it comes to their data.

Protecting Yourself from Risk

Your data is too important to leave anything to chance. It will take a balance of people and processes, supported by the right technology and automation, for you to keep up with the never-ending flow of data through your company. In a perfect world, we would all have top-of-the-line security solutions and 100% compliance with every piece of advice from the IT team. But, even in this imperfect world, we can make significant progress.

If you're getting ready to make a change, start small: make sure that your data is standardized, cleansed and adheres to whatever standards you have. Solving the problem of compromised data sources will have a ripple effect throughout the organization, making everyone more effective and efficient, and freeing up resources to devote to larger data issues.

Christophe Toum is Senior Director of Product Management at Talend

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...